This study was carried out to establish the relative incidence and provide clinico-pathologic information on the various histological types of ameloblastoma seen at the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital complex, Ile-Ife in order to provide a baseline data which will be of significance to the pathologist and clinician.
Methods
Clinico-pathologic data on a total of 77 histologically diagnosed cases of ameloblastoma archieved at the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital Complex, Ile-Ife over a 15 year period were obtained and analysed descriptively.
Results
Follicular ameloblastoma was the most common histological type (50 cases, 64.9%), followed by plexiform ameloblastoma (10 cases, 13.0%). 4 (5.2%) cases of desmoplastic and 3 (3.9%) cases of acanthomatous ameloblastoma were seen while the basal cell variant accounted for 2 (2.6%) cases. Only 1 case of the unicystic type was seen. Some of the 77 cases presented as a mixture of two or more histological types. Ameloblastoma occurred over an age range of 11 to 70 years with a peak age incidence in the 3rd decade.
Conclusion
This study provides a baseline data on variants of ameloblastoma as obtained in a suburban Nigerian population. Since variants of ameloblastoma differ in biologic behaviour, the data collected in this study provides clinicopathologic information which is of significance to the pathologist and clinician.
Background
Ameloblastoma is a neoplasm of odontogenic epithelium, especially of enamel organ-type tissue that has not undergone differentiation to the point of hard tissue formation [1]. It generally occurs in bone, and it has been postulated that the epithelium of origin is derived from one of the following sources: (1) cell rests of the enamel organ, (2) epithelium of odontogenic cysts, (3) disturbances of the developing enamel organ, (4) basal cells of the surface epithelium or (5) heterotropic epithelium in other parts of the body [2]. The theory of an odontogenic origin for the ameloblastoma is supported clinically by the tumour's common occurrence in the tooth bearing area and is further reinforced by the finding of Spouge that one in every three such tumours are mural proliferations in intimate association with the reduced anamel-forming epithelium of dentigerous cysts [3].
In the World Health Organisation (WHO) histological typing of odontogenic tumours [4], ameloblastoma was classified as belonging to the group of lesions in which there is odontogenic epithelium without morphorlically identifiable odontogenic ectomesenchyme. Recently there has been substantial changes in the section on ameloblastoma, some newly recorgnised odontogenic tumours have been added and some lesions previously designated have been moved to another part of the classification or merged into different subgroups.
Amongst the ameloblastomas, there is now more detailed reference to the unicystic variety because both the surgical management and prognosis of these lesions are significantly different from that of other ameloblastomas. Also of note are the desmoplastic ameloblastoma and the keratoameloblastoma. The squamous odontogenic tumour has become accepted as a distinctive lesion rather than a variant of ameloblastoma. Although it has an infiltrative pattern of growth, most cases respond to curettage, and recurrence is rare.
This study was carried out to establish the relative incidence and provide clinico-pathologic information on the various histological types of ameloblastoma seen at the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital complex, Ile-Ife over a 15 year period in order to provide a baseline data which will be of significance to the pathologist and clinician.
Materials and methods
Biopsy records of all histologically diagnosed cases of ameloblastoma during the period from 1990 to 2004 inclusive were retrieved from the files of the biopsy service of the Department of Morbid Anatomy and Forensic Medicine and that of Oral Pathology of the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital complex, Ile-Ife. 79 cases of ameloblastoma were extracted for detailed analysis. Haematoxylin and eosin stained sections of the ameloblastomas were retrieved and reviewed in order to reconfirm the diagnosis and where necessary, revise the diagnosis in light of available clinical and histological details and the WHO histological typing of odontogenic tumours[4]. After review, 77 of the 79 cases were confirmed as ameloblastomas and were categorised into different histological types based on the presenting histological features. Data on incidence, age, sex and site of lesions were analysed descriptively for the various variants of ameloblastoma.
Results
A total of 79 lesions of the oral cavity and jaws were diagnosed as ameloblastoma between January 1990 and December 2004. Of these, 77 cases satisfied the histological criteria for ameloblastoma, some of them being a mixture of two or more histological types. They were categorized into ten histological subtypes (Table 1). Follicular ameloblastoma was the most common histological type (50 cases, 64.9%), followed by plexiform ameloblastoma (10 cases, 13.0%) and desmoplastic ameloblastoma (4 cases, 5.2%). 3 (3.9%) cases of acanthomatous ameloblastoma were seen while the basal cell variant accounted for only 2 (2.6%) cases. Only 1 case (1.3%) of unicystic ameloblastoma was seen. Ameloblastoma occurred over an age range of 11 to 70 years (Table 1) with a peak age incidence in the 3rd decade.
Table 1
Histological type/Age group of patient cross-tabulation
Age group of patients (years)
Histological type
11–20
21–30
31–40
41–50
51–60
61–70
Total (%)
Follicular
11
22
11
4
1
1
50 (64.9)
Plexiform
2
3
1
0
2
2
10 (13.0)
Acanthomatous
0
0
0
0
1
2
3 (3.9)
Basal cell
0
0
2
0
0
0
2 (2.6)
Desmoplastic
0
1
3
0
0
0
4 (5.2)
Unicystic
0
0
1
0
0
0
1 (1.3)
Cystic/follicular
1
2
0
0
0
0
3 (3.9)
Follicular/desmoplastic
0
2
0
0
0
0
2 (2.6)
Follicular/acanthomatous
0
0
0
1
0
0
1 (1.3)
Follicular/acanthomatous/cystic
0
1
0
0
0
0
1 (1.3)
Total
14
31
18
5
4
5
77 (100)
Follicular ameloblastoma showed equal gender distribution (Table 2). However all the other histological subtypes with the exception of the follicular, unicystic and follicular/desmoplastic variant occurred more in males. The acanthomatous, basal cell, desmoplastic, follicular/acanthomatous and the follicular/acanthomatous/cystic types occurred exclusively in males. Majority of the cases (72, 93%) occurred in the mandible (Fig 1) while the maxilla accounted for only 2 cases (3%) (Table 2). 3 cases (4%) were reported to have occurred in soft tissue with each presenting in the 2nd, 3rd and 7th decade of life. The posterior mandible comprising of the body and ramus region were involved in 34 cases whose specific sites were known, whereas the anterior region was involved in only 23 cases (Table 3). However there were considerable overlaps in the sites involved in some cases.
Table 2
Distribution of Histological types of Ameloblastoma according location and gender
Location
Histological types
Mandible
Maxilla
Soft tissue
M
F
M
F
M
F
Follicular
24
22
1
0
0
3
Plexiform
6
3
1
0
0
0
Acanthomatous
3
0
0
0
0
0
Basal cell
2
0
0
0
0
0
Desmoplastic
4
0
0
0
0
0
Unicystic
0
1
0
0
0
0
Cystic/Follicular
2
1
0
0
0
0
Follicular/Desmoplastic
0
2
0
0
0
0
Follicular/Acanthomatous
1
0
0
0
0
0
Follicular/Acanthomatous/Cystic
1
0
0
0
0
0
Total
72(93%)
2(3%)
3(4%)
Figure 1
Clinical appearance of a case of ameloblastoma of the mandible.
Table 3
Site distribution of Ameloblastoma of the Mandible
Site
No
%
Anterior Mandible (Incisor-Canine region)
23
40.4
Middle Mandible (Premolar-Molar region)
28
49.1
Posterior Mandible (Ramus region)
6
10.5
Total
57
100.0
* Only tumours with known specific location on the mandible were considered for analysis
Follicular ameloblastoma, the most prevalent histological type (64.9%) seen show the arrangement of the ameloblastomatous cells in discrete islands, with 46 cases occurring in the mandible and only 1 case in the maxilla. Incidentally all the 3 cases occurring in the soft tissue are follicular in type (Table 2). The mean age of occurrence (± SD) was 28.5 ± 11.2 (range 11–70 years) (Table 4) with the peak incidence in the 3rd decade of life (Table 1). 10 cases (13.0%) demonstrated plexiform arrangement of ameloblastomatous cells with a male to female ratio of 2.3:1 (7 males, 3 females). 9 of the cases occurred in the mandible while the maxilla accounted for only 1 (Table 2). The mean age of occurrence (± SD) was 41.3 ± 20.5 (range 16–70 years) (Table 4) and the peak incidence was in the 3rd decade of life (Table 1). Acanthomatous ameloblastoma showing squamous metaplasia of the cells at the center of the tumour islannds accounted for 3 cases (3.9%) with all occurring exclusively in males and in the mandible (Table 2). The mean age of occurrence (± SD) was 61.3 ± 1.2 (range 60–62 years) (Table 4) with a peak incidence in the 7th decade of life (Table 1). Only 2 cases (2.3%) demonstrated features resembling those of basal cell carcinoma of the skin and were seen exclusively in males and in the mandible and within the 4th decade of life (Tables 1 and 2). Desmoplastic ameloblastoma, accounting for 4 cases (5.2%) occurred only in males and in the mandible (Tables 2). The mean age of occurrence (± SD) was 36.5 ± 4.4 (range 25–39 years) (Table 4) with a peak incidence in the 4th decade of life (Tables 1). A diagnosis of unicystic ameloblastoma was made in 1 case (1.3%) with the ameloblastoma arising from the wall of a unilocular odontogenic cyst. It showed mural proliferation of ameloblastomatous cells and occured in the female and in the mandible and in the 4th decade of life (Tables 1 and 2).
Table 4
Analysis of Age of patients (years) according to the Histological type
Histological type
Mean
N
Std Deviation
Minimum
Maximum
Follicular
28.5
50
11.2
11.0
70.0
Plexiform
41.3
10
20.5
16.0
70.0
Acanthomatous
61.3
3
1.2
60.0
62.0
Basal cell
40.0
2
0.0
40.0
40.0
Desmoplastic
36.5
4
4.4
30.0
39.0
Unicystic
40.0
1
0.0
40.0
40.0
Cystic/Follicular
23.7
3
6.5
17.0
30.0
Follicular/Desmoplastic
25.0
2
0.0
25.0
25.0
Follicular/Acanthomatous
45.0
1
0.0
45.0
45.0
Follicular/Acanthomatous/Cystic
21.0
1
0.0
21.0
21.0
Total
32.1
77
14.1
11.0
70.0
Combinations of various histological features (Figs 2 and 3) were demonstrated by some of the cases of ameloblastoma reviewed as analysed in Tables 1, 2 and 4.
Figure 2
Photomicrograph of follicular ameloblastoma exhibiting desmoplasia of the connective tissue stroma (H&E, 100×).
Figure 3
Photomicrograph of follicular ameloblastoma showing cystic degeneration (H&E, 100×).
Discussion
Generally, odontogenic tumours have been reported to be rare and that it takes considerable time for any center to collect representative cases in sufficient numbers [5]. However, mosadomi [6] reporting that ameloblastoma was the most common jaw tumour in Nigerians claimed that West Africans show a predisposition for ameloblastoma. Though this agrees with other reports from the same region [7, 8], it is at variance with findings in Latin America where odontomas were more frequent than ameloblastoma [9, 10]. Numerous histological patterns have been described in ameloblastomas. Some may exhibit a single histological subtype; others may display several histological patterns within the same lesion. Common to nearly all subtypes is the polarization of cells around the proliferating nests in a pattern similar to ameloblasts of the enamel organ [11].
Our observation that follicular ameloblastoma is the most prevalent histological variant (64.9%) in the present study agrees with reports in the literature [8, 11]. This is followed by the plexiform (13.0%), desmoplastic (5.2%) and acanthomatous (3.9%) varieties (Table 1). It should be noted however that in some cases the assessment of predominant histological pattern is undoubtedly subject to some degree of sampling error since it is well known that large ameloblastomas often show a mixture of several histological patterns. Consequently, an accuracy of assessment with respect to the predominant histological subtype based on small biopsy specimen may be questioned. According to Chapple and Manogue [12], follicular ameloblastoma consists of discrete follicles with a similarity to the stellate reticulum of the enamel organ and with a varying quantity of conjunctive tissue stroma. The covering epithelium is columnar or cuboidal with nuclei positioned opposite the basal membrane. Squamous metaplasia such as that seen in acanthomatous ameloblastoma may be attributed to chronic irritation. Calculus and oral sepsis (which could be a source of chronic irritation) have been suggested to play a role in aetiology of ameloblastoma [13].
In this study the wide age range observed for follicular and plexiform ameloblastomas (11–70 years) compare favourably with the reports in Nigeria [7, 8, 14] and Korea [15]. The peak age of incidence in the 3rd decade of life is similar to the reports of Ladeinde et al [16] but differs from the peak incidence of 5th decade reported by Waldrom & El-moffy [17]. However our report showed that acanthomatous variant occurred in the 6th and 7th decades. The 4th decade accounted for all the cases of basal cell variant, unicystic variant and three out of the four reported cases of desmoplastic ameloblastoma.
The reported male predilection of ameloblastoma in the literature [14–16] was confirmed by all the histological variants in this series with the exception of the follicular type which showed equal gender distribution and the unicystic and follicular/desmoplastic type which occurred exclusively in females (Table 2). However other reports from Nigeria [6] and elsewhere [2, 18] showed equal gender distribution while a female predominance was reported in another series [19].
The mandibular predilection of all the histological variants in this series agrees with reports in the literature [7, 16] with only two (3%) (one follicular, one plexiform) out of the 77 cases in our report occurring in the maxilla. The observation that the most common site of occurrence was the middle mandible (premolar-molar region) (Table 3) is consistent with other reports in the literature [8, 17, 20]. The soft tissue accounted for three (4%) reflecting the relatively low incidence of this extraosseous (peripheral) counterpart of the central ameloblastoma. This low incidence agrees with reports in the literature but its distribution in 2nd, 3rd and 7th decades in our series is inconsistent with other reports where the 6th decade was favoured [1, 8, 21]. However, the low number of reported cases in this series provides little ground for comparison with other studies where over 22 cases were reported [1, 21].
There is now more detailed reference to the unicystic variety because it compares favourably with the solid or multicystic counterpart in terms of clinical behaviour and response to treatment [22]. It is a also well known fact that the granular cell variant and ameloblastoma exhibiting clear cell differentiation which were not seen in our series, are more biologically aggressive than other ameloblastomas [23–25], hence the significance of our collected data to the pathologist and clinician
Conclusion
This study provides a baseline data on variants of ameloblastoma as obtained in a suburban Nigerian population. Since variants of ameloblastoma differ in biologic behaviour, the data collected in this study provides clinicopathologic information which is of significance to the pathologist and clinician
Declarations
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
Department of Oral/Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Pathology, Obafemi Awolowo University
(2)
Department of Morbid Anatomy and Forensic Medicine, Obafemi Awolowo University
References
Woo S, Smith-Williams JE, Sciubba JJ, Lippers S: Peripheral Ameloblastoma of the Buccal Mucosa: Case Report and Review of the English literature. Oral surg, Oral Med Oral pathol. 1987, 67: 78-84. 10.1016/0030-4220(87)90344-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Shafer WG, Hine MK, Levy BM, Tomich CE: Ectodermal Tumours of odontogenic origin. 1983, Philadelphia J.B. Saunders, 276-292.Google Scholar
Spouge JD: Odontogenic Tumours. A. Unitarian Concepts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1967, 24: 392-403. 10.1016/0030-4220(67)90080-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Kramer IRH, Pindborg JJ, Shear M: The World Health Organisation Histological Typing of Odontogenic Tumours. Oral Oncol, Eur J Cancer. 1992, 29B: 169-171.Google Scholar
Smith C J: Odontogenic Neoplasms and Harmatomas. Oral Disease in the tropics. 1992, New York: Oxford University Press, 367-385.Google Scholar
Mosadomi A: Odontogenic Tumours in an African Population. Analysis of twenty- nine cases seen over a 5 years period. Oral Surg. 1975, 40: 502-521. 10.1016/0030-4220(75)90248-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Chapple ILC, Manogue M: Management of a recurrent follicular ameloblastoma. Dent Update. 1991, 1: 309-312.Google Scholar
Akinosi JO, Williams AD: Adamantinoma in Ibadan Nigeria. The W.A.M.J. 1968, 45-49.Google Scholar
Subbuswamy SG, Shamia RI: Oral and maxillofacial Tumour in Northern Nigerian: An analysis over five years. Int J Oral Surg. 1981, 10: 255-260.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Kim SG, Jang HS: Ameloblastoma: A clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic analysis of 71 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001, 91 (6): 649-653.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Ladeinde AL, Ajayi OF, Ogunlewe MO, Adeyemo WL, Arotiba GT, Bamgbose BO, Akinwande JA: Odontogenic tumors: A review of 319 cases in a Nigerian teaching hospital. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005, 99: 191-195. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.08.031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Waldron CA, El-Mofty SK: A Histopathologic study of 116 Amelobastoma with special reference to the Desmoplastic variant. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral pathol. 1987, 63: 441-451. 10.1016/0030-4220(87)90257-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Günhan O, Erseven G, Ruacan S, Celasun B, Aydintug Y, Ergun E, Demiriz M: Odontogenic tumors: a series of 409 cases. Austr Dent J. 1990, 35: 518-522.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Regezi JA, Kerr DA, Courtney RM: Odontogenic tumors: analysis of 706 cases. J Oral Surg. 1978, 36: 771-778.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Buckner A, Sciubba JJ: Peripheral Epithelial Odontogenic Tumours: A review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1987, 63: 688-697. 10.1016/0030-4220(87)90372-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Li TJ, Wu YT, Yu SF, Yu GY: Unicystic ameloblastoma, a clinicopathologic study of 33 chinese patients. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000, 24 (10): 1385-1392.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Deshpande A, Umap P, Munshi M: Granular cell ameloblastoma of the jaw. A report of two cases with fine needle aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol. 2000, 44 (1): 81-85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Waldron CA, Small IA, Silverman H: Clear cell ameloblastoma – an odontogenic carcinoma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985, 43 (9): 707-717.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Braunshtein E, Vered M, Taicher S, Buchner A: Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma and clear cell ameloblastoma: a single clinicopathologic entity? A new case and comparative analysis of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003, 61 (9): 1004-1010. 10.1016/S0278-2391(03)00311-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
