Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparison of the accuracy of different impression procedures in case of multiple and angulated implants

Original Submission
23 Sep 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Dec 2019 Author responded Author comments - M. Wafa Richi
28 Jan 2020 Author responded Author comments - M. Wafa Richi
30 Sep 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anthony Francis Markus
20 Nov 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lisiane Bernardi
2 Dec 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christian Mertens
6 Dec 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anthony Francis Markus
15 Dec 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christian Mertens
21 Jan 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Barbara de Lima Lucas
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Dec 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Mar 2020 Author responded Author comments - M. Wafa Richi
29 Jan 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anthony Francis Markus
29 Jan 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christian Mertens
7 Mar 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Narayan H. Gandedkar
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Mar 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Mar 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anthony Francis Markus
25 Mar 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christian Mertens
29 Mar 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Narayan H. Gandedkar
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Apr 2020 Editorially accepted
4 May 2020 Article published 10.1186/s13005-020-00225-3

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page