Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the surface roughness (µm) among test and control groups

From: Puricelli biconvex arthroplasty: an experimental study in sheep

Group

Surface roughness (µm)

Control

1.56 (± 0.61) B

Condylar without wear

2.67 (± 0.57) C

Condylar with wear

0.17 (± 0.09) A

Temporal without wear

1.55 (± 0.08) B

Temporal with wear

0.11 (± 0.04) A

  1. Data is presented as mean ± standard deviation and compared using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey post-hoc tests. Different capital letters represent the presence of statistical differences (p < 0.05)
Back to article page

Head & Face Medicine

ISSN: 1746-160X

Contact us