Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Vascular basis of mucosal color

  • Johannes Kleinheinz1Email author,
  • André Büchter1,
  • Thomas Fillies1 and
  • Ulrich Joos1
Head & Face Medicine20051:4

DOI: 10.1186/1746-160X-1-4

Received: 26 March 2005

Accepted: 24 August 2005

Published: 24 August 2005

Abstract

Background

Besides the color of the teeth the color of the alveolar gingiva plays a crucial role in esthetic rehabilitation in dento-alveolar treatment. Whereas nowadays the color of the teeth can be determined exactly and individually, the specific influence of the red color of the gingiva on treatment has not been assessed yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the vascularization as the basis for gingival esthetics.

Methods

Standardized photographs of defined areas of the alveolar gingiva in operated and non-operated patients were taken and assigned to groups with same characteristics after color comparisons. In addition, histologic and immunohistologic analyses of gingival specimens were performed for qualitative and quantitative assessment of vessels and vascularization. Finally, colors and number of vessels were correlated.

Results

Our results demonstrated three different constellations of colors of the alveolar gingiva in healthy patients. The operated patients could not be grouped because of disparate depiction. There was a clear correlation between color and vessel number in the alveolar gingiva.

Conclusion

Our investigations revealed the connections between vascularization and gingival color. Recommendations for specific change or even selection of colors based on the results cannot be given, but the importance of vascularly based incision lines was demonstrated.

Background

Esthetic rehabilitation in dento-alveolar surgery was focused solely on reconstruction of position, shape and color of teeth for a long time. Significant improvement was achieved when reconstruction of form and volume of the peri- and paradental or periimplant soft tissue was added to the protocol. Esthetic impression depends on a coordinated interaction of red and white colors of dental and gingival structures. Nowadays the dental color is chosen in a very differentiated and individual way allowing the patient him/herself to select the color of the teeth to be replaced according to the neighbouring or missing teeth. In contrast the red color of the gingiva originates from acrylics, composite resins, silicones or porcelain-based materials which lack the range of differentiation of the white color. In cases without reestablishment of the red color the present red color is taken over regardless of color changes due to surgery. The role of the red color of the soft tissue is still unclear because of lack of complete fundamental knowledge, making definition of a starting point for a specific treatment of color changes impossible. The aim of this study was to evaluate the different mucosal and gingival colors and to classify them according to defined criteria. In addition, the vascular basis was analysed using histologic sections from the oral mucosa and compared with the colors.

Methods

Clinical evaluation

Standardized digital photographs of the maxillary and mandibular gingiva (#13 to 23 and #33 to 43) (Fig. 1) of healthy unoperated and healthy operated dentulous patients were taken (Minolta 3CCD digital with AF 50 macroobjective and ring flash). Healthy unoperated patients without previous surgery in the areas of interest were selected. Healthy operated patients had scars of the mucosa after surgery. The scar had to be in the defined areas, at least as long as two teeth and at least one year old (Fig. 2). None of the patients of both groups did show any sign of periodontal or gingival infection. The photographs were analyzed according to the following criteria: colors of attached and unattachedgingiva and color of the muco-gingival line(linea girlandiformis). Standardized color assignment was achieved by adjustment of the digital pictures using a standardized color scale and accordant wave length (Image Tool 3.0, University of Texas Health Center, San Antonio, USA) (Fig. 3). For each patient the color of the attached and unattached gingiva was determined, separately for maxilla and mandible.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-160X-1-4/MediaObjects/13005_2005_Article_4_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Demonstration of region of interest in the maxilla and mandible. There is a clear horizontal formation of different red coloring.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-160X-1-4/MediaObjects/13005_2005_Article_4_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Paramarginal scars produce a complete different pattern of colors in comparison with healthy mucosa.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-160X-1-4/MediaObjects/13005_2005_Article_4_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

A standardized color scale was the basis for the determination of the wave length to compare the different coloring.

Histology and immunohistology

Specimens of the gingiva were taken during tumor surgery. Intraoperatively, the area of interest had been photodocumented before tumor resection. Gingival specimens were taken after the pathologist had evaluated the borders of the block and excluded any tumorinfiltration. Coloration was also classified using the same color scale as described above. After fixation and paraffin-embedding, specimens were cut demonstrating the whole area of the gingiva (attached and unattached). By means of immunohistological staining of the vessels using CD31 (DAKO, Hamburg, Germany) distribution of the vessels inside the gingiva was evaluated qualitatively in each specimen. The number of vessels was counted in 5 randomly selected so-called hot spots [1] for both keratinized and non-keratinized areas with defined magnification.

Analyses covered qualitative description of the distribution of the vessels in the different parts of the gingiva, quantitative assessment of the number of vessels in the keratinized and non-keratinized areas. Statistical analysis covered the comparison of distribution of vessels using t-test (significance level p < 0.05), and correlation between number of vessels and wave length/color of the different areas of the gingiva using a linear Spearman correlation analysis and calculation of coefficient of correlation.

Results

Standardized photographs from 54 healthy unoperated patients and 32 operated patients were analysed. For histological and immunohistological analyses 28 gingival specimens were available.

Clinical evaluation

In almost all patients characteristic formations of alveolar soft tissue was found which was divided into area of attached gingiva (gingiva propria), transition zone (muco-gingival line, linea girlandiformis) and unattached area (alveolar mucosa, gingival mucosa). This subdivision was not only because of mobility and surface structure but especially because of nuances of the red color. It was demonstrated that the muco-gingival line does not represent an independent anatomic structure with an own coloring but does appear as expression of the transition from attached to unattached gingiva, demonstrating the result of structural and color-coordinated changes.

Qualitative evaluation and classification

Qualitative evaluation of the photodocumentation according to the mentioned criteria resulted in three subgroups of the healthy unoperated patient cohort. These subgroups were again subdivided according to the intensity of the muco-gingival line (Table 1). Group 1 generally demonstrated pale coloring of both gingival parts (Fig. 4), group 2 showed pronounced coloration of both regions (Fig. 5) and group 3 had a distinct color difference between both gingival parts (Fig. 6). With the dark-colored part always appearing in the area of the unattachedand the light-colored part in the area of the attached gingiva. The photographs of the operated patients (Fig. 7) did not allow any grouping or classification because of scar formation and thus strongly different colors. It was demonstrated that the naturally horizontally aligned layering of color nuances was strongly disturbed by scarring, leading to loss of defined transition zones.
Table 1

Distribution of patients on three clinical different groups. Mucogingival line was distinctive in cases of pronounced changes of coloring in group 3

 

mucogingival line

mucosa

distinct

not distinct

group 1: light

4

10

group 2: dark

5

12

group 3: combined

16

7

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-160X-1-4/MediaObjects/13005_2005_Article_4_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Group 1 showed a light presentation in both areas, the mucogingival line was not distinct.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-160X-1-4/MediaObjects/13005_2005_Article_4_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

The second group was dominated by a dark color, the mucogingival line was also not pronounced.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-160X-1-4/MediaObjects/13005_2005_Article_4_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

The distinct mucogingival line in the third group is the consequence of the marked changes of coloring.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-160X-1-4/MediaObjects/13005_2005_Article_4_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

Scar tissue led to loss of horizontal formation of the red colors. Building up of a classification in operated cases was not possible.

Histological evaluation

The natural structure of the gingiva was evaluated histologically including keratinized and non-keratinized areas. The vessels were clearly demonstrated in both areas and their distribution analyzed. There was a strongly vascularized area under the epithelium layers in the lamina propria of the mucosa (Fig. 8).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-160X-1-4/MediaObjects/13005_2005_Article_4_Fig8_HTML.jpg
Figure 8

Histologic section (Azan staining, magnification ×10) demonstrates the vascular area in the submucous lamina propria.

Quantification and correlation

Using immunohistological staining the endothelial cells were marked specifically and the vessels analyzed quantitatively (Fig. 9). The number of vessels showed slight differences concerning keratinization of the gingiva but these were not statistically significant (Fig. 10). The small number of vessels in the area of the attached and keratinized gingiva has to be seen in context with the overall thinner mucosal layer in the marginal area. In both groups small number of vessels resulted in significantly lighter, high number of vessels in significantly darker coloration. For each area, statistical analyses showed a significant correlation between number of vessels and wave length (Fig. 11).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-160X-1-4/MediaObjects/13005_2005_Article_4_Fig9_HTML.jpg
Figure 9

Immunohistologic staining of endothelial cells with CD 31 was the basis for evaluation of number of vessels.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-160X-1-4/MediaObjects/13005_2005_Article_4_Fig10_HTML.jpg
Figure 10

Numbers of vessels in attached and unattached areas of the gingiva showed no significant differences.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-160X-1-4/MediaObjects/13005_2005_Article_4_Fig11_HTML.jpg
Figure 11

There is a distinctive positive correlation between number of vessels and color (defined as wave length) in both attached (coefficient of correlation r = 0,889) and unattached gingiva (coefficient of correlation r = 0,870). The higher the number of vessels the darker the color and the higher the wave length. Areas of attached gingiva showed more light colors on average.

Discussion

To date scientific evaluation of the gingival mucosa concentrated on two fields both disregarding the color. On the one hand, vascularization of oral mucosa was investigated using different techniques (perfusion and plastination [2, 3], histology [4], laserdoppler flowmetry [5], fluorangiography [6]), and, in particular, under the aspect of changes caused by local infections [79] or general diseases [10, 11]. At this the evaluations were far beyond simple morphological descriptions and reached the level of molecular and genetical changes [11, 12]. On the other hand, the muco-gingival or alveolar soft tissue surgery became more and more important especially in implantology aiming at optimal esthetic outcome. Main emphasis was placed on incision design, flap design and flap raising [13], soft tissue grafts [1416] and microsurgical techniques. Targets were substitution of volume and structure and shape design but not the correction or change of color.

The combination of reconstruction/rehabilitation and coloration, which must arise from the causal interrelationship, was mentioned only to a small extent, still lacking direct therapeutical influence of the gingival color.

The natural changes of color from the attached to the unattached gingiva can be traced back to two factors: the different degrees of keratinization and the degree of vascularization. The more keratinization the attached gingiva shows the less gleaming of the vessels and the more ligth-colored the gingiva. Keratinization can strongly differ interindividually and mainly depends on mechanical loading and degree of elimination of dead cell layers.

The degree of vascularization also correlates to local mechanical loading and host response. Acute and florid periodontal and gingival infections lead to a hyperemia resulting in change of color [7]. The more distinct the infections, the darker the red color will be.

Considering the results of this study and those published in the literature it seems reasonable to avoid any changes of the red color of the gingiva during treatment, if possible, because currently there are no adequate tools or techniques to change the color in a way that is adapted to the individual situation and provides stability. In addition, it is necessary to optimize incisions in every single case to avoid pronounced changes of the natural anatomy and, thus local vascularization. That means that esthetically critical regions like the upper anterior area should not be incised obliquely or perpendicular to the course of the vessels. The incision must not disturb or interrupt the main vascularization inside the gingiva. Investigations by Cranin [17] clearly demonstrated that unfavorable incisions lead to disorientation of vessels and, therefore, delayed wound healing, scar formation and bone loss. Reorientation and regeneration of vessels will lead to changes of the color which will rarely adapt to the individual situation. Traumatisingpreparation techniques can end up in a subepithelial fibrosiswhich also influences the coloration. Microsurgical techniques and the use of appropriate instruments and magnification led to more reliable and stable color results.

Medicamentous therapies of periodontal diseases [18] or general diseases [19] were analyzed concerning their impact on morphological changes of the epithelium and the connective tissue and the degree of vascularization however recommendations for distinct treatment of colors could not be derived from these results.

Conclusion

Conservation or rehabilitation of the red color of the gingiva can only be achieved by preserving the natural structures, precise and atraumatic interventions and avoidance or treatment of any inflammatory sources. The red coloration depends on the degree of keratinization and the distribution and the number of blood vessels. A distinct and durable influence on the color by surgical or medicamentous treatments seems to be impossible at present. It is recommended to change the soft tissue as less as possible during treatment to preserve natural and individual coloration.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Muenster

References

  1. Takano S, Yoshii Y, Kondo S, Suzuki H, Maruno T, Shirai S, Nose T: Concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor in the serum and tumor tissue of brain tumor patients. Cancer Res. 1996, 56: 2185-2190.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Nobuto T, Tokioka T, Imai H, Suwa F, Ohta Y, Yamaoka A: Microvascularization of gingival wound healing using corrosion casts. J Periodontol. 1987, 58: 240-246.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Novaes AB, Kon S, Ruben MP, Novaes AB: Rebuilding of microvascularization following surgical gingival elimination by split flap. Study by perfusion and diaphanization. J Periodontol. 1976, 47: 217-223.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Garfunkel A, Sciaky I: Vascularization of the periodontal tissues in the adult laboratory rat. J Dent Res. 1971, 50: 880-887.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Baab DA, Oberg PA: Laser Doppler measurement of gingival blood flow in dogs with increasing and decreasing inflammation. Arch Oral Biol. 1987, 32: 551-555. 10.1016/0003-9969(87)90063-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Busschop J, de Boever J, Schautteet H: Revascularization of gingival autografts placed on different receptor beds. A fluoroangiographic study. J Clin Periodontol. 1983, 10: 327-332.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergstrom J: Vascular reaction in plaque-induced gingivitis: a quantitative approach. J Periodontal Res. 1992, 27: 604-608.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonakdar MP, Barber PM, Newman HN: The vasculature in chronic adult periodontitis: a qualitative and quantitative study. J Periodontol. 1997, 68: 50-58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yuan K, Jin YT, Lin MT: Expression of Tie-2, angiopoietin-1, angiopoietin-2, ephrinB2 and EphB4 in pyogenic granuloma of human gingiva implicates their roles in inflammatory angiogenesis. J Periodontal Res. 2000, 35: 165-171. 10.1034/j.1600-0765.2000.035003165.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. De Felice C, Latini G, Bianciardi G, Parrini S, Fadda GM, Marini M, Laurini RN, Kopotic RJ: Abnormal vascular network complexity: a new phenotypic marker in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Gut. 2003, 52: 1764-1767. 10.1136/gut.52.12.1764.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Yuan K, Jin YT, Lin MT: The detection and comparison of angiogenesis-associated factors in pyogenic granuloma by immunohistochemistry. J Periodontol. 2000, 71: 701-709. 10.1902/jop.2000.71.5.701.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cornelini R, Artese L, Rubini C, Fioroni M, Ferrero G, Santinelli A, Piattelli A: Vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel density around healthy and failing dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001, 16: 389-393.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cafffesse RG, Castelli WA, Nasjleti CE: Vascular response to modified Widman flap surgery in monkeys. J Periodontol. 1981, 52: 1-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Guiha R, el Khodeiry S, Mota L, Caffesse R: Histological evaluation of healing and revascularization of the subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Periodontol. 2001, 72: 470-478. 10.1902/jop.2001.72.4.470.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mormann W, Schaer F, Firestone AR: The relationship between success of free gingival grafts and transplant thickness. Revascularization and shrinkage-a one year clinical study. J Periodontol. 1981, 52: 74-80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Yanagihara K: Experimental studies on morphological changes of microvascular architecture following the free gingival autograft on denuded alveolar bone. Nippon Shishubyo Gakkai Kaishi. 1990, 32: 45-70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cranin AN, Sirakian A, Russell D, Klein M: The role of incision design and location in the healing processes of alveolar ridges and implant host sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998, 13: 483-491.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Faustov LA, Popkov VL, Galenko-Yaroshevskii PA, Sycheva NL, Meladze VN: Morphological study of reparative processes in the gingiva during therapy of chronic periodontitis with energostim and application of orthopedic splinting constructions. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2003, 136: 296-301. 10.1023/B:BEBM.0000008988.07040.6a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Meller AT, Rumjanek VM, Sansone C, Allodi S: Oral mucosa alterations induced by cyclosporin in mice: morphological features. J Periodontal Res. 2002, 37: 412-415. 10.1034/j.1600-0765.2002.01002.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kleinheinz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.