- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A concept to transfer a therapeutic splint position into permanent occlusion with a customized lingual appliance
© Sachse et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 5 March 2012
Accepted: 2 May 2012
Published: 21 May 2012
The role of occlusion concerning temporomandibular disorder is still unclear but seems to be the only component of the stomathognathic system dentists are able to change morphologically. The aim of the paper is to describe the orthodontist’s approach for transferring and maintaining a therapeutic splint position into permanent occlusion using a fully customized lingual appliance.
Fixed acrylic bite planes on lower molars were used to maintain a symptom-free condyle position prior to orthodontic treatment. Silicone impressions of the arches including the fixed bite planes were used for the Incognito laboratory procedure. Two digital setups were made. One setup represents the target occlusion. A second setup including the bite planes was used to fabricate an additional set of lower molar brackets. In the leveling stage all teeth except the lower molars were settled to maintain the therapeutic condyle position. Finally, the fixed bite planes were stepwise removed and molar brackets were replaced to establish the permanent occlusion planned with the first setup.
Results and discussion
The advantage of an individual lingual appliance consists in the high level of congruence between the fabricated setups and the final clinical result. Both the individual scope for design and the precision of the appliance were vitally important in the treatment of a patient with a functional disorder of the masticatory system.
Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is a widespread and common disease and therefore also an economic problem for the health care system. The prevalence of pain associated with muscles of the temporomandibular region is about 10% and 11.4% of the population suffer from a disc displacement with reduction . Women are more likely to suffer from TMD than men .
The clinical signs and symptoms of TMD are heterogenous. Most patients report of pain in the muscles of the stomathognathic system (i.e. myalgia) or pain or dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint (i.e. arthralgia, arthritis, disc displacement with/without reduction). Additionally other factors, like trauma, psychological or orthopedic disturbances can affect TMD .
The modern aetiological concept of TMD is mainly based on research by Dworkin and LeResche in the 1990s. Their research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD) considers somatic as well as psychological and social co-factors. The first axis includes a clinical examination that focuses on the muscles of the temporomandibular region and the status of the temporo-mandibular joint (pain/dysfunction). The second axis mainly focuses on the patient’s history including a graded chronic pain status, a jaw disability checklist, tools to evaluate the patient’s depression and non-specific physical symptoms and a checklist to gain detailed demographic information .
Today the RDC/TMD are commonly used by clinicians and investigators over the world since there are many translations available such as the German version .
Although occlusion remains unconsidered in the RDC/TMD instrument, dentists traditionally focus on it as a major aetiological factor. In addition, occlusion seems to be the only component of the stomathognathic system they are able to change structurally and morphologically.
As the role of occlusion is still unclear , the clinician should be careful in changing the patient’s occlusion irreversibly from the beginning. A temporary and reversible improvement towards a well-balanced static and dynamic occlusion should be the first step, which is mostly realized by a customized acrylic splint fabricated after registration of the centric condylar position (CCP). The patient is instructed to wear the splint several hours in the daytime and the whole night. In many cases this treatment leads to a relief of pain and an improvement in joint function .
This first therapeutic step might then be followed by other, more invasive and irreversible procedures such as prothodontics or orthodontics. These therapeutic options apply especially to patients who require prosthodontic or orthodontic intervention a priori. The sticking point of these interventions following splint therapy is precisely transferring and therefore maintaining the CCP.
The following article describes the orthodontist’s approach for transferring and maintaining a therapeutic condyle position into permanent occlusion using the Incognito-System (3M Unitek, Monrovia, USA).
Materials and methods
A 24-year-old female patient was referred to the Hannover Medical School for orthodontic treatment after successful splint therapy. Her symptoms prior to treatment comprised pain during mastication in the left TMJ. A painful capsulitis with a backward and upward condyle displacement in maximal intercuspidation was diagnosed. The patient’s individual loading vector was determined dorso-cranially, and ventro-caudal positioning of the mandible was achieved by means of a removable positioning splint.
The first step of the treatment plan was to maintain the new therapeutic position with fixed acrylic bite planes on the lower molars. If the patient remains symptom-free an orthodontic treatment is possible. The occlusion in the new therapeutic condyle position could be seen as the initial malocclusion for the following fixed appliance treatment.
The aim of orthodontic treatment in this case is to stabilize the therapeutic position of the mandible - and consequently both joints – by establishing a defined occlusal relation. Treatment is conducted using the fully customized lingual appliance as described by Wiechmann [8, 9]. This appliance will serve to transfer the splint-borne position to a defined occlusal relation.
Fabrication and fitting of the fixed acrylic splints
Acrylic bite planes for the lower first and second molars are fabricated on plaster models mounted in a semi-adjustable articulator using a face bow and centric registration.
The occlusal surfaces of the lower first and second molars were cleaned and sand blasted using aluminium oxide particles of 50 μm diameter. The DRY-Field-System (NOLA, Greatlakes Orthodontics, Ltd, Tonawanda, New York, USA) is inserted, and the occlusal surfaces are etched by applying 37% phosphoric acid gel for 20 seconds. The acid gel is then rinsed off thoroughly and the occlusal surfaces are dried. The adhesion surfaces of the splints are sand blasted and coated with plastic conditioner. Light or dual curing resin, e.g. Nexus NX3 dual cure (Kerr, Inc, Orange, CA, USA), serves to attach the acrylic material to the tooth surfaces (Figure 2).
Maintaining the therapeutic tmj position with the fully customized lingual appliance
After sonic scaling and air flow cleaning of the teeth, addition cure silicone impressions are made. These provide the foundation of the subsequent dental laboratory procedure.
In addition, a mandibular plaster cast representing the situation before insertion of the bite planes is required. For this purpose, an alginate impression provides a sufficient level of accuracy, and an appropriate plaster cast can already be fabricated in the course of the construction of the bite planes.
Maxillary and mandibular corrective copings as well as the mandibular plaster cast and a laboratory form are sent to 3M - Top Service GmbH, Bad Essen for further processing.
Orthodontic treatment with the a fully customized lingual appliance
The treatment was chosen according to the patient’s needs. No part of the therapy was conducted solely for the sake of research. Therefore, no ethical approval was sought.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and any accompanying images.
In orthodontics, fixed and removable appliances are used, and both of these groups feature advantages and shortcomings. Equally, removable splints and fixed bite planes exhibit different properties, some of which constitute advantages in favor of fixed treatment.
Fixed bite planes are permanently effective as they do not need to rely on patient compliance. They also permit for a more accurate adjustment of the vertical dimension, thus providing the means for an ideal preparation of the intended reconstruction. However, being fixed, they are more difficult to modify or repair. Patients wearing fixed bite planes are required to take regular appointments. Three months of treatment time may be enough to establish irreversible changes in tooth positions such as intrusion or extrusion.
The shift from a removable splint to fixed bite planes did not entail the re-occurrence of symptoms. The patient remained pain free during the following two year phase of orthodontic treatment. The post-treatment functional status provided no evidence of any remaining structural lesions, loading vectors or restriction vectors.
The advantage of an individual lingual appliance consists in the high level of congruence between the initially fabricated setup and the final clinical result . Both the individual scope for design and the precision of the appliance were vitally important in the treatment of a patient with a functional disorder of the masticatory system. After the removable splint had been replaced with fixed bite planes it was necessary to maintain the mandibular position and, consequently, the centric condyle position during the second phase of treatment. The fabrication of different set ups as well as the preparation of two different sets of brackets for the lower molars with slots at different levels permitted for a purposeful movement of the remaining teeth.
The transfer of a therapeutic splint position to centric occlusion may be performed accurately by means of the individual lingual fully customized lingual appliance. The presented therapeutic options and results indicate the Incognito-Appliance to be a useful therapeutic option.
We thank Dr. Claudius Middelberg for his useful comments concerning the TMD therapy. We also thank Dr. Jens Reimann for reviewing the English version of this article.
- Manfredini D, Guarda-Nardini L, Winocur E, Piccotti F, Ahlberg J, Lobbezoo F: Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of axis I epidemiologic findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011, 112: 453-62. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.04.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- LeResche L: Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders: implications for the investigation of etiologic factors. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med: an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists. 1997, 8: 291-305. 10.1177/10454411970080030401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ahlers MO, Freesmeyer WM, Fussnegger MR, Götz G, Jakstat HA, Koeck B, Neff A, Ottl P, Reiber T: Zur Therapie der funktionellen Erkrankungen des kraniomandibulären Systems. Wissenschaftliche Stellungnahme der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Funktionsdiagnostik und -therapie. 2005Google Scholar
- Dworkin SF, LeResche L: Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandibular Disorders: Facial and Oral Pain. 1992, 6: 301-55.Google Scholar
- John MT, Hirsch C, Reiber T, Dworkin SF: Translating the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders into German: evaluation of content and process. J Orofacial Pain. 2006, 20: 43-52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Boever JA, Carlsson GE, Klineberg IJ: Need for occlusal therapy and prosthodontic treatment in the management of temporomandibular disorders. Part I. Occlusal interferences and occlusal adjustment. J Oral Rehabil. 2000, 27: 367-79. 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00574.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yatani H, Minakuchi H, Matsuka Y, Fujisawa T, Yamashita A: The long-term effect of occlusal therapy on self-administered treatment outcomes of TMD. J Orofacial Pain. 1998, 12: 75-88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wiechmann D: A new bracket system for lingual orthodontic treatment. Part 1: Theoretical background and development. J Orofacial Orthopedics. 2002, 63: 234-45. 10.1007/s00056-002-0211-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wiechmann D: A new bracket system for lingual orthodontic treatment. Part 2: First clinical experiences and further development. J Orofacial Orthopedics. 2003, 64: 372-88. 10.1007/s00056-003-0325-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thalheim A: Schwestka-Polly R: Klinische Umsetzbarkeit eines Set-ups in der lingualen Orthodontie. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop . 2003, 64: 372-88.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.