Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparing methods of measurements in terms of ΔE and ΔE00: 2D versus 3D within visual or electronical measurement; visual versus electronical measurements within 2D and 3D

From: New insights in the reproducibility of visual and electronic tooth color assessment for dental practice

 

Visual versus electronical

2D versus 3D

within 2D

within 3D

within visual

within electronical

Value

Value

Value

Value

Paired observations, number

839a

840a

1680b

1679c

Mean ΔE (standard deviation)

2.53 (2.17)

2.99 (2.21)

3.46 (1.66)

3.91 (1.29)

Agreement within ΔE < 2.7, proportion (95% CI)

59.6 (56.2–62.9)*,**

40.6 (37.3–44.0)-,*

45.2 (42.8–47.6)*

18.6 (16.7–20.5)--,-

Agreement within ΔE < 3.7, proportion (95% CI)

67.2 (63.9–70.4)**

68.5 (65.3–71.7)**

52.9 (50.5–55.3)*

46.6 (44.2–49.0)*

Mean ΔE00 (standard deviation)

2.08 (1.80)

2.37 (1.82)

3.26 (1.23)

3.50 (1.00)

Agreement within ΔE00 < 2.7, proportion (95% CI)

62.9 (59.6–65.5)*,**

56.0 (52.5–59.3)*

45.8 (43.4–48.2)*

23.5 (21.5–25.6)−

Agreement within ΔE00 < 3.7, proportion (95% CI)

82.1 (79.4–84.7)**,***

75.2 (72.2–78.1)**

71.7 (69.5–73.9)**

64.6 (62.3–66.9)**

  1. a V2 versus E1, V3 versus E3, V5 versus E5 acc. to the flow chart
  2. b D2 versus D3 measurements for V1 – V6 acc. to the flow chart
  3. c D2 versus D3 measurements for E1 – E6 acc. to the flow chart
  4. Classifications for the interpretation of agreement
  5. −− poor < 20; − slight [20–40); * fair [40–60); ** good [60–80); *** very good [80–92)