Skip to main content

Table 2 Select demographic and phenotypic characteristics of 39 participants with CFM based on physical exama

From: Reliable classification of facial phenotypic variation in craniofacial microsomia: a comparison of physical exam and photographs

 

All (n = 39)

Microtia/anotia only (n = 8)

Facial hypoplasia and microtiab (n = 15)

Facial hypoplasia without microtiac (n = 5)

Microtia without facial hypoplasiab (n = 6)

Neither facial hypoplasia nor microtiac (n = 5)

Characteristic

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

Race

 White

18 (46)

3 (38)

8 (50)

4 (80)

3 (60)

0 (0)

 Asian

14 (36)

2 (25)

6 (38)

1 (20)

2 (40)

3 (60)

 Native American

2 (5)

2 (25)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

 Other

5 (13)

1 (13)

2 (13)

0 (0)

0 (0)

2 (40)

Ethnicity

 Non-Hispanic

32 (82)

6 (75)

13 (81)

5 (100)

4 (80)

4 (80)

 Hispanic

7 (18)

2 (25)

3 (19)

0 (0)

1 (20)

1 (20)

Age

 <1

2 (5)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

1 (17)

1 (20)

 1–5

11 (28)

2 (25)

5 (33)

2 (40)

2 (33)

0 (0)

 >5–10

13 (33)

2 (25)

5 (33)

1 (20)

3 (50)

2 (40)

 >10–15

5 (13)

1 (13)

1 (7)

1 (20)

0 (0)

2 (40)

 >15–21

8 (21)

3 (38)

4 (27)

1 (20)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Sex

 Male

20 (51)

4 (50)

7 (47)

5 (100)

2 (33)

2 (40)

Microtia or Anotia

 None

10 (26)

0 (0)

0 (0)

5 (100)

0 (0)

5 (100)

 Unilateral

26 (67)

8 (100)

12 (80)

0 (0)

6 (100)

0 (0)

 Bilateral

3 (8)

0 (0)

3 (20)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Facial Hypoplasia

 None

19 (49)

8 (100)

0 (0)

0 (0)

6 (100)

5 (100)

 Unilateral

17 (44)

0 (0)

14 (93)

3 (60)

0 (0)

0 (0)

 Bilateral

3 (8)

0 (0)

1 (7)

2 (40)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Dermoid

 None

36 (92)

8 (100)

14 (93)

5 (100)

5 (83)

4 (80)

 Unilateral

3 (8)

0 (0)

1 (7)

0 (0)

1 (17)

1 (20)

Any Tag

 None

21 (54)

8 (100)

9 (60)

1 (20)

1 (17)

2 (40)

 Unilateral

14 (36)

0 (0)

5 (33)

3 (60)

3 (50.0)

3 (60)

 Bilateral

4 (10)

0 (0)

1 (7)

1 (20)

2 (33)

0 (0)

Any Pit

 None

36 (92)

8 (100)

12 (80)

5 (100)

6 (100)

5 (100)

 Unilateral

3 (8)

0 (0)

3 (20)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Lateral Oral Cleft

 None

33 (85)

8 (100)

12 (80)

3 (60)

5 (83)

5 (100)

 Unilateral

5 (13)

0 (0)

3 (20)

1 (20)

1 (17)

0 (0)

 Bilateral

1 (3)

0 (0)

0 (0)

1 (20)

0 (0)

0 (0)

  1. aEach clinician rated at least 11 participants (n = 11, 15 and 13, respectively)
  2. bWith or without other features from the FACIAL inclusion criteria
  3. cWith other features from the FACIAL inclusion criteria
Back to article page

Head & Face Medicine

ISSN: 1746-160X

Contact us