Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Impact of genetic variations in the WNT family members and RUNX2 on dental and skeletal maturation: a cross-sectional study

Head & Face Medicine volume 19, Article number: 26 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

This study evaluated if genetic variations in the WNT family members and RUNX2 are associated with craniofacial maturation, investigating dental and skeletal maturity in children and teenagers.

Methods

Radiographs from pre-orthodontic treatment of Brazilian patients (7 to 17 years-old) were used to assess dental (panoramic radiographs) and skeletal maturity (cephalometric radiographs). The chronological age (CA) was calculated based on the date of birth and the time the radiographs were performed. For the dental maturity analysis, the Demirjian (1973) method was used and a delta [dental age - chronological age (DA-CA)] was calculated. For the skeletal maturity analysis, the Baccetti et al. (2005) method was used and the patients were classified as “delayed skeletal maturation”, “advanced skeletal maturation” or “normal skeletal maturation”. DNA isolated from buccal cells was used for genotyping of two genetic variations in WNT family genes: rs708111 (G > A) in WNT3A and rs1533767 (G > A) in WNT11; and two genetic variations in RUNX2: rs1200425 (G > A) and rs59983488 (G > T). A statistical analysis was performed and values of p < 0.05 indicated a significant difference.

Results

There were no associations between dental maturity and genotypes (p > 0.05). In the skeletal maturity analysis, the allele A in the rs708111 (WNT3A) was statistically more frequent in patients with delayed skeletal maturation (Prevalence Ratio = 1.6; 95% Confidence Interval = 1.00 to 2.54; p-value = 0.042).

Conclusions

The rs708111 in the WNT3A gene impacts on skeletal maturation.

Peer Review reports

Background

The success of orthodontic treatment in children and teenagers depends on an accurate evaluation of a patient’s growth stages, once the treatment of skeletal malocclusions is influenced by growth [1, 2]. Craniofacial growth and development in humans are controlled by complex processes with several and constant interactions among different molecular factors [3]. These events are genetically determined from the individuals’ conception to their maturation [4, 5].

Biological indicators of growth are useful biomarkers to evaluate the growth stages of children and teenagers and to diagnose changes in growth pattern [6]. The dental maturation analysis rates the degree of maturation of teeth using image examinations [7,8,9]. Skeletal maturation analysis by cephalometric radiograph has received growing interest as a biological indicator of bone maturation in the past years. The morphological changes of cervical vertebrae during growth has been used as a biological indicator for assessing skeletal maturation in orthodontic patients [10, 11].

Wnt signaling pathway orchestrates an essential role in the development and homeostasis of several tissues [12]. WNT signaling members, in the canonical pathway, inhibit the degradation of β-catenin, a transcriptional activator that regulates the expression of important genes for craniofacial bone and dental development [12]. WNT3A is one of the most studied canonical members [13], that presents an involvement in both osteogenesis- and odontogenesis-related cell differentiation [14]. Non-canonical Wnt signaling is calcium-dependent with activation of WNT11 promoting bone and dental morphogenesis [13, 15, 16]. The canonical and noncanonical WNT pathways stimulate RUNX2 expression [17, 18]. RUNX2 is an important protein in dental and skeletal development [19, 20], and WNT3a and WNT11 enhance the expression and function of RUNX2, promoting osteo- and odontoblastic differentiation [21, 22].

Several factors have been associated with variations in dental and bone development, such as nutritional factors [23,24,25] and hormonal deficiencies [26, 27]. However, the role of genetic variations on craniofacial bone and dental development have been poorly explored [28, 29]. Genetic variations in WNT3A, WNT11 and RUNX2 have already been associated with skeletal malocclusions [28] and may also be associated with bone and dental maturity. Therefore, this study evaluated the association between craniofacial maturation and genetic variations in WNT family members and RUNX2, investigating dental and skeletal maturity in children and teenagers.

Methods

This cross-sectional study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Genetic Association study (STREGA) statement checklist [30]. This project was previously approved by the Human Ethics Committee of the University of ************************* (01451418.3.0000.5419). Patients whose legal guardian consented to their participation, and those who gave assent to study participation, were eligible to participate.

Two sample-size calculations were performed through G*Power Version 3.1.9.6 (Franz Faul, Universität Kiel, Germany). The difference between two independent means with the parameters of alpha = 5% and power = 80% was used for both calculations. The first calculation for skeletal maturation predicts a minimum sample 100 patients (Cohen’s D = 0.37), considering 20% of loss rate. The effect size was obtained from the data by Costacurta et al. [31]. The second calculation for dental maturation predicts a minimum of 77 patients (Cohen’s D = 0.72), considering a loss rate of 20%. The effect size was obtained from Hilgers et al. [32].

Brazilian children and teenagers 7 to 17 years-old, both genders, biologically unrelated, and undergoing orthodontic treatment were screened from 2015 to 2017. Patients with previous orthodontic and/or orthopedic treatments, previous craniofacial trauma, congenital alterations, and/or metabolic disorders were not included.

The chronological age (CA) of each individual was calculated based on the date of birth on official documents and the time the radiographs were performed.

Dental maturity analysis

For the dental maturity analysis, panoramic radiographs from patients between 7 and 16 years-old were assessed. The Demirjian et al. [8] method was used to investigate the dental maturation and to establish dental maturity. 10% of the radiographs were assessed twice by two observers, which were trained by a senior orthodontist. Weighted Cohen’s Kappa test was performed to each evaluated tooth to test intra- and inter-observer reliability. The Kappa scores ranged from 0.82 to 1.00 for intra-observer reliability and 0.79 to 1.00 for inter-observer reliability.

If a missing tooth (dental agenesis) was found in the left side, the contralateral permanent tooth of the right side was evaluated. The child was excluded from the study if bilateral congenital agenesis was found. Dental maturity was measured subtracting the dental age (DA) from chronological age (DA - CA). Values close to or equal to 0 indicate that patient have dental maturity coincident with the chronological age. Values far from 0 indicate that the patient has a delayed (negative values) or advanced (positive values) dental maturity.

Skeletal maturity analysis

For the skeletal maturity analysis, cephalometric radiographs from patients aged 7 to 17 years-old were assessed. The method according to Baccetti et al. [33] was used to investigate skeletal maturation. 10% of the radiographs were assessed twice by two observers, which were trained by a senior orthodontist. Weighted Cohen’s Kappa test was performed to test the intra- and inter-observer reliability, which was equal to 0.783 and 0.823, respectively.

The patients were classified as “delayed skeletal maturation”, “advanced skeletal maturation” or “normal skeletal maturation” depending on the result of Baccetti’s analysis and chronological age. The study of Schoretsaniti et al. [34] was used to establish a parameter to this classification for boys and girls separately, which is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Estimated age for the boys and girls for each skeletal maturation score
Full size table

DNA extraction and genotyping

Genomic DNA isolated from buccal epithelial cells was used for genotyping analysis. The saliva samples were collected from each child using saline solution, which was used to rinse [33]. Genomic DNA was then extracted as previously described [35]. The concentration and purity of the genomic DNA was determined by spectrophotometry (Nanodrop 1000; Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA).

Two genetic variations in WNT family genes, rs708111 (G > A) in WNT3A and rs1533767 (G > A) in WNT11, and two genetic variations in RUNX2, rs1200425 (G > A) and rs59983488 (G > T), were chose. These genetic variants were selected due to their potential relevance in osteogenesis and odontogenesis-related cell differentiation [28, 36]. Genotyping was blindly performed with the Taqman™ method for real-time PCR in the StepOnePlus™ (Applied Biosystems™, Foster City, CA, USA) as previously described [35]. 10% of the sample were genotyped twice and an agreement of 100% was observed.

Statistical analysis

Dental maturity (delta DA - CA) was evaluated as a continuous variable, while skeletal maturity was evaluated as a categorical variable. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare dental maturity between genders, and Chi-square test was used to compare skeletal maturity between genders using IBM SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp. Armonk, USA). Chi-square test was also applied to calculate the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

To determine the agreement between CA and DA, a Bland-Altman analysis was performed. A Bland-Altman plot was generated (Fig. 1) and a linear regression was performed to evaluate proportional bias between CA and DA [37]. The linear regression indicated that a bias exists between CA and DA estimated by Demirjian (p = 0.018) that shows an overestimation of the method.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Bland-Altman Plot

Full size image

The allelic and genotypic distributions between skeletal maturation groups were performed by PLINK 1.9 software using chi-square or Fisher tests. Prevalence Ratios (PR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI) were calculated for genotype distribution among skeletal maturity groups. Mann-Whitney U test was applied for dental maturation values according to the genotypes.

Values of p < 0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference.

Results

The Fig. 2 shows the flow diagram for both sets. Among the 152 patients screened, 79 were included for the dental maturity set, and 101 were included for the skeletal maturity set. Table 2 shows the comparison of skeletal maturity and dental maturity between genders. There are no differences between gender in both sets (p > 0.05). The Demirjian method overestimated the age of patients in 0.75 years, on average.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Flow diagram for both sets

Full size image
Table 2 Characteristics of the both studied sets
Full size table

The studied genetic variants were within the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p > 0.05).

The studied genetic variants in WNT3A, WNT11 and RUNX2 were not associated with dental maturity (p > 0.05). The results are presented in the Table 3.

Table 3 Means of delta (DA-CA) according to the genotypes for the dental maturity set
Full size table

Table 4 shows genotype and allele distribution among skeletal maturity groups. For rs708111 (WNT3A), the allele (A) was statistically more frequent in patients with delayed skeletal maturation than the wildtype allele (G) (PR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.00 to 2.54; p = 0.042). There was no association between skeletal maturity and the genetic variants rs1533767 (WNT11), rs1200425 and rs59983488 (RUNX2).

Table 4 Genotype distribution among skeletal maturity groups
Full size table

Discussion

In order to successfully treat patients, orthodontists require a comprehensive understanding of craniofacial growth and development. This knowledge allows them to identify specific growth phases and accurately estimate the remaining growth, aiding successful treatment outcomes. Therefore, the orthodontist needs to analyze the developmental status of each patient [1]. Although it is well known that genes play an important role in growth and development [38, 39], the function of key genes on dental and skeletal maturity have not been completely investigated yet. Thus, in the present study, we investigated if genetic variations in WNT family members and RUNX2 impact dental and skeletal maturation.

Demirjian’s method [8] is the most widespread method to assess dental maturation / dental age, and was used to assess dental maturity in our study. However, the overestimation of the method is an important bias not only observed in this study, but also in another Brazilian sample [40], and in a systematic review with global population [41]. The overestimation may explain the proportional bias in this study between CA and DA shown through Bland-Altman analysis. The overestimation may also be due to the fact that the method being created to a French–Canadian data set. Genetic, socioeconomic and environmental variations observed in different counties may generate inconsistencies in this method, when applied in other populations [41].

The skeletal maturation assessment through morphologic alterations in cervical vertebrae has been receiving growing interest in clinical orthodontics, since it prevents an additional X-ray exposition for the patient and the pubertal spurt of facial bones coincides with the spurt of skeletal growth [1, 2]. Although the method is not considered the gold standard and the reproducibility is questionable [2], Baccetti’s method is used worldwide to predict the remaining growth of children and teenagers. In this study, we complement Baccetti’s method with the investigation of Schoretsaniti et al. [34], which observed a mean and confidence interval of chronological age for each stage of growth according to Baccetti. We observed that 42.60% of the sample were classified with a skeletal maturation alteration, in which 27.70% classified as delayed skeletal maturation.

WNT3A and WNT11 are important signalizing mediators involved in the transcription activation of many genes [42], such as RUNX2 [21]. These proteins have already been associated with osteogenesis- and odontogenesis-related cell differentiation [14,15,16]. WNT3A induces dental follicle cell differentiation in cementoblastic/osteoblastic cells, acting directly in tooth and bone development in murine model [14]. WNT11 is also involved in odontoblast and osteogenic cell differentiation [15, 16]. Moreover, in vitro studies demonstrated that WNT11 and WNT3A are associated with the increase in expression and function of RUNX2 [17, 18]. When added exogenously in cultured rat primary osteoblast and mesenchymal stem cells, WNT3A and WNT11 elevate the levels of RUNX2, which promotes osteoblastic differentiation and mineralization [17, 18]. Interestingly, β-catenin, the central component of the WNT canonical pathway, was associated with odontoblastic differentiation of dental pulp cells through RUNX2 activation [22]. The association between RUNX2 and WNT noncanonical pathway on dental development is still under investigation, however, the proteins have already been separately associated with odontoblastic differentiation [19, 43]. In this way, we hypothesized that genetic variations in WNT3A, WNT11 and RUNX2 might impact dental and skeletal development and maturation time.

We investigated only one genetic variation in WNT3A and WNT11 genes, which can be a limitation of this study. The variant allele (A) of the rs708111 (WNT3A) has already been associated with growth patterns/skeletal malocclusion [28]. In our study, this allele was associated with delayed skeletal maturation. The rs708111 (WNT3A) variant is located in a regulatory region [44], thus, it is reasonable to hypothesize that this variation alters the expression of WNT3A mediator and impact the skeletal development [45]. The rs1533767 in WNT11 gene is a silent mutation [44]. This variation may change the mRNA processing impacting the exonic splicing enhancer [45]. This variant has already been associated with skeletal pattern [28], and as a protective factor for oral cancer [36]. In this study, the rs1533767 in WNT11 was not associated with dental nor skeletal maturity. It is possible to hypothesize that other genetic variations in WNT family members affect dental maturity. Therefore, future studies should focus in the evaluation of the impact of these genes on dental maturity.

The genetic variations rs1200425 and rs59983488 in RUNX2 were previously associated with skeletal malocclusion [28] and were selected for investigation in this study. The rs1200425 is an intronic variant that may induce aberrant mRNA splicing, and rs59983488 is an upstream variant, which is located 5’ UTR of the gene [39]. An upstream variant may affect directly the gene expression level [28]. In this study, these genetic variants were not associated with dental and skeletal maturation. Due to the impact of these variants on craniofacial development showed by previous results [28, 46], future studies should investigate their impact on dental and skeletal phenotypes in other populations.

Conclusion

The rs708111 in WNT3A gene impacts the skeletal maturation. This genetic variation may predict skeletal maturation delay and impact the orthodontic treatment plan. In the future, orthodontists may be able to use genetic biomarkers to predict the growth potential of each patient.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Nandaa RS. The contributions of craniofacial growth to clinical orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2000;117:553–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rebouças PRM, Alencar CRB, Arruda MJA, et al. Identification of dental calcification stages as a predictor of skeletal development phase. Dent Press J Orthod. 2021;26:e2119292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cameron N, Schell L, editors. Human growth and development. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bogin B, editor. Patterns of human growth. Vol 88. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Walker SP, Wachs TD, Gardner JM, et al. Child development: risk factors for adverse outcomes in developing countries. The lancet. 2007;369:145–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cameron N. The measurement of human growth. In: Cameron N, Schell L, editors. Human growth and development. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 2021. pp. 317–45.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cobourne MT. The genetic control of early odontogenesis. Br J Orthod. 1999;26:21–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973;211–27.

  9. Surendran S, Thomas E. Tooth mineralization stages as a diagnostic tool for assessment of skeletal maturity. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014;145:7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cericato GO, Bittencourt MAV, Paranhos LR. Validity of the assessment method of skeletal maturation by cervical vertebrae: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2015;44:20140270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Santiago RC, de Miranda Costa LF, Vitral RWF, Fraga MR, Bolognese AM, Maia LC. Cervical vertebral maturation as a biologic indicator of skeletal maturity: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2012;82:1123–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rim EY, Clevers H, Nusse R. The wnt pathway: from signaling mechanisms to synthetic modulators. Annu Rev Biochem. 2022;91:571–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ackers I, Malgor R. Interrelationship of canonical and non-canonical wnt signalling pathways in chronic metabolic diseases. Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research. 2018;15:3–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nemoto E, Sakisaka Y, Tsuchiya M, et al. Wnt3a signaling induces murine dental follicle cells to differentiate into cementoblastic/osteoblastic cells via an osterix-dependent pathway. J Periodontal Res. 2016;51:164–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Koizumi Y, Kawashima N, Yamamoto M, et al. Wnt11 expression in rat dental pulp and promotional effects of W nt signaling on odontoblast differentiation. Congenit Anom. 2013;53:101–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu S, Zhang E, Yang M, Lu L. Overexpression of Wnt11 promotes chondrogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in synergism with TGF-β. Mol Cell Biochem. 2014;390:123–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhu JH, Liao YP, Li FS, et al. Wnt11 promotes BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation through BMPs/Smads and p38 MAPK in mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119:9462–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu ML, Bi CWC, Liu EYL, Dong TTX, Tsim KWK. Wnt3a induces the expression of acetylcholinesterase during osteoblast differentiation via the Runx2 transcription factor. J Biol Chem. 2017;292:12667–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Camilleri S, McDonald F. Runx2 and dental development. Eur J Oral Sci. 2006;114:361–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Komori T. Signaling networks in RUNX2-dependent bone development. J Cell Biochem. 2011;112:750–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gaur T, Lengner CJ, Hovhannisyan H, et al. Canonical WNT signaling promotes osteogenesis by directly stimulating Runx2 gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:33132–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Han N, Zheng Y, Li R, et al. β-catenin enhances odontoblastic differentiation of dental pulp cells through activation of Runx2. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e88890.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Nicholas CL, Kadavy K, Holton NE, Marshall T, Richter A, Southard T. Childhood body mass index is associated with early dental development and eruption in a longitudinal sample from the Iowa Facial Growth Study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2018;154:72–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sadeghianrizi A, Forsberg C-M, Marcus C, Dahllöf G. Craniofacial development in obese adolescents. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27:550–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Modesto A, Jacas CA, Kim SM, et al. Childhood obesity, genetic variation, and dental age. Pediatr Dent. 2019;41:132–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vallejo-Bolaños E, España‐López AJ, Muñoz‐Hoyos A, Fernandez‐Garcia JM. The relationship between bone age, chronological age and dental age in children with isolated growth hormone deficiency. Int J Pediatr Dent. 1999;9:201–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kjellberg H, Beiring M, Wikland KA. Craniofacial morphology, dental occlusion, tooth eruption, and dental maturity in boys of short stature with or without growth hormone deficiency. Eur J Oral Sci. 2000;108:359–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Küchler EC, Reis CLB, Carelli J, et al. Potential interactions among single nucleotide polymorphisms in bone-and cartilage‐related genes in skeletal malocclusions. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021;24:277–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Küchler EC, Reis CLB, Silva-Sousa AC, et al. Exploring the association between genetic polymorphisms in genes involved in craniofacial development and isolated tooth agenesis. Front Physiol. 2021;12:723105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Little J, Higgins JPT, Ioannidis JPA, et al. STrengthening the REporting of genetic Association Studies (STREGA)—an extension of the STROBE statement. Genetic epidemiology. The Official Publication of the International Genetic Epidemiology Society. 2009;33:581–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Costacurta M, Sicuro L, Di Renzo L, Condò R, De Lorenzo A, Docimo R. Childhood obesity and skeletal-dental maturity. Eur J Pediatr Dentistry. 2012;13:128–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hilgers KK, Akridge M, Scheetz JP, Kinane DF. Childhood obesity and dental development. Pediatr Dent. 2006;28:18–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod. 2005;11:119–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Schoretsaniti L, Mitsea A, Karayianni K, Sifakakis I. Cervical vertebral maturation method: reproducibility and efficiency of chronological age estimation. Appl Sci. 2021;11:3160.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Küchler EC, Tannure PN, Falagan-Lotsch P, Lopes TS, Granjeiro JM, Amorim LMF. Buccal cells DNA extraction to obtain high quality human genomic DNA suitable for polymorphism genotyping by PCR-RFLP and real-time PCR. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20:467–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. de Freitas EM, Machado RA, de Moura Santos E, et al. Polymorphisms associated with oral clefts as potential susceptibility markers for oral and breast cancer. Arch Oral Biol. 2019;99:9–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Esan TA, Schepartz LA. Accuracy of the Demirjian and Willems methods of age estimation in a black southern african population. Leg Med. 2018;31:82–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Reis CLB, Barbosa MCF, Henklein S, et al. Nutritional status is associated with permanent tooth eruption in a group of brazilian school children. Global Pediatr Health. 2021;8:2333794X211034088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Küchler EC, Reis CLB, Marañón-Vásquez G, et al. Parathyroid hormone gene and genes involved in the maintenance of vitamin D levels association with mandibular retrognathism. J Personalized Med. 2021;11:369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Eid RMR, Simi R, Friggi MNP, Fisberg M. Assessment of dental maturity of brazilian children aged 6 to 14 years using Demirjian’s method. Int J Pediatr Dent. 2002;12:423–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Jayaraman J, Wong HM, King NM, Roberts GJ. The french–canadian data set of Demirjian for dental age estimation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Forensic Leg Med. 2013;20:373–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Silvério KG, Davidson KC, James RG, et al. Wnt/β-catenin pathway regulates bone morphogenetic protein (BMP2)‐mediated differentiation of dental follicle cells. J Periodontal Res. 2012;47:309–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Xiang L, Chen M, He L, et al. Wnt5a regulates dental follicle stem/progenitor cells of the periodontium. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014;5:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Menezes R, Letra A, Kim AH, et al. Studies with wnt genes and nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate. Birth defects Research Part A. Clin Mol Teratology. 2010;88:995–1000.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Riethoven J-JM. Regulatory regions in DNA: promoters, enhancers, silencers, and insulators. Comput biology transcription factor binding. 2010;674:33–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Reis CLB, Marañón-Vásquez GA, Matsumoto MAN, Baratto-Filho F, Stuani MBS, Proff P, Kirschneck C, Küchler E. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in odontogenesis-related genes associated with tooth-size discrepancy. Australasian Orthodontic Journal. 2023;39:86–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES), Alexander-von-Humboldt-Foundation and The São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP).

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001, Alexander-von-Humboldt-Foundation, and The São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) (CLBR 2021/02704-1). Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    Caio Luiz Bitencourt Reis, Mirian Aiko Nakane Matsumoto, Maria Bernadete Sasso Stuani & Fábio Lourenço Romano

  2. School of Dentistry, Tuiuti University of Paraná, Paraná, Brazil

    Flares Baratto-Filho

  3. School of Dentistry, Univille University, Joinville, Brazil

    Flares Baratto-Filho

  4. Department of Stomatology, Federal University of Paraná, Paraná, Brazil

    Rafaela Scariot

  5. Department of Oral Diagnosis, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil

    Ricardo Della Coletta

  6. Department of Clinic and Surgery, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil

    Daniela Silva Barroso de Oliveira

  7. Department of Orthodontics, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany

    Peter Proff, Christian Kirschneck & Erika Calvano Küchler

Authors
  1. Caio Luiz Bitencourt Reis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mirian Aiko Nakane Matsumoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Flares Baratto-Filho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rafaela Scariot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maria Bernadete Sasso Stuani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fábio Lourenço Romano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ricardo Della Coletta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Daniela Silva Barroso de Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Peter Proff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Christian Kirschneck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Erika Calvano Küchler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: C.L.B.R, M.A.N.M, E.C.K.; Data curation: M.A.N.M., M.B.S.S.; E.C.K.; Sample recruitment: M.A.N.M, F.B., M.B.S.S.; Laboratorial analysis: E.C.K.; R.S.; Radiographic analysis: C.L.B.R, M.A.N.M; Formal analysis: C.L.B.R, E.C.K.; Funding acquisition: F.B., R.S., R.D.C., P.P., C.K., E.C.K.; Investigation: C.L.B.R., E.C.K.; Methodology: M.A.N.M, F.B., E.C.K.; D.S.B.O.; C.L.B.R.; Project administration: M.A.N.M., M.B.S.S., C.K., E.C.K.; Resources: R.S., R.D.C., P.P., C.K., E.C.K.; Software: C.L.B.R.; D.S.B.O.; Supervision: M.A.N.M.; M.B.S.S., C.K., E.C.K., D.S.B.O.; Validation: E.C.K.; Visualization: C.L.B.R; E.C.K; C.K. Roles/Writing - original draft: C.L.B.R., E.C.K.; Writing - review & editing: C.L.B.R., M.A.N.M., M.B.S.S., F.B., R.S., M.B.S.S., R.C., D.S.B.O., P.P., C.K., E.C.K.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Kirschneck.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The project was previously approved by the Human Ethics Committee of the ********************** (01451418.3.0000.5419). Informed consent/assent was obtained from all participants and/or their legal guardians where age-appropriate.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bitencourt Reis, C.L., Nakane Matsumoto, M.A., Baratto-Filho, F. et al. Impact of genetic variations in the WNT family members and RUNX2 on dental and skeletal maturation: a cross-sectional study. Head Face Med 19, 26 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-023-00372-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-023-00372-3

Keywords

Head & Face Medicine

ISSN: 1746-160X

Contact us