This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Panorametry: suggestion of a method for mandibular measurements on panoramic radiographs
 Edela Puricelli^{1}Email author
https://doi.org/10.1186/1746160X519
© Puricelli; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 9 March 2009
Accepted: 23 October 2009
Published: 23 October 2009
Abstract
Background
Orthopantomography (panoramic radiography) has been used for the study of measurements involving particularly the prediction of the eruption of impacted lower third molars and analyses of measurements of the ramus and head of mandible. The discrepancies involved with the projection of this radiographic image has stimulated the search for further ways to use it, particularly in orthodontic treatments and oral and maxillofacial surgeries. The author proposes a graphimetric method for the mandible, based on panoramic radiography. The results are expressed in linear and angular measurements, aiming at bilateral comparisons as well as the determination of the proportion of skeletal and dental structures, individually and among themselves as a whole. The method has been named Panorametry, and allows measurement of the mandible (Mandibular Panorametry) or the posterior mandibular teeth (Dental Panorametry). When combining mandible and maxilla, it should be referred to as Total Panorametry. It may also be used, in the future, with Cone Beam computed tomography (CT) images, and in this case it may be mentioned as CT Panorametry.
Keywords
Background
Panoramic radiography (orthopantomography), which technically results from collecting images with a rotating system, allows wide view of the oral maxillofacial complex, in occlusion as well as in frontal overbite. In Orthodontics and in Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, panoramic Xray remains an important source of information. Even presenting very little image superposition, particularly for the mandible, it is not employed in comparative studies such as frontal and lateral cephalometries. As a frontolateral panoramic image of the face, it results in some distortion which involves, in decreasing degree of importance, horizontal, vertical and angular projections, respectively.
Correction of this distortion, considered the main limitation of panoramic radiography or orthopantomography, has been subject to much research since the first suggestions of technical use of the method were made. A great number of studies have explored this topic [1–11].
Graphimetric methods have been proposed by different authors in studies involving dry skulls, mandible, dental models and patients [1, 3, 4, 8, 12–25]. The distortions resulting from this type of radiograph cannot, presently, be eliminated or minimized by any type of equipment or technique. They remain, however, within acceptable proportionality, particularly for the mandible. The comparison of measurements in dental models and in panoramic Xray, for instance, has been providing information for the establishment of methods for comparative proportion studies [3, 5, 6]. Based on an earlier proposal (Puricelli, 2004) [23], the author presents a graphic tracing method for the mandible, base on panoramic radiography, allowing the comparison of proportions between skeletal and dental structures, individually and as a whole. The method can also provide bilateral information, as well as establish bilateral comparison. It has been named Panorametry, and presents the possibility to measure the mandible (Mandibular Panorametry) and the posterior mandibular teeth (Dental Mandibular Panorametry). The designation Total Panorametry might be reserved for the combined analysis of mandible and maxilla. When used with computed tomography images, such as in conebean computed tomography, it should be mentioned as CT Panorametry.
Methods
A viewbox, acetate matte tracing paper (0.003 inches thick, 8 × 10 inches), a compass with black lead and lead pencils in different colors, such as red, blue, yellow and green, are recommended for the task of graphic tracing. A 30cm ruler and straightedge should also be available.
Start by placing the radiography on the viewbox. Next, place the matte acetate film over the Rx and tape it securely. Records for each graphimetric study should be identified with name, gender and date of birth of the patient, date the radiography was taken, date the study was performed, name of the professional responsible for it, reasons for which the examination is indicated, etc.
Skeletal tracing

Structural Drawing of the Mandible

Horizontal Reference Plane (HRP) (cartesian)

Vertical Reference Plane (VRP) (cartesian)

Bisector of Horizontal and Vertical Reference Planes  Line 1 (cartesian)

Bisector Point (BP)

Condylar Point (CP)

Horizontal Line (rCPlCP)

Median Line of the Mandible (ML)

Condilar Medial Line (CML)

Dental Median Line (DML)

Mental Foramen (MF)

Line 2 (CPMF)

Median Point on the Gonial Area (MPGo)

Line 3 (MFMPGo)

Line 4 (MPGoCP)

Ramus/Body Triangle I (RBT I)

Tangents (T1T2)

Gonial Angle (GoA)

Gonial Point (GoP)

Ramus/Body Triangle II (RBT II)

Ramus/Body Triangle III (RBT III)

Ramus/Body Triangle IV (RBT IV)

Ramus/Body Triangle V (RBT V)
Dental tracing

Structural Drawing of Inferior Molar Teeth

Fixing of the Most External Points on the tooth crown Equator; and

Tracing of the Long Axis of each tooth crown structure.

Angle α: formed by the intersection of the long axis of the first and second mandibular molar crowns.

Angle β: formed by the intersection of the long axis of the first and third mandibular molar crowns.

Angle γ: formed by the intersection of the long axis of the second and third mandibular molar crowns.
To better represent and visualize the progressive tracing process, a suggestion for panorametry with colors is presented below. The multichromatic practical study of this graphimetry is individual.
The most external and posterior point of the right condyle outline is determined. A line angled at 90° with the HRP, tangent to the condyle and contacting this point, is drawn with the straightedge, and the Vertical Reference Plane (VRP), is thus obtained (black) (Figure 1). A bisector, from the intersection of HRP and VRP, is drawn with help of the compass. The resulting line, right line one (rL1), projects over the ramus and part of the mandibular body. The intersection between rL1 and the anatomical outline of the condyle is the right condyle point (rCP), and in the apex of the angle represents the bisector point (rBP) (dashed black line). Cartesian lines are thus obtained, as the geometrical principle of this study (Figure 1).
The Geometric Median Line (ML) results from drawing the HRP mediatrix from rBP and lBP (continuous green line), which can be more accurately done with use of a compass. A Condilar Median Line (CML) may be traced from rCPlCP over the same referential horizontal plane or over the Horizontal Line (rCplCp). More metrical data can thus be produced (dashed green line). The Dental Median Line (DML), perpendicular to the Horizontal Reference Plane (HRP), is obtained from the inferior central interincisive point (countinuous black line) (Figure 1).
From rL2, the Median Point of the Gonial Area (rMPGo) is drawn on the gonial region. Positioning the sharp point of the compass on the rMF central point, an intersection over rL2 is marked. The process is repeated from the rCP. The compass should be opened more widely than half the length of this line, for both drawings. The two intersections define the rL2 mediatrix. Its lower extension originates a new rMPGo on the external outline of the mandibular angle region. In this case, only the intersection point on the mandibular border should be marked (red) (Figure 2).
Another right Ramus/Body Triangle (rRBT II) can be drawn by connecting the points rCPrMFrGoPrCP, allowing for the same angular and linear measurements described for rRBT I, which may be traced in green. The rRBT II is thus formed by lines L2 (red), L5 and L6 (green) (Figure 4). A third triangle rRBT III may then originate from linking tangents 1 and 2 (blue) with the right line 1 (rL1), representing a new opportunity for measurement. Its limits extrapolate the mandibular tracing (Figure 4). Similarly, the intersection of lines ML with HPR (dotted blue lines) and rL1 (dotted black line) results in a right triangle rRBT IV (Figure 4).
Results
This graphimetric study proposes linear (vertical and horizontal) and angular measurements of mandibular and dental structures, individually, as a whole and bilaterally, in the same radiography. It may also allow other studies, such as comparative longitudinal measurements. The rBP and lBP points are considered as zero degrees (0°). The intersection between ML and the inferior border of the chin determines 90° for both the right and the left sides. For CML and DML, the same angular gradation is applied. The projections of the long crown axis (AX) on the HRP or this plane (rClC) on the Horizontal Line (HL) are scored from 0 to 90 (degrees). The lines may go beyond ML, CML and DML, particularly in case of acute angles of the third molar, and their transfer to a parallel line (Figure 8, tooth 38 arrows) may then allow measurement. On the other hand, the angles of the different intersections (AX) can be progressively measured on the lines that follow (L1, L2, L3 and L5 and T2). In this case, they may also be measured from 0 degree in each side, right or left, and may reach up to 180 degrees (Figure 7).
For linear measurement of rT1, its intersection with the Horizontal Reference Plane and with rT2 are considered as the farthest borders. The second tangent line, rT2, is distally limited by the rT1 intersection, whereas its mesial border lies at the intersection with ML extension (Figure 4). In case of interest on the metric relationship with CML or DML the procedure is repeated.
The linear measurements related to ML, CML and DML should proceed from a right angle with the geometric referential, the median lines in this case. Internal and external angles contained in the different triangles are evaluated according to trigonometric patterns. All sides of each triangle, medians and bisectors may also be measured and recorded for statistical and comparative studies. The Aα, Aβ and Aγ angles allow a well focused study of crown angulation among themselves.
Bone transversal linear dimensions.
Tracing  Length (mm) 

rBPlBP  
rCPlCP  
rMFlMF  
rMPGolMPGo  
rGOPlGOP 
Bone unilateral linear dimensions.
Tracing*  Length (mm) 

rBPML  
rBPCML  
rBPDML  
rCPML  
rCP  CML  
rCPDML  
rMPGoML  
rMP CMP  
rMPGoDML  
rGoP  ML  
rGoPCML  
rGoP DML  
rMFML  
rMFCML  
rMFDML 
Bone linear dimensions.
Tracing  Length (mm) 

rCPrMF = L2  
rMFrMPGo = L3  
rMPGorCP = L4  
rMFrGoP = L5  
rGoPrCP = L6  
rT 1  
rT 2  
rL1ML (r CP ML)  
rL1CML(r CP CML)  
rL1DML (r CP DML) 
Bone angular dimensions.
Angle  Degrees 

lBPrBPrMPGo  
lBPrBPrGoP  
lBPrBPrMF  
lCPrCPrMPGo  
lCPrCPrGOP  
lCPrCPrMF  
rT 1 rT 2  
rL1ML  
rL1CML 
Angular ramus/body triangular dimensions.
Angle  Degrees 

rL2rL3  
rL3rL4  
rL2rL4  
rL2rL5  
rL5rL6  
rL2rL6  
rT 1rT 2  
rT 1  rL1  
rT 2rL1  
rL1ML  
MLrBp (HPR)  
MLrBPL1 
Intercoronary linear dimensions.
Tracing  Values (mm)  Tracing  Values (mm) 

M46rMPGo  M36lMPGo  
M46rGoP  M36lGoP  
M46D48  M36D38  
M46D47  M36D37  
M46ML (90°)  M36ML (90°)  
M46CML (90°) M46DML(90)  M36CML (90°) M36DML(90) 
Dentomandibular angular dimensions.
Angle  Degrees 

46AXrBP/lBP (HRP)  
46 AX rCPl CP (HL)  
46AXrL1  
46AXrL2  
46AXrL3  
46AXrL5  
46AXrT 2 
Interdental angular dimensions.
Angle  Degrees  Angle  Degrees 

Aα 4647  Aα 3637  
Aβ 4648  Aβ 3638  
Aγ 4748  Aγ 3738 
Discussion
Skull lateral teleradiographs are widely accepted for cephalometric studies, due to the amount of information about measurement of dental and craniofacial complexes they provide. However, the overlaying of anatomical structures makes the identification of marker points more difficult and prevents comparisons between the left and right sides [4, 14]. The comparison of cephalometric and craniometric measurement in lateral teleradiographs has shown that the method has little reliability in the evaluation of the gonial angle, with a distortion which is in average larger for the gonial angle closer to the film [5]. Even allowing for laterolateral studies, posteroanterior face images in cephalostat present marker anatomical points of difficult definition.
The method of panorametry proposed here allows the recognition, from horizontal and vertical reference planes, of a skeletal and a dental median lines, in a mandible analyzed independent of the rigid structures of the facial skeleton [23]. Contrary to the proposal made by Larheim and Svanaes (1986) [8], in our experience some asymmetry may exist between the skeletal structure and the dental arch without necessary classification of the Median Line (ML) as only one. The possibility to determine a Condilar Median Line (CML), established from the distance between right and left Condylar Points (rCPlCP), may also be used for these measurements. Determination of the Median Line from rBPlBP follows, therefore, the Cartesian principle that from three coordinates  reference horizontal and vertical planes and their bisector  the mandibular structure can be viewed spatially. The Dental Median Line (DML), however, is directly related to the symmetry of the lower dental arch. These median lines may occasionally superimpose, which could indicate a better relation of the bonedental symmetry.
The Mental Foramen (MF) stands out as an anatomical point, but may be difficult to locate due to lack of uniformity of its border. It may be delineated, however, by observation of the path of the nervous conduct between the premolar apices, under adequate light.
The Median Point of the Gonial Area (MPGo) in our methodological proposal starts at line L2(r/l), and is not meant to be defined as the angle referred to in former studies. It is geometrically determined, and is part of the triangular figure formed from points (r/l)CP  (r/l)MF  (r/l)MPGo or (r/l)L2  (r/l)L3  (r/l)L4.
The presence of lines tangent to mandibular ramus (T1) and body (T2) reproduces the proposal by Mattila et al. (1977) [4] for determination of the gonial angle in orthopantomograms. Subsequent studies showed that the gonial angle is more accurate, more stable and presents less distortions, even with variation in the position of the patient head [4, 7–11]. In our experience, the bisector of the intersection of the tangent lines allows the determination of the Gonion Point (GoP), as a further referential information to investigate.
Determination of the Gonion Point (GoP)allows the outline of a further triangle, also called Ramus/Body Triangle II, using points (r/l)CP  (r/l)MF  (r/l)GoP). This triangle, as with RBT I, is also contained within the limits of the mandibular area. The RBT III triangle [(r/l)T1  (r/l)T2  (r/l)L1] can associate external and internal metrics of the mandibular body and ramus.. Intersection of line (r/l)MLL1 and the Horizontal Reference Plane originates a right triangle, which creates through its bisector a new Cartesian reference near the mandibular gonial region. New triangles are thus determined, from preexisting and well established points. Presenting its own angular and linear dimensions, this triangle allows unilateral and bilateral comparison to be performed, in longitudinal studies as well. This ample graphimetric view show the mandibular ramus and body still in triangular shape, allowing for surface studies. We may suggest that, based on the presente proposal in which the cartesian tracing evolves from the condyles, the tracing for Condylar Morphology Scale (CMS) and ramus height analysis mentioned by Borstlap et al. (2004) [22], and the asymmetry indices according to Habets et al (1988) [15] and Kjellberg et al. (1994) [17], are reintroduced for new studies.
Using panoramic radiography, among other measurements it is possible to observe molar spaces in the same film and associate the eruptive process of third molars with other dentofacial structures [1–3, 6, 13, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 23–25].
Horizontal measurements are considered less accurate [8, 9]. Linear intercrown measurements proposed in the present work allow the observation of possible combinations of the first molar with the second and third molars, and of these two among themselves, uni or bilaterally. It also allows extension of measurements for ML, CML and DML in a 90 degree relationship Welander et al. (1989) [9] suggested that the anterior mandibular area is more susceptible to distortions. The present study suggests a more reliable method, based on the establishment of a geometric relationship of ML, CML and DML in right angle with the Horizontal Reference Plane, where lines rBP/lBP and rCP/lCP may also be used.
Angular measurements of the teeth performed with panoramic radiography are more reliable, when compared to other radiographic methods [3, 10, 12, 13]. Angular distortions and variability are more frequently concentrated in the premolar region and canines of both arches, whereas the molar region and the inferior borders of the mandibular body and posterior border of the ramus are relatively stable. Measurement of the gonial angle was also remarkably reproducible, even with largely different types of head positioning. Angular measurements resulting from panoramic radiographs are thus perfectly adequate for quantitative studies, particularly of the development of posterior dental regions and of inferior third molars [7].
In studies reported by Altonen et al. (1977) [12] and Hattab et al. (1999) [20], the longitudinal axes of these teeth were drawn through the midpoint of the occlusal surface and bifurcation or the midpoint of the bone concentration forming this bifurcation. Catella et al. (1998) [19], on the other hand, projected the long axis of the teeth by a line bisecting the midpoints between the mesial and distal height of contours and the cementoenamel junction. If the cementoenamel junction had not already formed, the long axis was determined by a line perpendicular to the line connecting the mesial and distal heights of contour on the developing crown. In the search for a more geometrical form, of better visual and graphic identification, we propose drawing the long axis of the tooth based on the crown structure. This design, however, allows the drawing of images with deviations between the root and the crown of the same tooth, so that the correct long axis proposed is not adequately followed. Precision in the dental outlines, as provided by different methods, is one of most important factors contributing for reliability and reproducibility of graphimetric results.
We do not propose a comparison of the β angle introduced by Altonen et al. (1977) [12] with the γ angle presented here, since they are obtained with different approaches. Our concern with increasing the options of angular measurements is based on the results of Frykholm et al. (1977) [3]. The reliability of panoramic radiography in providing angular measurements of adjacent teeth was evaluated, and the authors concluded that this is the most adequate radiographic method for the analysis of dental angulation. The studies by Zach et al. (1969) [1] have also prompted us to explore the possibility of using this type of radiographic image for longitudinal investigations, following for instance the growth of a child and predicting any possible impaction due to due to lack of space.
In our first methodological proposal (Puricelli, 2004) [23], graphimetric data were enhanced, including linear and angular measurements for comparative studies of mandibular and dental structures. New graphic inclusions and metric proposals are introduced in the present work.
Conclusion
Considering that currently there is a lack of methodological approaches to explore results from panoramic radiography, this work proposes a standardizing method for the establishment and performance of skeletal and dental measurements of the mandible.
The reference points suggested are predominantly located in the region between the molars and mandibular ramus, for which image distortions are known to be smaller. The suggested tracing method meets the needs of skeletal and dental measurements, uni and/or bilaterally. Measurement of triangular surfaces may be explored in a future study. The apparent excess of information generated intends to allow maximal levels of comparison, indicating the measurements more suitable and reliable for each situation, without the intention to exhaust all possibilities. Statistical studies with high degree of confidence will certainly allow the indication of the most recommended measurements. Currently, this proposal is not limited to radiographs but contemplates also the possibility to study panoramic CT images, particularly those obtained with Cone Beam CT.
Abbreviations
Skeletal abbreviations
 (preceded by r or l:

for right or left sides)
 BP:

Bisector Point
 C:

condyle
 CML:

Condilar Median Line
 CP:

Condylar Point
 DML:

Dental Median Line
 GoA:

Gonial Angle
 GoP:

Gonion Point
 HL:

Horizontal Line
 HRP:

Horizontal Reference Plane
 L1 to L6:

lines 1 to 6
 MF:

Mental Foramen
 ML:

Median Line of the Mandible
 MPGo:

median point of the Gonial Area
 RBT I:

Ramus/Body Triangle I
 RBT II:

Ramus/Body Triangle II
 RBT III:

Ramus/Body Triangle III
 RBT IV:

Ramus/Body Triangle IV
 RBT V:

Ramus/Body Triangle V
 T:

Tangents
 VRP:

Vertical Reference Plane.
Dental abbreviations
 A α:

alpha angle
 A β:

beta angle
 A γ:

gamma angle
 AX:

Long Crown Axis
Declarations
Acknowledgements
The author is indebted to Adriana Corsetti, Mário Alexandre Morganti and Isabel Pucci.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
 Zach GA, Langland OE, Sippy FH: The use of the orthopantomograph in longitudinal studies. Angle Orthod. 1969, 39: 4250.PubMedGoogle Scholar
 McIver FT, Brogan DR, Lyman GE: Effect of head positioning upon the width of mandibular tooth images on panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973, 35: 698707. 10.1016/00304220(73)900388.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Frykholm A, Malmgreen O, Sämfors KA, Welander U: Angular measurements in orthopantomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1977, 6: 7781.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Matilla K, Altonen M, Haavikko K: Determination of the gonial angle from the orthopantomogram. Angle Orthod. 1977, 47: 107110.Google Scholar
 Slagsvold O, Pedersen K: Gonial angle distortion in lateral head films: a methodologic study. Am J Orthod. 1977, 71: 554564. 10.1016/00029416(77)900057.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Rejebian GP: A statistical correlation of individual tooth size distortions on the orthopantomographic radiograph. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1979, 75: 525534.Google Scholar
 Samawi SS, Burke PH: Angular distortion in the orthopantomogram. Br J Orthod. 1984, 11: 100107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Larheim TA, Svanaes DB: Reproductibility of rotational panoramic radiography: mandibular linear dimensions an angles. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1986, 90: 4551. 10.1016/08895406(86)900260.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Welander U, Tronge G, McDavid D: An analysis of different planes within the image rayer in rotational panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1987, 16: 7984.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Mckee IA, Glover KE, Willianson PC, Lam EW, Heo G, Major PW: The effect of vertical and horizontal head positioning in panoramic radiography on mesiodistal tooth angulations. Angle Orthod. 2001, 71: 442451.PubMedGoogle Scholar
 Laster WS, Ludlow JB, Bailey LJ, Hershey HG: Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy and prediction of asymmetry in panoramic radiographic images. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2005, 34: 343349. 10.1259/dmfr/28020783.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Altonen M, Haavikko K, Matilla K: Developmental position of lower third molar in relation to gonial a Angle and lower second molar. Angle Orthod. 1977, 47: 249255.PubMedGoogle Scholar
 Haavikko K, Altonen M, Mattila K: Prediction angulation development and eruption of the third molar. Angle Orthod. 1978, 48: 3948.PubMedGoogle Scholar
 Olive R, Basford K: Reability and validity of lower third molar space assessment techniques. Am J Orthod. 1981, 79: 4553. 10.1016/00029416(81)901007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Habets LL, Bezuur JN, Neiji M, Hansson TL: The Orthopantomogram, an aid in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint problems II The vertical symmetry. J Oral Rehabil. 1988, 15: 465471. 10.1111/j.13652842.1988.tb00182.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Ganss C, Hchban W, Kielbassa A, Umstadt TH: Prognosis of third molar eruption. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993, 76: 688693. 10.1016/00304220(93)900353.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Kjellberg H: Condilar height on panoramic radiographs. A methodologic study with a clinical application. Acta Odontol Scand. 1994, 52: 4350. 10.3109/00016359409096375.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Ventä I, Murtomaa H, Ylipaavalniemi PA: Device to predict lower third molar eruption. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1997, 84: 598603.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Castella P, Albright RH Jr, Straja S, Tucay OC: Prediction of mandibular third molar impaction in the orthodontic patient from a panoramic radiograph. Clin Orthod Res . 1998, 1: 3743.PubMedGoogle Scholar
 Hattab FN, Alhaija ES: Radiographic evaluation of mandibular third molar eruption space. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1999, 88: 285291.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Ventä I, Turtola L, Ylipaavalniemi P: Radiographic followup of impacted third molars from age 20 to 32 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001, 30: 5457. 10.1054/ijom.2000.0002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Borstlap WA, Stoelinga PJ, Hoppenreijs TJ, van't Hof MA: Stabilisation of sagittal split advancement osteotomies with miniplates: aprospective, multicentre study with twoyear followup. Part I. Clinical parameters. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004, 33: 433441. 10.1016/j.ijom.2004.02.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Puricelli E: Proposta de metodologia para traçado do maxilar inferior em radiografia panorâmica: panorametria. Ortod Gaúcha. 2004, 8: 410.Google Scholar
 Akcam MO, Altiok T, Ozdiler E: Panoramic radiographs: a tool for investigating skeletal pattern. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006, 123: 175181. 10.1067/mod.2003.3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Niedzielzska IA, Drugacz J, Kus N, Kreska J: Panoramic radiographic predictors of mandibular third molar eruption. Oral Surg Oral Med OralPathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006, 102: 154159. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.