Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Alveolar ridge keratosis - a retrospective clinicopathological study

  • Lorenzo Bellato1,
  • Carla P Martinelli-Kläy1, 2,
  • Celso R Martinelli2 and
  • Tommaso Lombardi1Email author
Head & Face Medicine20139:12

https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-9-12

Received: 8 March 2013

Accepted: 4 April 2013

Published: 16 April 2013

Abstract

Background

Alveolar ridge keratosis (ARK) is a distinct, benign clinicopathological entity, characterized by a hyperkeratotic plaque or patch that occurs on the alveolar edentulous ridge or on the retromolar trigone, considered to be caused by chronic frictional trauma. The aim of this retrospective study is to present the clinicopathological features of 23 consecutive cases of ARK.

Material and methods

The 23 biopsy samples of ARK were selected and pathological features were revised (keratosis, acanthosis, surface architecture, and inflammation). Factors such as the patient’s gender, age, anatomical location, tobacco and alcohol use were analyzed.

Results

Sixteen out of the 23 cases studied were men and 7 women with a mean age of 55.05 (age ranged from 17 to 88 years). Thirteen cases had a history of tobacco habit, amongst whom, 4 also presented alcohol consumption. All the cases presented only unilateral lesions. Nineteen cases involved the retromolar trigone while 4 cases involved edentulous alveolar ridges. When observed microscopically, the lesions were mainly characterized by moderate to important hyperorthokeratosis. Inflammation was scanty or absent. In four of the cases, the presence of melanin pigment in the superficial corium or in the cytoplasm of macrophages was detected. None of the cases showed any features of dysplasia.

Conclusion

Our results reveal that ARK is a benign lesion. However, the high prevalence of smokers amongst the patients might suggest that some potentially malignant disorders such as tobacco associated leukoplakia may clinically mimic ARK.

Keywords

Alveolar ridge keratosisHyperkeratosisOral leukoplakiaOral squamous cell carcinoma

Introduction

Alveolar ridge keratosis (ARK) is a lesion considered a distinct benign clinicopathological entity[1, 2]. It has also been referred to as benign alveolar ridge keratosis (BARK)[3, 4]. Clinically, ARK features a hyperkeratotic plaque or patch occurring on the alveolar edentulous ridge or on the retromolar trigone pad, believed to be caused by chronic frictional trauma (e.g. trauma during mastication). It can be compared to a callus on the skin[1] or may resemble the lichen simplex chronicus (LSC) of the skin[3], a lesion caused by chronic frictional injury. Histologically, the lesional epithelium shows hyperorthokeratosis, acanthosis and wedge-shaped hypergranulosis, and the surface can be slightly verruciform or corrugated. The inflammation ranges from absent to scanty. Although ARK is a benign entity, some potentially malignant disorders may clinically mimic it, such as idiopathic or tobacco associated leukoplakia[2].

Through this study, we present the clinicopathological features of 23 consecutive cases of ARK retrieved from our file.

Material and method

The biopsy samples of ARK were selected from the archives of the Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Geneva, Switzerland. As retrospective study approval by the local institutional review board was not requested.

The 23 cases presented a clinical history of leukoplakia or white plaque lesion (keratosis) without erythema or ulceration limited to the retromolar trigone or the alveolar ridge region. In each case, the patient´s gender, age, anatomical location, tobacco and alcohol habit were evaluated. Pathological features were revised. These included the presence of keratosis, acanthosis, surface architecture, and inflammation.

Results

Out of 23 cases, 16 were men and 7 were women (Table 1). The mean age was 55.05 (range 17–88 years); 19 cases (82.6%) occurred on the retromolar trigone (Figure 1), and 4 on edentulous alveolar ridges (17.4%). All the cases were unilateral lesions. A history of tobacco habit was present in 13 cases (56.5%), out of which 4 (17.4%) also presented an association with alcohol consumption. Only one case had no data available about tobacco (Table 1). Histologically, 22 out of 23 biopsies showed a moderate to important hyperorthokeratosis with wedge-shaped hypergranulosis (Figure 2A); only one case featured a hyperparakeratosis (Figure 2B). In addition, a variable acanthosis with some anastomosed epithelial ridges was observed (Figure 2A, B). None of the cases presented epithelial dysplasia. Inflammation was scanty or absent. In four cases were found either melanin pigment deposits or melanophages in the superficial corium (Figure 2C).
Figure 1

Clinical aspect of ARK: white lesion showing a corrugated surface on the retromolar trigone.

Figure 2

Histological aspect of ARK: (A1) marked hyperorthokeratosis without dysplasia, discrete surface papillomatosis and mild acanthosis with elongated ridges, some of them anastomosed. (HES, × 10). (A2) High magnification showing a wedge-shaped hypergranulosis. (HES, × 40). (B) Squamous epithelium presenting moderate to marked acanthosis and hyperparakeratosis with some anastomosed epithelial ridges and mild focal inflammation in the subjacent conjunctive tissue. (HES, × 10). (C) Melanin in the epithelium, free and in the cytoplasm of macrophages (HES, × 40).

Table 1

Summary of clinical features of 23 alveolar ridge keratosis patients

Clinical characteristic

N° of patients

(n = 23)

(%)

Gender

 

male

16 (69.6%)

female

7 (30.4%)

Location

 

retromolar trigone

19 (82.6%)

edentulous ridge

4 (17.4%)

Tobacco habit

 

yes

13 (56.5%)

no

9 (39.2%)

no information

1 (4.3%)

Alcohol habit

 

yes

4 (17.4%)

no

16 (69.6%)

no information

3 (13%)

Discussion

ARK is a benign traumatic lesion that has often been included in the leukoplakia category[14]. Woo and Nataraja have proposed the term BARK to emphasize the complete benign nature of ARK[3]. Chi et al. found dysplastic features in 10 out of 477 ARK cases that represented a true oral leukoplakia mimicking ARK[2].

In 2005, the definition of leukoplakia was discussed at the Oral Cancer and Precancer Workshop coordinated by the WHO Collaborating Center[5]. For this group, leukoplakia could be described as “white plaques of questionable risk, having excluded (other) known diseases or disorders that carry no increased risk for cancer”. In addition, its aetiology could be related either to tobacco or to areca nut use, or it might be idiopathic.

Leukoplakia may present some degree of dysplasia and also progress into verrucous carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Studies have shown a frequency from 0.13 to 17.5 percent of malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia[6].

In the present study, the majority of ARK lesions showed hyperorthokeratosis, wedge-shaped hypergranulosis and variable acanthosis, with no dysplastic changes. In all the cases, inflammation was absent or scanty. Therefore, we agree that BARK related to trauma should be considered a distinct entity and consequently be excluded from epidemiological studies on leukoplakia. Nevertheless, other lesions may mimic ARK mainly when there is a history of tobacco habit[2]. In the present cases a high prevalence of smokers (56.5% of cases, see Table 1) was found, suggesting that ARK and tobacco associated leukoplakia (tobacco keratosis) might show the same clinical (and possibly even histological) features. In addition, 4 out of 13 cases that had a tobacco habit were also associated with alcohol consumption. Natarajan and Woo[4] also found a high prevalence of smokers and alcohol users in benign ARK: 13 out of 27 cases were smokers while 6 out of 27 cases were alcohol users. Furthermore, a study that used ARK cases as control samples showed 17% and 20% of positivity to HPV and p16INK4a, respectively. The p16INK4a and HPV are entailed as a potential diagnostic marker for dysplasia and squamous proliferative lesions[7]. Recently, a paper described a series of 14 cases of frictional keratosis with similar features to those present in benign alveolar ridge keratoses, but exclusively located on the vestibular attached gingiva[8]. In these cases, only one had a history of pipe smoking, although he had quit smoking 10 years prior to the presence of the lesion. Yet, a history of a continuous trauma on the gingiva was reported and none of the 14 patients had alcohol consumption.

In some cases, the tobacco use can induce an oral mucosa pigmentation (smoker’s melanosis), in which the melanin can either be located in the basal cell layer of the epithelium or found free in the superficial corium or within macrophages[9]. In our study, 4 out of 13 cases that had a tobacco habit presented melanin pigment deposits in the superficial corium (Figure 2D). It is known that the increase of melanin in smokers is related to the stimulation of the melanocytic cells and that the degree of pigmentation is increased in heavy smokers[9, 10].

Tobacco has a strong association with (SCC) and heavy smokers present seven times more risk of developing cancer than nonsmokers. Its association with alcohol consumption is responsible for a greater proportion of oral cancers[1, 11, 12]. SCC can occur on the retromolar area (Figure 3) or edentulous alveolar ridge. From 225 OSCC cases studied, Kademani et al.[13] found 27 cases (12.4%) occurred on the retromolar trigone. Since early SCC can appear as a white lesion, it is also possible that some lesions (i.e. leukoplakia) may have the same clinical pattern of ARK.
Figure 3

(A) Clinical aspect of a SCC of the retromolar trigone. (B) Histological aspect of the SCC (HES, × 10).

ARK is a benign reactive lesion related to trauma that is difficult in, some cases, to differentiate from a tobacco lesion especially if located on the retromolar area. It is, therefore, possible that tobacco associated leukoplakia (tobacco keratosis) might be considered as ARK. In patients with an ARK it is important to investigate the occurrence of tobacco use and alcohol consumption and to perform a biopsy in order to confirm the diagnosis. We concur with the opinion that benign ARK should not be included in epidemiological studies on leukoplakia.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Division of Stomatology and Oral Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine
(2)
Centre for Diagnosis and Treatment of Oral Diseases

References

  1. Neville BW, Day TA: Oral cancer and precancerous lesions. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002, 52: 195-215. 10.3322/canjclin.52.4.195.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chi AC, Lambert PR, Pan Y, Li R, Vo DT, Edwards E, Gangarosa P, Neville BW: Is alveolar ridge keratosis a true leukoplakia?: A clinicopathologic comparison of 2,153 lesions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007, 138: 641-651.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Woo SB, Natarajan E: Alveolar ridge keratosis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007, 138: 1306-1307.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Natarajan E, Woo SB: Benign alveolar ridge keratosis (oral lichen simplex chronicus): a distinct clinicopathologic entity. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008, 58: 151-157. 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.07.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Warnakulasuriya S, Johnson NW, van der Waal I: Nomenclature and classification of potentially malignant disorders of the oral mucosa. J Oral Pathol Med. 2007, 36: 575-580. 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2007.00582.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Amagasa T, Yamashiro M, Uzawa N: Oral premalignant lesions: from a clinical perspective. Int J Clin Oncol. 2011, 16: 5-14. 10.1007/s10147-010-0157-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Greer RO, Meyers A, Said SM, Shroyer KR: Is p16INK4a protein expression in oral ST lesions a reliable precancerous marker?. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008, 37: 840-846. 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.05.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mignogna MD, Fortuna G, Leuci S, Adamo D, Siano M, Makary C, Cafiero C: Frictional keratoses on the facial attached gingival are rare clinical findings and do not belong to the category of leukoplakia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011, 69: 1367-1374. 10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.087.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Taybos G: Oral changes associated with tobacco use. Am J Med Sci. 2003, 326: 179-182. 10.1097/00000441-200310000-00005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JE: Oral and maxillofacial pathology. 1995, Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 228-229.Google Scholar
  11. Baykul T, Yilmaz HH, Aydin U, Aydin MA, Aksoy M, Yildirim D: Early diagnosis of oral cancer. J Int Med Res. 2010, 38: 737-749.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. McCullough MJ, Prasad G, Farah CS: Oral mucosal malignancy and potentially malignant lesions: an update on the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis and management. Aust Dent J. 2010, 55 (Suppl 1): 61-65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kademani D, Bell RB, Bagheri S, Holmgren E, Dierks E, Potter B, Homer L: Prognostic factors in intraoral squamous cell carcinoma: the influence of histologic grade. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005, 63: 1599-1605. 10.1016/j.joms.2005.07.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Bellato et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.