- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Oral acantholytic squamous cell carcinoma shares clinical and histological features with angiosarcoma
© Driemel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
- Received: 06 May 2008
- Accepted: 31 July 2008
- Published: 31 July 2008
acantholytic squamous cell carcinomas (ASCC) and intraoral angiosarcoma share similar histopathological features. Aim of this study was to find marker for a clear distinction.
Four oral acantholytic squamous cell carcinomas and one intraoral angiosarcoma are used to compare the eruptive intraoral growth-pattern, age-peak, unfavourable prognosis and slit-like intratumorous spaces in common histological staining as identical clinical and histopathological features. Immunohistochemical staining for pancytokeratin, cytokeratin, collagen type IV, γ2-chain of laminin-5, endothelial differentiation marker CD31 and CD34, F VIII-associated antigen, Ki 67-antigen, β-catenin, E-cadherin, α-smooth-muscle-actin and Fli-1 were done.
Cytokeratin-immunoreactive cells can be identified in both lesions. The large vascularization of ASCC complicates the interpretation of vascular differential markers being characteristic for angiosarcoma. Loss of cell-cell-adhesion, monitored by loss of E-cadherin and β-catenin membrane-staining, are indetified as reasons for massive expression of invasion-factor ln-5 in ASCC and considered responsible for unfavourable prognosis of ASCC. Expression of Fli-1 in angiosarcoma and cellular immunoreaction for ln-5 in ASCC are worked out as distinguishing features of both entities.
Fli-1 in angiosarcoma and ln-5 in ASCC are distinguishing features.
- Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Malignant Soft Tissue Tumour
- Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Both oral angiosarcoma and oral acantholytic squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) are well-defined entities. The WHO classification of tumours describes angiosarcoma as a malignant tumour consisting of cells recapitulating variably the morphological and functional features of normal endothelium, ICD-O code 9120/3 [1–3]. ASCC (synonyms: acantholytic squamous cell carcinoma, adenoid squamous carcinoma, pseudoglandular squamous cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma with glandlike (adenoid) features, angiosarcoma-like squamous cell carcinoma, adenoacanthoma, pseudovascular adenoid squamous cell carcinoma, pseudoangiosarcomatous carcinoma) is characterized as a squamous cell carcinoma containing pseudo-glandular spaces or lumina, ICD-O code 8075/3 [4, 5].
Although angiosarcoma (malignant soft tissue tumour) and ASCC present conceptually complete different tumour entities their histological features are similar and defined by intratumorous spaces. Interestingly both tumour entities show comparable clinical appearance in the oral cavity. The peak incidence of angiosarcoma is the 7th decade  and the peak incidence of the oral ASCC is the 6th decade . Macroscopically both entities express in oral cavity fast growing, eruptive lesions and have poor prognosis [8, 9]. Like all oral squamous cell carcinomas ASCC show male predilection of 1 to 3.5 whereas no sex predilection of oral angiosarcoma is known.
Common and different aspects of oral angiosarcoma and ASCC will be worked out for the correct differential diagnosis. The cellbiological background explaining the peculiar pseudovascular appearance of ASCC is elucidated.
A 63-year-old male patient presented with a polypous, superficial ulcerated, 1.5 × 1 × 1 cm3 large mass at the alveolar ridge. A biopsy was taken and the histological diagnosis of an angiosarcoma was established. Metastases developed in pleurae (cytologically verified) and ileum one month after diagnosis of the primary oral lesion. Although an ileum segment resection was carried out the patient died of angiosarcoma induced intestinal bleeding two months after initial diagnosis.
Clinical features of patients with acantholytic squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC).
right alveolar ridge of the
pT4 pN0 cM0 L1 V1
right border of the tongue
floor of the mouth
pT4a pN1 cM0 L1 V0
For comparative analysis the tissue of the diagnostic tumour biopsies was fixed in 4.0% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. The slides were stained with H&E, PAS, Goldner's trichrome staining and Gömöri.
Primary antibodies applied in the study: pancytokeratin (clones AE1/AE3, Dako, Denmark) dilution 1:20, cytokeratin (clone MNF-116, Dako, Denmark) dilution 1:200, collagen type IV (clone C22, Dako, Denmark) dilution 1:200, γ2-chain of laminin-5 (clone D4B5, Chemicon, USA) dilution 1:10000, endothelial differentiation marker CD31 (clone JC/70A, Dako, Denmark) dilution 1:100, CD34 (clone QBEND 10, Immunotech, France) dilution 1:500, F VIII-associated antigen (clone F 8/86, Dako, Denmark) dilution 1:200, Ki 67-antigen (clone MIB-1, Dako, Denmark) dilution 1:1000, β-catenin (clone 17 C 2, Novacastra, U.K.) 1:200, E-cadherin (clone 4A2C7, Zymed, USA) dilution 1:75, α-smooth-muscle-actin (clone 1A4, Dako, Denmark) dilution 1:400, Fli-1 (polyklonal, Zymed, USA). Primary antibodies were detected using the streptavidin-biotin-alkaline phosphatase-technique (ChemMate, Dako, Denmark). The immunohistochemical procedure was carried out at autostainer plus according to the manufactures' protocol (Dako, Denmark).
In the stroma of both entities as well as around the slit-like intratumorous spaces α-smooth-muscle-positive cells were diagnosed and often a distinction between stroma myofibroblasts or pericytes could not be made.
The proliferative activity did not discriminate angiosarcoma from ASCC. The Ki 67-index reached 20%.
E-cadherin and β-catenin were found in all four ASCCs but not in the angiosarcoma. In the majority of the tumour cells there was an E-cadherin immunostaining in cytoplasm and not at the cell membrane. Sometimes β-catenin was seen not only in the cytoplasm but also within the nucleus.
Several authors have already emphasized the histopathologic similarity of ASCC and angiosarcoma. [10–13]. Although the WHO defines ASCC as an original entity for a long time [4, 5], there are less than thirty cases of ASCCs documented in the international literature so far . Both entities may have an association to previous exposal to ionizing radiation [9, 14]. To determine differential diagnosis and to differentiate ASCC from angiosarcoma an immunohistochemical typing is required regularly, because the epidermoid differentiation may be extremely masked by pseudovascular proliferation. Dyskeratoses may represent a rare pattern in ASCC. The immunohistochemical analysis has to consider on the one side that in soft tissue tumour angiosarcoma cytokeratin-positive cells may appear and on the other side that the plentiful vessels in the tumour stroma of ASCC are signed by endoepithelial differential markers, so that the classic discriminating differential markers cytokeratin, factor VIII-associated antigen and others are often difficult to be interpreted. [15–17]. The Fli-1-protein, a member of the ETS family of DNA-binding transcription factors was recently highlighted as a new vascular differentiation marker [18, 19]. Although Fli-1 can be also rarely identified in carcinomas , ASCC is immunonegative for this marker, so that Fli-1 can be recommended to discriminate between Angiosarcoma and ASCC.
The incomplete border of pericytes represents an accepted feature for identifying differentiation disturbed neoplastic vessels of angiosarcoma. The pericytes are emphasized by α-smooth-muscle-actin . However the incomplete border of pericytes in structures of angiosarcoma is not suitable for discriminating angiosarcoma versus ASCC, because in ASCC α-smooth-muscle-stromamyofibroblasts may mimic the pattern of pericytes lining discontinuously the slit-like tumour-spaces.
Interestingly in angiosarcoma ln-5 positive basal membranes were recognised. Ln-5 is a characteristic protein of epithelial basal membranes that is regularly identified in oral mucosa and in oral squamous cell carinoma . It connects the basal membrane with the hemidesmosomes of epithelial cells and has not been described in mesenchymal basal membranes so far. Because in angiosarcoma in contrast to ASCC no cytoplasmatic marking as a sign of synthesis of ln-5-γ2-chain could be made out and because ln-5 was only identified in parts of angiosarcoma localized next to preexisting oral epithelia, it is suggested, that ln-5 of the new formed basal membranes of angiosarcoma comes from the neighbouring preexisting epithelial structures and has only been integrated into the new formed basal membranes of angiosarcoma.
The cytoplasmatic ln-5 detection of ASCC cells presents on the one hand a distinguishing feature between ASCC and angiosarcoma and on the other hand a tumour biological indicator of the unfavourable prognosis of ASCC.
An abundant detection of γ2-chain of ln-5 in carcinoma cells is correspondingly accepted in literature as an unfavourable prognostic pattern. The extracellular matrix protein stimulates invasion of carcinoma cells [22–24]. Hlubek and co-workers identified 2001 β-catenin as a transcription-factor of laminin-γ2-chain . The membrane-localized β-catenin-E-cadherin-complex mediates the cell-cell-adhesion, that is obviously disturbed in ASCC and that is responsible for forming of the typical intercellular spaces [13, 26, 27]. In case of a disturbed forming of β-catenin-E-cadherin-complex at the carcinoma cell membrane β-catenin liberated from cell membrane is able to migrate into the cell nucleus, to act as a transcription-factor and to induce an overexpression of invasion-factor laminin-γ2-chain in ASCC.
The reduced cell-cell-adhesion and the extremely increased expression of laminin-γ2-chain are suggested as cell biological reasons for the extreme early distant metastasising of ASCC during therapy.
In summary angiosarcoma and ASCC do not only share identical clinical features and a similar histopathological pattern in common histological staining but also show overlaps of cytokeratin-expression and of expression of vascular differential markers. Expression of Fli-1 in angiosarcoma and cytoplasmatic immunoreaction for γ2-chain of ln-5 in ASCC are worked out as distinguishing features of both entities.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
This study was supported by grants from the European Union FP6, LSHC-CT-2003-5032, STROMA, this publication reflects only the authors' view. The European Commission is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained.
- Thompson LDR, Fanburg-Smith JC: Malignant soft tissue tumours. Angiosarcoma. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Edited by: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D. 2005, IARC Press, Lyon, 40-41.Google Scholar
- Thompson LDR, Fanburg-Smith JC: Malignant soft tissue tumours. Angiosarcoma. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Edited by: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D. 2005, IARC Press, Lyon, 148-149.Google Scholar
- Weiss SW, Lasota J, Miettinen MM: Angiosarcoma of soft tissue. World Health Organization Classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of soft tissue and bone. Edited by: Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F. 2002, IARC Press, Lyon, 175-177.Google Scholar
- Cardesa A, Zidar N, Alos L: Acantholytic squamous cell carcinoma. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Edited by: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D. 2005, IARC Press, Lyon, 129-Google Scholar
- Pindborg JJ, Reichart PA, Smith CJ, van der Waal: Adenoid squamous cell carcinoma. WHO histological typing of cancer and precancer of the oral mucosa. Edited by: Pindborg JJ, Reichart PA, Smith CJ, van der Waal I. 1997, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 15-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meis-Kindblom JM, Kindblom LG: Angiosarcoma of soft tissue: a study of 80 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998, 22: 683-697. 10.1097/00000478-199806000-00005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Driemel O, Braxein K, Pistner H, Kosmehl H: Orales Adenoid-Squamöses Karzinom. Tumormarker und Prognose, Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2004, 8: 118-122. 10.1007/s10006-004-0532-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Batsakis JG, Huser J: Squamous carcinomas with glandlike (adenoid) features. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1990, 99: 87-88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cawson RA, Binnie WH, Speight PM, Barrett AW, Wright JM: Uncommon type of carcinoma. Lucas's pathology of tumors of the oral tissues. Edited by: Cawson RA, Binnie WH, Speight PM, Barrett AW, Wright JM. 1998, Churchill Livingstone, London, 241-248. 5Google Scholar
- Banerjee SS, Eyden BP, Wells S, McWilliam LJ, Harris M: Pseudoangiosarcomatous carcinoma: a clinicopathological study of seven cases. Histopathology. 1992, 21 (1): 13-23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horie Y, Kato M: Pseudovascular squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervical lesion that may simulate an angiosarcoma. Pathol Int. 1999, 49: 170-174. 10.1046/j.1440-1827.1999.00841.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nappi O, Swanson PE, Wick MR: Pseudovascular squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: clinicopathologic study of three cases and comparison with the pleuropulmonary angiosarcoma. Hum Pathol. 1994, 25: 373-378. 10.1016/0046-8177(94)90145-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zidar N, Gale N, Zupevc A, Dovsak D: Pseudovascular adenoid squamous-cell carcinoma of the oral cavity – a report of two cases. J Clin Pathol. 2006, 59: 1206-1208. 10.1136/jcp.2005.029553.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Grady AM, Krishnan V, Cohen L: Postirradiation angiosarcoma of the head and neck: report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002, 60: 828-831. 10.1053/joms.2002.33255.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Allison KH, Yoder BJ, Bronner MP, Goldblum JR, Rubin BP: Angiosarcoma involving the gastrointestinal tract: a series of primary and metastatic cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004, 28: 298-307. 10.1097/00000478-200403000-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gagner JP, Yim JH, Yang GC: Fine-needle aspiration cytology of epithelioid angiosarcoma: A diagnostic dilemma. Diagn Cytopathol. 2005, 33: 429-433. 10.1002/dc.20379.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hufnagel TJ, Kim JH, True LD, Mannelidis EE: Immunohistochemistry of capillary hemangioblastoma. Immuno-peroxidase-labeled antibody staining resolves the differential diagnosis with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, but does not explain the histogenesis of the capillary hemangioblastoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1989, 13: 207-216.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Billings SD, Folpe AL, Weiss SW: Epitheloid sarcoma-like hemangioendothelioma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003, 27: 48-57. 10.1097/00000478-200301000-00006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Folpe AL, Chand EM, Goldblum JR, Weiss SW: Expression of Fli-1, a nuclear transcription factor, distinguishes vascular neoplasms from potential mimics. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001, 25: 1061-1066. 10.1097/00000478-200108000-00011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rossi S, Orvieto E, Furlanetto A, Laurino L, Ninfo V, Dei Tos AP: Utility of the immunohistochemical detection of FLI-1 expression in round cell and vascular neoplasm using a monoclonal antibody. Mod Pathol. 2004, 17: 547-552. 10.1038/modpathol.3800065.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haas KM, Berndt A, Stiller KJ, Hyckel P, Kosmehl H: A comparative quantitative analysis of laminin-5 in the basement membrane of normal, hyperplastic, and malignant oral mucosa by confocal immunofluorescence imaging. J Histochem Cytochem. 2001, 49: 1261-1268.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kosmehl H, Berndt A, Strassburger S, Borsi L, Rouselle P, Mandel U, Hyckel P, Zardi L, Katenkamp D: Distribution of laminin and fibronectin isoforms in oral mucosa and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 1999, 81: 1071-1079. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690809.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Patel V, Aldridge K, Ensley JF, Odell E, Boyd A, Jones J, Gutkind J, Yeudall WA: Laminin-gamma2 overexpression in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2002, 99: 583-588. 10.1002/ijc.10403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pyke C, Roemer J, Kallunki P, Lund LR, Ralfkiaer E, Danoe K, Tryggvason K: The γ2 chain of kalinin/laminin-5 is preferentially expressed in invading malignant cells in human cancers. Am J Pathol. 1994, 145: 782-791.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hlubek F, Jung A, Kotzor N, Kirchner T, Brabletz T: Expression of the invasion factor laminin gamma2 in colorectal carcinomas is regulated by beta-catenin. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 8089-8093.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bankfalvi A, Krassort M, Buchwalow IB, Vegh A, Felszeghy E, Piffko J: Gains and losses of adhesion molecules (CD44, E-cadherin, a beta-catenin) during oral carcinogensis and tumour progression. J Pathol. 2002, 198: 343-351. 10.1002/path.1204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lo Muzio L, Staibano S, Pannone G, Grieco M, Mignogna MD, Certa A, Testa NF, De Rosa G: Beta- and gamma-catenin expression in oral squamous cell carcinomas. Anticancer Res. 1999, 19: 3817-3826.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.