Skip to main content

Table 6 Fracture and non-fracture sides for each approach

From: Is the retromandibular approach a suitable approach to anatomical reduction of unilateral subcondylar fracture? A non-randomized clinical trial

Independent t-test

Acronym

Submandibular approach

P value

Retromandibular approach

P value

Fracture side

Non-fracture side

Fracture side

Non-fracture side

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

CDMLi (HP)

8.4

2

13.3

3

0.001

10.7

2

12.2

1.7

0.03

CDVi (VP)

57.8

11

60.9

8

0.45

61.7

19

66.6

11.2

0.4

CDAPi (MSP)

64.2

9

76.8

5

0.001

72

7

74

6.8

0.42

CDVp

3.3

0.7

2.5

0.6

0.007

2.1

0.7

2.7

0.7

0.01

CDAPp

7.6

1.7

6.8

3

0.38

7.7

4

7.3

2.5

0.74

CDMLp

46

3.6

49.9

4

0.02

52.9

4

50.2

3.3

0.06

AJS

2.5

0.7

2.1

0.7

0.11

2.7

0.6

2.1

0.8

0.03

PJS

2.1

0.4

2.4

0.2

0.06

2.2

0.4

2.1

0.4

0.71

MJS

1.8

0.7

2.6

1

0.04

2.6

1

2.8

1.2

0.57

SJS

3.2

1.1

2.2

0.7

0.21

2.3

0.7

2

0.6

0.25

  1. Bold is less than 0.05
Back to article page

Head & Face Medicine

ISSN: 1746-160X

Contact us