Histological analysis of the effects of a static magnetic field on bone healing process in rat femurs
- Edela Puricelli†1Email author,
- Lucienne M Ulbrich†2,
- Deise Ponzoni†2 and
- João Julio da Cunha Filho†2
© Puricelli et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 15 February 2006
Accepted: 24 November 2006
Published: 24 November 2006
The aim of this study was to investigate, in vivo, the quality of bone healing under the effect of a static magnetic field, arranged inside the body.
A metallic device was developed, consisting of two stainless steel washers attached to the bone structure with titanium screws. Twenty-one Wistar rats (Rattus novergicus albinus) were used in this randomized experimental study. Each experimental group had five rats, and two animals were included as control for each of the groups. A pair of metal device was attached to the left femur of each animal, lightly touching a surgically created bone cavity. In the experimental groups, washers were placed in that way that they allowed mutual attraction forces. In the control group, surgery was performed but washers, screws or instruments were not magnetized. The animals were sacrificed 15, 45 and 60 days later, and the samples were submitted to histological analysis.
On days 15 and 45 after the surgical procedure, bone healing was more effective in the experimental group as compared to control animals. Sixty days after the surgical procedure, marked bone neoformation was observed in the test group, suggesting the existence of continued magnetic stimulation during the experiment.
The magnetic stainless steel device, buried in the bone, in vivo, resulted in increased efficiency of the experimental bone healing process.
Bone neoformation is of primary importance for the success of dental clinical-surgical treatments. Much attention has been given to the research of new strategies to improve oral maxillofacial surgical techniques, as well as on the knowledge and application of biomaterials  an their possible chemical and physical consequences on the patients.
Electromagnetic fields have been used for the stimulation of bone neoformation processes. Their effects are observed in the treatment of osteoporosis, osteonecrosis, osteotomized areas, integration of bone grafts and post-traumatic pseudarthrosis . Several cell functions were also shown to be influenced by electromagnetic fields [3, 4]. Electromagnetism affects osteogenesis through mechanisms such as neovascularization, collagen production, proliferation and differentiation of osteogenic cells, and the maintenance of the molecular structure of the extracellular matrix [5–7].
The objective of the present study is to contribute to the understanding of processes involved in the response of bone to electromagnetic fields, by evaluation of cortical and trabecular bone neoformation. Cell stimulation was induced by static, in vivo buried magnetic fields.
Twenty-one male Wistar rats (Rattus novergicus albinus) were used in this randomized experimental study, aiming at the use of permanent magnetic fields buried in vivo. The animals were six-months old and weighed in average 450 grams. They were divided into three experimental and control groups, which were analyzed on days 15, 45 and 60 after beginning of the experiment.
The metal devices consisted of commercially pure martensitic stainless steel washers and titanium screws. The screws measured 1.0 mm in diameter, 0.5 mm in thread pitch and 2.0 mm in length. The pre-made magnetized washers were 3.0 mm in outer diameter, 1.5 mm in core diameter and 0.5 mm in thick. They were held over a 60 mm × 12 mm × 5 mm magnet during the sterilization process and surgery. The magnetic field was 41 Gauss (G). Calculations were performed at the Electromagnetism Laboratory, Physics Institute from Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
The animals were anesthetized by intraperiotoneal injection of sodium tiopenthal in a dose of 25 mg/kg body weight and local infiltration of 3% prilocaine with felypressin.
The placement and stability of implants were confirmed by radiographic examination at the end of the experiments. Samples were submitted to longitudinal sectioning of the femur, which allowed simultaneous examination of the surgical cavity between the screw holes. The samples were prepared in hematoxylin and eosin stain (HE) for histological analysis.
As in many other studies reported, rat was also used as a model in this study [1, 6, 8–10]. The advantages include easy manipulation, maintenance and adaptation to the objectives of the study. Other animals have been used, such as rabbits [7, 11, 12] or dogs .
This experimental study was based on investigations reported by Brighton (apud Christian) ; Burkitt, Young and Heath ; Hunter (apud Christian) ; and Lane and Davis (apud Christian) . The surgically prepared bone cavity presented only one ruptured cortical, maintaining thus the reproducibility of a fixed fracture .
The metallic washers were attached to the bone structure with titanium screws. Biocompatibility of titanium with the spongeous medullary area has already been shown by Veeck, Puricelli and Souza . Due to technical difficulties, the stainless steel washers were not protected against corrosion, differing thus from those used by Lemons and Natiella . Martensitic stainless steel relates to the classification described by Chiaverini . The need for externally adapted electric currents was avoided by the generation of a magnetic field through buried magnets, which resulted in a constant field with no need for reactivation during the experimental period.
A 41 G magnetic field was used, significantly higher than that of previously reported studies such as those of Grace, Revell and Brookes ; Matsumoto et al. ; Fini et al. ; Aaron, Wang and Ciombor ; and Ciombor et al. , in which intensities of 12 G, 2 G, 16 G, 16 G and 16 G were employed respectively. The expressive difference in charge was due to lack of calibration information in literature reports, and to the novelty represented by devices which keep an active, isolated field with no possible reactivation.
Different in vitro and in vivo experimental systems have been used for the investigation of electric fields effects in vital tissues. Bodamyali et al.  and Ishisaka et al.  described the use of weak magnets for in vitro cell stimulation, but observed little activity in this system. In vivo studies were performed by Grace, Revell and Brookes ; Matsumoto et al. ; Fini et al. ; Aaron, Wang and Ciombor ; Ciombor et al.  and Inoue et al. , with daily application of electromagnetic fields during 2, 8, 6, 1, 8 and 8 hours respectively. Experiments were conducted during periods between 2 days and 8 weeks, and the studies were characterized by the use of an electromagnetic field with continuous stimulation.
According to Halliday et al. , the electric neutrality of a body is modified when it is submitted to a magnetic field. Reports by Oishi and Onesti  and Teló  suggest that cell electronegativity at bone fractures and after cancer treatment should be regarded as a possible indication of electric modifications on the local wound.
The extensive trabecular formation beginning in the endosteum, histologically observed in the surgical bone cavity in samples from the test groups as early as 15 days later, suggests that the magnetic field stimulates bone healing.
On day 45, neoformed bone was rather similar to the surrounding bone tissue in test and control groups, showing the presence of a first intention healing process as stated by Lane and Danis (apud Christian) . In the test group, however, stronger neovascularization as well as osteoclastic and bone remodelling activities were observed.
On day 60, besides marked external configuration of the magnetic washers with cortical bone, the establishment of bone projections beyond the external border of the previously osteotomized cortical was observed. These results suggest that the magnetic field was active during all the experimental period. Even though they cannot be strictly compared to the studies of Grace, Revell and Brookes ; Matsumoto et al. ; Fini et al. ; and Fredericks et al. , since these authors used intermittent electromagnetic fields, the results of the present work agree with the accelerated bone neoformation reported.
The histological observation of hematopoietic activity in the bone marrow is an important result. Urist, Delange and Finermann  and Grace, Revell and Brookes  suggested that cartilage formation is due to a shortage of blood supply. The results of the present study, with in vivo observations during a period of 60 days, show that blood supply to the region was not impaired, but on the contrary was stimulated, which may explain the absence of cartilage formation during the healing process.
The results of the present experimental work indicate that further studies are needed for the detailed analysis of the in vivo activity and best intensity of magnetic stimulation on healing bone tissue.
The magnetized stainless steel material used in these studies is able to affect the bone healing process;
The comparison of test and control groups indicates that bone healing was accelerated by the effect of magnetic fields in all the conditions analyzed;
The marked configuration of a bone outline involving the metallic devices in the test group, observed until the end of the experimental period, suggests that the magnetic field exerted a constant local activity on the surgical wound.
We would like to thank Prof. Dr. Paulo Pureur Neto (Physics Institute, UFRGS), Marcel Fasolo de Paris (Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Hospital Moinhos de Vento) and Isabel Regina Pucci (Manager, Instituto Puricelli & Associados).
This study is in accordance with the guidelines for animal research established by the State Code for Animal Protection and Normative Rule 04/97 from the Research and Ethics in Health Committee/GPPG/HCPA.
- Veeck EB, Puricelli E, Souza MAL: Análise do comportamento do osso e da medula hemopoética em relação a implantes de titânio e hidroxiapatita: estudo experimental em fêmur de rato. Odonto Ciência. 1995, 10: 235-291.Google Scholar
- Oishi M, Onesti ST: Electrical Bone Graft Stimulation for Spinal Fusion: A Review. Neurosurgery. 2000, 47: 1041-1056. 10.1097/00006123-200011000-00005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ishisaka R, Kanno T, Inai Y, Nakahara H, Akiyama J, Yoshioka T, Utsumi K: Effects of a magnetic field on the various functions of subcellular organelles and cells. Pathophysiology. 2000, 7: 149-152. 10.1016/S0928-4680(00)00043-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Teló M: O uso da corrente elétrica no tratamento do câncer. Edited by: Teló M et al. 2004, Porto Alegre: EdipucrsGoogle Scholar
- Aaron RK, Ciombor DM: Therapeutic Effects of Electromagnetic Fields in the Stimulation of Connective Tissue Repair. J Cell Biochem. 1993, 52: 42-46. 10.1002/jcb.240520107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grace KL, Revell WJ, Brookes M: The Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetism on Fresh Fracture Healing: Osteochondral Repair in the Rat Femoral Groove. Orthopedics. 1998, 21: 297-302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsumoto H, Ochi M, Abiko Y, Hirose Y, Kaku T, Sakaguchi K: Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields Promote Bone Formation Around Dental Implants Inserted into the Femur of Rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000, 11: 354-360. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011004354.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagai N, Inoue M, Ishiwari Y, Nagatsuka H, Tsujigiwa H, Nakano K, Nagaoka N: Age and Magnetic Effects on Ectopic Bone Formation Induced by Purified Bone Morphogenetic Protein. Pathophysiology. 2000, 7: 107-114. 10.1016/S0928-4680(00)00036-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aaron RK, Wang S, Ciombor DM: Upregulation of Basal TGFbeta1 Levels by EMF Coincident with Chondrogenesis: Implications for Skeletal Repair and Tissue Engineering. J Orthop Res. 2002, 20: 233-240. 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00084-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ciombor DM, Lester G, Aaron RK, Neame P, Caterson B: Low Frequency EMF Regulates Chondrocyte Differentiation and Expression of Matrix Proteins. J Orthop Res. 2002, 20: 40-50. 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00071-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fini M, Cadossi R, Cane V, Cavani F, Giavaresi G, Krajewski A, Martini L, Aldini NN, Ravaglioli A, Rimondini L, Torricelli P, Giardino R: The Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on the Osteointegration of Hydroxyapatite Implants in Cancellous Bone: A Morphologic and Microstructural In Vivo Study. J Orthop Res. 2002, 20: 756-763. 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00158-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fredericks DC, Nepola JV, Baker JT, Abbott J, Simon B: Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulation on Distraction Osteogenesis in the Rabbit Tibial Leg Lengthening Model. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003, 23: 478-483. 10.1097/00004694-200307000-00012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inoue N, Ohnishi I, Chen D, Deitz LW, Schwardt JD, Chao EY: Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMF) on Late-phase Osteotomy Gap Healing in a Canine Tibial Model. J Orthop Res. 2002, 20: 106-114.Google Scholar
- Christian CA: General Principles of Fracture Treatment. Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics. Edited by: Canale ST, Daugherty K, Jones L. 1996, St. Louis: Mosby, 3: 1993-2041. 9Google Scholar
- Burkitt HG, Young B, Heath JW: Wheater Histologia Funcional. 1994, Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 3Google Scholar
- Feinberg SE, Steinberg B, Helman JI: Healing of Traumatic Injuries. Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma. Edited by: Fonseca RJ, Walker RV. 1997, Philadelphia: Saunders, 1: 13-57.Google Scholar
- Lemons J, Natiella J: Biomaterials, Biocompatibility, and Peri-Implant Considerations. Dent Clin North Am. 1986, 30: 3-23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chiaverini V: Aços Resistentes à Corrosão. Aços e Ferros Fundidos. 1982, São Paulo: Associação Brasileira de Metais, 322-357. 5Google Scholar
- Bodamyali T, Bhatt B, Hughes FJ, Winrow VR, Kanczler JM, Simon B, Abbott J, Blake DR, Stevens CR: Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields Simultaneously Induce Osteogenesis and Upregulate Transcription. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998, 250: 458-461. 10.1006/bbrc.1998.9243.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Halliday : Eletromagnetismo. Fundamentos de Física. Edited by: Halliday et al. 1994, Rio de Janeiro: Livros Técnicos e Científicos, 3: 3Google Scholar
- Urist MR, Delande RJ, Finerman GAM: Bone Cell Differentiation and Growth Factors. Science. 1983, 220: 680-686. 10.1126/science.6403986.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.