Skip to main content

Bi-institutional analysis of microbiological spectrum and therapeutic management of parotid abscesses

Abstract

Background

A parotid abscess (PA) is a complication of an acute bacterial parotitis with a potentially life-threatening course. To date, data on the diagnosis and therapy of PA is sparse and mostly consists of case reports or case series. Therefore, this study aimed at comprehensively analyzing the microbiological spectrum and the therapeutic management in a bi-institutional setting.

Methods

A retrospective clinical chart review was performed to identify all patients surgically treated for PA at two tertiary care centers in Germany. Data on demographics, clinical management and microbiological data including species identification, pathogenicity, type of antibiotic therapy, adjustment of antibiotics, antibiotic sensitivity testing, and smear test results were extracted. Intervention-related variables and etiology were analyzed for their statistical association with outcome variables.

Results

Overall, 85 patients were included. Most patients (92.9%) underwent surgical incision. Around half of the patients (45.9%) were treated under local anesthesia. No facial nerve palsy was observed. The most frequently detected pathogens were Streptococci (n = 23), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (n = 6) including one case of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Most patients (68.2%) received an aminopenicillin ± beta-lactamase inhibitor as empiric antibiotic therapy. In 6 cases the antibiotic therapy was modified after receiving the antibiogram. Four patients (5.2%) presented with recurrent PA. Etiology was idiopathic (42.4%), followed by tumorous (12.9%), obstructive, and immunosuppressive (each 11.8%). Patients with a dental focus (p = 0.007) had a longer duration of hospitalization.

Conclusion

The results show that the surgical therapy of PA under local anesthesia is safe. A dental examination should routinely be performed to rule out a dental focus. Obtaining a microbiological specimen in order to modify antibiotic therapy if necessary and a histopathological specimen to rule out a tumorous etiology is obligate.

Peer Review reports

Background

Acute bacterial parotitis accounts for approximately 1.5 out of 10,000 hospital admissions [1]. One of the most relevant and serious complications of acute bacterial parotitis is a parotid abscess (PA). Mainly due to the close anatomical relationship between the parotid gland and the facial nerve, a PA represents a therapeutic challenge in clinical practice. A PA is characterized by a localized collection of pus within the parotid gland, resulting from acute purulent sialadenitis, generally caused by ascending infection via Stensen’s duct or bacteremia [2]. Prompt diagnosis and appropriate management are crucial to prevent complications such as septicemia, osteomyelitis, mediastinitis or facial nerve palsy [3,4,5].

Previously identified bacterial pathogens are Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus spp., and Haemophilus influenza [6]. Other bacteria, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and anaerobic organisms, have been identified in rare cases [7, 8]. Known risk factors for PA include poor oral hygiene, immune deficiency, sialolithiasis, ductal obstruction, dehydration, and malnutrition [7]. Therapeutic management consists of systemic antibiotics and interventional procedures like surgical incision and drainage or ultrasound-guided needle aspiration [9]. Interventional therapy can be performed under local or general anesthesia depending on patient-specific risk factors (e.g., advanced age, multimorbidity) and the hospital’s standard protocol.

Although there are several studies describing the therapy of PA, most of these are case reports or series [10] resulting in insufficient evidence on the correct treatment and analysis of microbiological data. It is worth noting that a recent systematic review was conducted [10]. However, due to the limited size of case series and the heterogeneous nature of the data, a meta-analysis was not feasible. Moreover, the scarcity of available data has prevented thorough statistical analyses regarding influential factors and outcome variables [10]. Additionally, there is a dearth of comprehensive studies on the etiology of parotid abscesses, mainly due to the small size of previous series. Consequently, the systematic review refrains from drawing conclusions on this matter [10].

Therefore, this bi-institutional study aimed at comprehensively elucidating the etiology, the microbiological spectrum, and treatment strategies of PA to improve patient outcomes and clinical decision-making in the management of PA.

Methods

All patients diagnosed with PA at the departments of otolaryngology/head and neck surgery of the university hospital Cologne and the university hospital Munich between January 2012 and April 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Diagnosis has been made based on clinical findings and ultrasound in all cases. If necessary for preoperative planning, a CT scan of the head and neck has been performed, additionally. Incision and drainage with drain insertion and antibiotic treatment was the standard of care in both institutions. Ultrasound-guided needle aspiration was performed in case of an abscess with a maximum diameter of 1.0 cm and no sonographic proof of residual pus after aspiration. Drain placement was omitted in case of ultrasound-guided needle aspiration or as individual surgeon’s decision in a limited number of cases. Data on demographics, microbiological aspects and clinical management were collected from the medical records. Patient demographics included sex, age, predisposing factors, and comorbid diseases. Microbiological factors consisted of species identification, pathogenicity, type of antibiotic therapy, adjustment of antibiotics, antibiotic sensitivity testing, and smear test results. Intraoperatively obtained clinical specimen were incubated for 7 days according to standard laboratory protocols. Cultural growth was identified to species level by MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker Daltonic GmbH, Bremen, Germany). Phenotypical resistance was primarily determined by Vitek2® (bioMérieux, Nürtingen, Germany) or, if not successful, by agar disc diffusion each in accordance with EUCAST standards. Results were categorized in dependance of the pathogenicity of the detected species and their combination within the specimen in “highly relevant”,”possibly relevant”, and”probably not relevant”. “Highly relevant” considered were species of the Streptococcus anginosus group, Haemophilus influenzaeStaphylococcus aureusFrancisella tularensis and multiple strict anaerobe species. Polymicrobial specimen containing only physiological oral flora were categorized as “possibly relevant”. Specimen with only 1–2 species of the physiological oral flora of no or low pathogenicity were categorized as "probably not relevant". Species of the oral flora may contribute to PA of course but mainly as co-contributors along with species of higher pathogenicity e.g., Staphylococcus aureus. If solemnly detected without additional pathogenic species the relevance remains questionable and was therefore categorized as "probably not relevant". Data on clinical management included the length of hospital stay, duration of antibiotic administration as well as (surgical) drainage techniques, recurrence rates and complications.

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Cologne (approval code: 23–1252).

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Mac version 29.0.1.0 (171) (IBM, Armonk, NY). Categorical data were presented as percentages, while continuous data were expressed as means. The t-test was used to compare continuous variables, and the chi-squared test was employed to assess the relationship between categorical variables. P-values lower than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Patients’ characteristics

A total of 85 patients with PA were included of whom 42 (49.4%) were female. Mean age was 57.5 years (± 21.2), ranging from 1 to 94 years (Table 1). Among the examined cases, 44 (51.8%) PA were located on the right side. Baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between the two centers. The average hospital stay was 7.3 days (± 4.7), with a range of 0 to 30 days, differing between the two hospitals (6.2 ± 2.9 days vs. 8.4 ± 5.8 days, p = 0.026) and no difference between genders (p = 0.493) or age (≥ 50 vs. < 50 years, p = 0.092).

Table 1 Patients’ characteristics, procedural characteristics, and etiology

Surgery and complications

The majority of patients underwent surgical incision and drainage (79 cases, 92.9%), while six patients were treated with ultrasound-guided needle aspiration of the PA. Figure 1 displays an exemplary sonography image and a CT scan of patients with PA. Local anesthesia was applied in 39 patients (45.9%), while 46 patients (54.1%) underwent surgery under general anesthesia. There was no significant correlation between type of anesthesia and length of hospital stay (p = 0.688). In 77 cases a wound drain was inserted during surgery, which remained for an average of 3.3 days. If a drain was inserted, patients had a significantly longer hospital stay (7.7 days vs. 2.2 days; p = 0.005) (Table 2). Out of all patients, nine (10.6%) experienced postoperative complications, with salivary fistula being the most common in five cases (5.9%), followed by residual inflammation, where two patients presented with residual abscesses found in sonography or computed tomography with no further need for surgical intervention (2.4%) (Table 3). There were no occurrences of postoperative facial nerve palsies in either the local anesthesia or general anesthesia groups. Four patients required postoperative parotidectomy after complete resolution of the acute infection due to superinfected adenolymphoma with initial presentation as PA. Four patients (5.2%) experienced recurrent abscesses during the postoperative course, which required revision surgery within 14 days after initial treatment, of whom in one case abscesses reoccurred four times within the first year. This case represented a one-year-old child with a rare abscessed congenital epidermoid cyst of the parotid gland. After first incision and drainage with drain insertion in general anesthesia the cyst showed recurrent abscess formation for four times within one year. The lesion was finally surgically removed during an infection-free interval and the patient remained recurrence-free since then. Another patient suffered from decompensated heart failure during his treatment of PA.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Sonographic and CT imaging of parotid abscesses. A Coronal and B transverse sonographic images of the left parotid gland displaying a hypoechoic, partly anechoic mass within the parotid gland with partly ill-defined margins and posterior acoustic enhancement and hyperechoic debris in a 60-year-old female patient. C Coronal and D axial CT scan of the neck with contrast displaying a hypodense partly lobulated mass of the right parotid gland (red arrow) with capsular ring enhancement and surrounding inflammatory changes and contact to the sternocleidomastoid muscle and the mandible in a 51-year-old female patient

Table 2 Statistical association between intervention-related variables and outcome variables
Table 3 Complications and recurrence

Etiology and predisposing factors

The majority of abscesses were idiopathic (n = 36, 42.4%), followed by superinfected tumors (n = 11, 12.9%), obstructive etiology (n = 10, 11.8%), and immunosuppression (n = 10, 11.8%). Of the tumors examined, five were adenolymphomas, four parotid cysts, one was a congenital epidermoid cyst, and one squamous cell carcinoma of unknown origin. A dental focus was present in five patients (5.9%). Two PAs were caused by a marantic parotitis and one was posttraumatic (skin lesion). Patients with a dental focus had a significantly longer hospital stay compared to patients with other etiologies (mean of 12.8 vs. 7.0 days; p = 0.007) (Table 4). Among the cases studied, 12 (14.1%) were classified as immunocompromised, based on diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, HIV infection, myelodysplastic syndrome, or immunosuppressive medication (Fig. 2). No significant correlations were detected between immunosuppression and the duration of antibiotics, length of hospital stay, complication rate, recurrence, or the need for parotidectomy.

Table 4 Statistical association between etiological variables and outcome variables
Fig. 2
figure 2

Etiology of parotid abscesses

Microbiological analysis and antibiotics

The majority of patients (n = 58; 68.2%) received an aminopenicillin ± beta-lactamase inhibitor as empiric antibiotic therapy, followed by cefuroxime (n = 13; 15.3%). The mean overall duration of antibiotic therapy (intravenous + oral administration) was 11.2 days, ranging from four to a maximum of 30 days. At one clinical site the duration of antibiotics was significantly longer (9.8 ± 3.9 days vs. 12.4 ± 4.9 days, p = 0.014). In 4 cases no microbiological specimen was taken. In 18 (21.2%) patients the swabs were sterile. No antibiogram was performed in specimen containing normal oral bacterial flora only. In the remaining 45 patients, antibiotic resistance testing was available and in 38 (84.4%) cases, the respective bacteria were susceptible to the empirically used antibiotic agent (Table 5). In 6 cases, the initial antibiotic therapy (Cefuroxime (2x), Aminopenicillin + beta-lactamase inhibitor (2x), Clindamycin (1x), Ciprofloxacin (1x)) was changed according to the antibiogram while in 1 patient the aminopenicillin had to be changed due to allergic reaction. Among the identified pathogens, 51 were classified as “highly relevant”, 27 as “possibly relevant” and 11 as “probably not relevant”. The most frequently detected pathogens were Streptococci of the anginosus group (n = 22), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (n = 6) including one case of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). One parotid abscess contained Francisella tularensis, a zoonotic pathogen typically found in wild animals. Its presence was most likely attributed to a prior car accident with involvement of a wild animal resulting in a skin laceration. Among the species with “possibly relevant” pathogenicity, coagulase-negative Staphylococci (n = 10) and Cutibacterium acnes (n = 7) were the most commonly detected. Additionally, four cases of different Candida species were identified, including one case of Candida glabrata (Table 6). In terms of immune status, the most frequent pathogens among immunocompetent patients were bacteria of the Streptococcus anginosus grp. (n = 20, 27.4%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (n = 4, 5.5%), Parvimonas micra (n = 4, 5.5%), and Eikenella corrodens (n = 4, 5.5%). Among immunocompromised patients, the most frequent pathogens were bacteria of the Streptococcus anginosus grp. (n = 2, 16.7%) and Staphylococcus aureus (n = 2, 16.7%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 1, 8.3%), and Aggregatibacter aphrophilus (n = 1, 8.3%). Thus, the frequency of bacteria of the Streptococcus anginosus grp. was higher among immunocompetent patients, whereas Staphylococcus aureus was more often detected among immunocompromised patients.

Table 5 Antibiotic therapy
Table 6 Pathogens

Characteristics of adults and children with PA

All children (n = 7) and half of the adult patients with PA were treated under general anaesthesia (p = 0.011) (Table 7). Further, a tumorous lesion was identified as etiology in 42.9% (n = 3) of children and only in 10.3% (n = 10) of adults with PA (p = 0.014). No significant differences in terms of complications/recurrence were found when comparing children and adults with PA. Regarding the microbiological spectrum, we found that the most frequent pathogens in adults were bacteria of the Streptococcus anginosus grp. (n = 21, 26.9%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (n = 5, 6.4%), Parvimonas micra (n = 4, 5.1%), and Eikenella corrodens (n = 4, 5.1%). Among children, causative pathogens were bacteria of the Streptococcus anginosus grp. (n = 1, 14.3%), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 1, 14.3%), and Haemophilus influenzae (n = 1, 14.3%).

Table 7 Procedural characteristics, etiology, complications/recurrence in adults versus children with PA

Discussion

This present study displays the largest detailed investigation of etiology, microbiological spectrum, and surgical as well as anti-infective treatment strategies of PA, addressing a clinical challenge in head and neck surgery.

In terms of demographics, our study showed a similar sex distribution with a male predominance compared to prior literature [10]. However, the age distribution slightly differed, with the mean age in this study being 57.5 years compared to the 4th or 5th decade reported by Saibene et al. [10]. The results affirm that PA can arise across all age groups.

Overall, 14.1% of all patients in our study displayed impairment of the immune system. These findings align with prior research, which showed that immunocompromising conditions were a predisposing factor for parotid abscess [11,12,13]. Furthermore, oro-dental issues [14], autoimmune disorders [15], ductal and/or parenchymal disorders [12, 13, 16], superinfected adenolymphoma [17], specific disseminated diseases including melioidosis and tuberculosis [18, 19], and immunodeficiency due to conditions like HIV infection or diabetes mellitus [16, 18, 20] have been described as predisposing factors. Interestingly, although immunosuppression seems to predispose to PA, it did not have an impact on clinical course or complication rate in the present study.

Previous literature, including the review by Saibene et al., lacked detailed information on various etiologies [10]. In contrast, our study extensively investigated the etiology of parotid abscesses, offering comprehensive results that include the frequency of tumors as a contributing factor and showing that patients with a dental focus of PA had a significantly longer hospital stay than those without for the first time. The latter may be due to a lack of awareness of a dental focus as etiology of a PA despite the close anatomical relationship between the teeth of the upper jaw and the parotid gland, and consequently a delayed dental consultation. Therefore, the present data support routinely ruling out a dental focus in case of first diagnosis of PA. Further, a PA was significantly more frequently (p = 0.014) caused by an underlying tumorous lesion in children (42.9%) compared to adults (p = 0.014). Therefore, it seems that obtaining a histological specimen and applying a particularly strict follow-up in children with PA is indicated in order to exclude a possibly congenital parotid tumor as etiology of PA. Although the etiology of a high number of PA was classified as idiopathic in this study, it must be mentioned that ascending infection via Stensen’s duct or bacteremia were assumed to be the main pathomechanisms leading to PA in the previous literature [2]. The exact pathomechanism leading to PA in the cases classified as idiopathic within this study cannot be determined retrospectively.

Therapeutic management strategies involve both the drainage of pus and the administration of an appropriate antibiotic therapy [8, 11, 13, 14, 21]. Our study found abscess incision and drainage to be the most common treatment strategies, followed by aspiration either with or without radiological guidance, according to prior literature [10]. There is no study investigating differences in the type of anesthesia performed in PA. In this study a relevant number of patients underwent surgery under local anesthesia and there was no significant correlation between type of anesthesia and length of hospital stay or complication rate. Notably, neither patients treated under general, nor patients treated under local anesthesia showed postoperative impairment of the facial nerve. These results imply that both, general and local anesthesia, can be applied safely and effectively for surgical treatment of PA. Insertion of a wound drain was significantly associated with a longer hospital stay in the present study. On the other hand, patients without a drain did not show a higher rate of recurrences, more complications or a longer period of antibiotic administration compared to those with intraoperative drain insertion. However, it has to be mentioned that only 2 out of 79 surgically treated patients did not receive a drain. Therefore, the results are not sufficient to answer the question of the necessity of wound drain insertion in the surgical treatment of PA.

At one clinical site the duration of antibiotics was significantly longer (9.8 ± 3.9 days vs. 12.4 ± 4.9 days), which can be explained by a longer average hospital stay at one site compared to the other (6.2 ± 2.9 days vs. 8.4 ± 5.8 days). The most likely reason for this divergence is a more conservative intravenous antibiotic treatment duration at one site compared to the other. This reflects the missing standard of care in the duration of antibiotic treatment of PA. Prospective studies are needed to determine the ideal duration of antibiotic treatment in this disease.

Furthermore, we demonstrated a mean hospital stay of 7.3 ± 4.7 days, which was shorter than previously described in literature (13.8 ± 9.1) [11]. The shorter mean hospital stay seems justifiably against the background of a low recurrence rate of only 5.2% in the present series. Nevertheless, the length of hospital stays and the length of administration of intravenous antibiotics have to be determined depending on clinical and laboratory findings in each individual case.

In literature, antibiotic therapy typically involves aminopenicillin alone or in combination with a beta-lactamase inhibitor or clindamycin combined with third or fourth generation cephalosporins for patients with a high incidence of gram-negative bacterial infections [4, 10,11,12,13,14]. This is consistent with our findings, where most patients received an aminopenicillin alone or in combination with a beta-lactamase inhibitor as empiric antibiotic therapy. The mean antibiotic therapy duration was 11.2 days, consistent with prior literature recommending 10–14 days [5].

In our study, the most frequent postoperative complications were salivary fistulas agreeing with literature findings [9]. Our study revealed no new cases of facial nerve palsy during and after treatment, which was one major, but rare complication described in literature [3, 9, 10]. Furthermore, previous studies reported wound healing problems, which were not observed in our study [10]. Severe complications such as jaw osteomyelitis, temporal lobe abscess [22] craniocervical necrotizing fasciitis [23], descending mediastinitis [24], airway obstruction, septicemia, and septic shock [12, 24, 25] did not occur during the follow-up of our patients.

Prior microbiological profiling of PA revealed common pathogens like Staphylococcus spp., anaerobic bacteria, and Streptococcus spp. [4, 11, 12, 21], consistent with our findings. Furthermore, Klebsiella spp., Haemophilus spp., Enterobacter spp., Prevotella spp., Parvimonas spp., Burkholderia spp., Pseudomonas spp., Mycobacterium spp., non-Mycobacterium spp., Propionibacterium spp., and Brucella spp. have also been isolated in reported cases of PA [4, 6,7,8, 12, 13, 15, 16, 19, 26]. In addition to the previously mentioned pathogens, our study identified Aggregatibacter aphrophilus, Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii, various Candida species, a single instance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and Francisella tularensis – a zoonotic pathogen typically associated with wild animals. It is noteworthy that these pathogens have not been previously detected in cases of parotid abscess according to our knowledge. The high number of specimens containing no microorganisms is consistent with prior findings. One study found 14 of 25 cases of PA with negative bacterial cultures [5]. Prior antibiotic treatment may be the reason for the high number of specimens without detection of microorganisms. Therefore, starting systemic antibiotics after collection of the microbiological specimen may be beneficial to achieve a higher detection rate. Additionally, microbiological analysis of tissue samples instead of swabs could potentially improve the detection rate as well.

We evaluated antibiograms of the examined patients. Among cases where an antibiogram was generated, the empirically selected antibiotic agent aligned with the antibiogram results predominantly. However, in seven instances, the antibiotic therapy had to be modified following the antibiogram, which emphasizes the need of intraoperatively obtaining a microbiological specimen in order to gain precise knowledge about local species distribution and antibiotic resistances in PA. This is of special relevance since in one patient MRSA was isolated.

Moreover, the histopathologic specimen taken during surgical therapy of PA revealed a superinfected neoplasm in ten cases (five adenolymphomas, four parotid cysts, and one squamous cell carcinoma). We therefore strongly advocate considering an infected neoplasm as a differential diagnosis for PA and to routinely obtain a histological specimen in PA in order to exclude a tumorous etiology.

A limitation of this study is the retrospective study design. Additionally, factors as abscess size and the patient’s clinical condition were not considered, which could have influenced the decision of surgical technique and to opt for drainage. Moreover, we were unable to retrospectively ascertain whether antibiotic therapy had been initiated prior to microbiological examination. Further, this study exclusively contained patients with surgically treated PA. Consequently, patients with small PA which have not been captured by ultrasound imaging (i.e., in the deep parotid lobe) and have improved with medical therapy alone are not included. It therefore stays unclear if empirical medical treatment alone may be sufficient for small PA. Despite having a significantly larger case count than previous investigations, the collective size still may not adequately address rarer complications and etiologies, warranting further research in this domain. Larger multicenter studies are recommended for future research to validate and expand upon these results.

To sum up, the present study presents data on the largest described series of patients treated for PA including a comprehensive analysis of microbiological and clinical data. The study confirms that antibiotic agents and drainage are the two crucial pillars of treatment for PA being sufficient to avoid major complications. The results support the safety of surgical therapy of PA under local anesthesia. A dental examination should routinely be performed in case of PA to rule out a dental focus. Obtaining a microbiological specimen in order to modify antibiotic therapy if necessary and obtaining a histopathological specimen to rule out a tumorous etiology seems obligate.

Availability of data and materials

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Fattahi TT, Lyu PE, Sickels JEV. Management of acute suppurative parotitis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;60:446–8. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.31234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Viselner G, van der Byl G, Maira A, et al. Parotid abscess: mini-pictorial essay. J. Ultrasound. 2013;16:11–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-013-0006-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vorrasi J, Zinberg G. Concomitant Suppurative Parotitis and Condylar Osteomyelitis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75:543–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.08.043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kristensen RN, Hahn CH. Facial nerve palsy caused by parotid gland abscess. J Laryngol Otol. 2012;126:322–4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215111002635.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Srivanitchapoom C, Yata K. Clinical characteristics that predict parotid abscess: An observational cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021;64: 102230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brook I. The bacteriology of salivary gland infections. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2009;21:269–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2009.05.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brook I. Acute bacterial suppurative parotitis: microbiology and management. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14:37–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200301000-00006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chi TH, Yuan CH, Chen HS. Parotid abscess: a retrospective study of 14 cases at a regional hospital in Taiwan. B-ENT. 2014;10:315–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Strassen U, Grimler C, Hofauer B. Ultrasound-Guided Needle Aspiration vs Surgical Incision of Parotid Abscesses. J Clin Med. 2022;11:7425. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm1124742.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Saibene AM, Allevi F, Ayad T, et al. Treatment for parotid abscess: a systematic review. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2022;42:106–15. https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N1837.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim YY, Lee DH, Yoon TM, et al. Parotid abscess at a single institute in Korea. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97: e11700. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng L-H, Wang H-W, Lin C-M, et al. Parotid Abscess: 15-Year Experience at a Tertiary Care Referral Center in Taiwan. J Med Sci. 2019;39:231. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmedsci.jmedsci_15_19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tan VES, Goh BS. Parotid abscess: a five-year review – clinical presentation, diagnosis and management. J Laryngol Otol. 2007;121:872–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215106004166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lakshmi Narayana M, Azeem Mohiyuddin SM, Mohammadi K, et al. Parotid abscess in children – A tertiary rural hospital experience. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79:1988–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.10.021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yolbaş S, Bozgeyik Z, Artaş G, et al. Parotid abscess secondary to brucellosis in a patient with primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Eur J Rheumatol. 2018;5:62–4. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjrheum.2017.16063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sherman JA. Pseudomonas parotid abscess. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59:833–5. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2001.24312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Leibowitz JM, Montone KT, Basu D. Warthin tumor presenting as a fungal abscess in an immunocompetent host: case report and review of the literature. Head Neck. 2010;32:133–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21075.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee I-K, Liu J-W. Tuberculous parotitis: case report and literature review. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005;114:547–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940511400710.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mahawerawat K, Kasemsiri P. Clinical presentation and treatment of melioidosis in the head and neck region. J Laryngol Otol. 2018;132:827–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215118001391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Scattergood S, Moore S, Prior A, et al. Percutaneous drainage of a parotid gland abscess under contrast-enhanced ultrasound guidance: A case report. Ultrasound. 2018;26:182–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742271X18766705.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ganesh R, Leese T. Parotid abscess in Singapore. Singapore Med J. 2005;46:553–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kishore R, Ramachandran K, Ngoma C, et al. Unusual complication of parotid abscess. J Laryngol Otol. 2004;118:388–90. https://doi.org/10.1258/002221504323086642.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marioni G, Bottin R, Tregnaghi A, et al. Craniocervical necrotizing fasciitis secondary to parotid gland abscess. Acta Otolaryngol. 2003;123:737–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480310000430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brito TP, Guimarães AC, Oshima MM, et al. Mediastinitis: parotid abscess complication. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;80:268–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2013.03.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Pokharel M, Dhakal A, Rajbhandari P, et al. A study of Deep Neck Space Infections at Kathmandu University Dhulikhel Hospital. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2021;19:57–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kay-Rivest E, Bouhabel S, Oughton MT, et al. Medical Management for the Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Infection of the Parotid Gland: Avoiding Surgery May Be Possible. Case Rep Med. 2016;2016:4324525. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4324525.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: M.M., L.N., J.P.K, P.W.; Data curation: M.M., L.N., A.L., S.V.W.; Formal analysis: M.M., J.E.; Investigation: M.M., J.E., A.L., S.S., S.V.W.,L.N.; Methodology: P.W., J.P.K., M.C., S.V.W.; Resources: M.C., J.P.K.; Supervision: M.C., J.P.K., P.W.; Validation: S.V.W., A.L., P.W.; Visualization: J.E., M.M.; Writing—original draft: M.M., J.E., L.N.; Writing—review & editing: S.V.W., S.S., A.L., M.C., J.P.K., P.W. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcel Mayer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Cologne (approval code: 23–1252).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mayer, M., Esser, J., Walker, S.V. et al. Bi-institutional analysis of microbiological spectrum and therapeutic management of parotid abscesses. Head Face Med 20, 38 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-024-00438-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-024-00438-w

Keywords