Table 7 Results of power and effect test to determine the clinical significance of the differences found between the two methods in measurement of GT (Gingival Thickness)
Comparison-magnitude of difference | 0.2–0.5 Small | 0.5–0.8 Moderate | 0.8 High |
|---|---|---|---|
Comparison of the two methods in measurement of GT in thin biotype at 2 mm distance | 0.34 | ||
Comparison of the two methods in measurement of GT in thick biotype at 2 mm distance | 0.51 | ||
Comparison of the two methods in measurement of GT in thin biotype at 4 mm distance | 0.44 | ||
Comparison of the two methods in measurement of GT in thick biotype at 4 mm distance | 0.32 | ||
Comparison of the two methods in measurement of GT at 2 mm | 0.43 | ||
Comparison of the two methods in measurement of GT at 4 mm | 0.1 | ||
Comparison of the two methods in measurement of GT in the maxilla at 2 mm | 0.48 | ||
Comparison of the two methods in measurement of GT in the mandible at 2 mm | 0.38 | ||
Comparison of the two methods in measurement of GT in the mandible at 4 mm | 0.23 | ||
Comparison of the two methods in measurement of GT in the anterior region at 2 mm | 0.54 | ||
Comparison of the two methods in measurement of GT in the anterior region at 4 mm | 0.14 | ||
Comparison of the two methods in measurement of GT in the premolar region at 2 mm | 0.32 |