Skip to main content

Table 1 Detection rates of anatomic variations and lesions in the maxillary sinus by imaging modality in both groups of patient

From: The significance of cone beam computed tomography for the visualization of anatomical variations and lesions in the maxillary sinus for patients hoping to have dental implant-supported maxillary restorations in a private dental office in Japan

Anatomic variations and lesions of the maxillary sinus

Detection rates (Frequency)

  

With

Without

Total

Panoramic radiographs

CBCT

Panoramic radiographs

CBCT

Panoramic radiographs

CBCT

Anatomic variations

      

Pneumatization

38% (20/55)

42% (23/55)

40% (21/52)

40% (21/52)

38% (41/47)

41% (44/107)

Septa

33% (17/55)

51% (28/55)

29% (15/52)

46% (24/52)

30% (32/107)

49% (52/107)

Hypoplasia

4% (2/55)

4% (2/55)

0% (0/52)

0% (0/52)

2% (2/107)

2% (2/107)

Aplasia

0% (0/55)

0% (0/55)

0% (0/52)

0% (0/52)

0% (0/107)

0% (0/107)

Lesions

      

Mucosal thickening

15% (8/55)

62% (32/55)

11% (6/52)

38% (20/52)

13% (14/107)

49% (52/107)

SOL

5% (3/55)

18% (10/55)

19% (10/52)

33% (17/52)

12% (13/107)

25% (27/107)

Discontinuity of the sinus floor

4% (2/55)

9% (5/55)

4% (2/52)

8% (4/52)

4% (4/107)

8% (9/107)

Fluid retention

0% (0/55)

0% (0/55)

0% (0/52)

0% (0/52)

0% (0/107)

0% (0/107)

Bone thickening

5% (3/55)

9% (5/55)

2% (1/52)

2% (1/52)

4% (4/107)

6% (6/107)

Antrolith

2% (1/55)

7% (4/55)

0% (0/52)

2% (1/52)

1% (1/107)

5% (5/107)

Exostosis

0% (0/55)

0% (0/55)

2% (1/52)

6% (3/52)

1% (1/107)

3% (3/107)

Sinus opacification

13% (7/55)

24% (13/55)

6% (3/52)

12% (6/52)

9% (10/107)

18% (19/107)

Foreign body

0% (0/55)

0% (0/55)

0% (0/52)

0% (0/52)

0% (0/107)

0% (0/107)

  1. SOL: Space occupying lesion **p < 0.01.
  2. CBCT: Come beam computed tomography *p < 0.05.