Table 2 Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment
Author, year | Newcastle–Ottawa scale outcome (range 0–9) | Quality assessment |
|---|---|---|
1. Matteini, 2001 [26] | 5 | Fair |
2. Babacan, 2006 [27] | 6 | Good |
3. Goldenberg, 2007 [28] | 5 | Fair |
4. Landes, 2009 [29] | 6 | Good |
5. Marchetti, 2009 [30] | 6 | Good |
6. Laudemann, 2009 [31] | 6 | Good |
7. Seeberger, 2010 [32] | 6 | Good |
8. Alfaro, 2010 [33] | 3 | Fair |
9. De Assis, 2010 [34] | 6 | Good |
10. Landim, 2011 [35] | 5 | Fair |
11. Landes, 2012 [37]Â | 6 | Good |
12. Iodice, 2013 [38] | 5 | Fair |
13. Sygouros, 2014 [39] | 4 | Fair |
14. Habersack, 2014 [40] | 7 | Good |
15. Daif, 2014 [5] | 5 | Fair |
16. Adolph,2012 [41] | 3 | Fair |
17. Yao, 2015 [42] | 4 | Fair |
18. Seeberger, 2015 [66] | 6 | Good |
19. Dergin, 2015 [43] | 3 | Fair |
20. Zandi, 2016 [44] | 5 | Fair |
21. Oliveira, 2016 [45] | 5 | Fair |
22. Jensen, 2017 [46] | 6 | Good |
23. Verquin, 2017 [47] | 5 | Fair |
24. Alves, 2017 [48] | 6 | Good |
25. Cakarer, 2017 [67] | 4 | Fair |
26. Kim, 2018 [51] | 5 | Fair |
27. Krzysztof, 2018 | 5 | Fair |
28. Huizinga, 2018 [6] | 6 | Good |
29. Möhlhenrich, 2020 [54] | 5 | Fair |
30. Keskin-Yalcin, 2020 [55] | 4 | Fair |
31. Gursoytrak, 2021 [56] | 6 | Good |
32. Da Costa Senior, 2021 [57] | 5 | Fair |
33. Pereira, 2022 [59] | 6 | Good |
34. Orion, 2022 [60] | 4 | Fair |
35. Felipe, 2022 [61] | 5 | Fair |
36. Carvalho, 2023 [62] | 6 | Good |