Skip to main content

Table 4 Fixed effects of categorial predictors on clustered emotional states

From: Looking good but tweeting bad? The social perception of orthodontic-related posts on Twitter and Instagram

Cluster (ref.: feeling okay)    t p Exp(B) 95% CI for Exp(B)
Predictor   Lower Upper
feeling great Intercept   −3.83 .00 0.24 0.11 0.49
Platform (ref.: Instagram) Twitter −0.57 .57 0.79 0.35 1.77
Content (ref.: random/other) braces removed 8.04 .00 18.39 9.04 37.42
  braces received −2.19 .03 0.38 0.16 0.90
  personal orthodontic-related information −1.26 .21 0.53 0.20 1.42
Comedic Value (ref.: no) yes 0.57 .57 1.16 0.70 1.91
Selfie (ref.: no) yes, with braces 1.86 .06 1.95 0.96 3.96
  yes, without braces 1.14 .26 1.66 0.69 4.01
feeling sad Intercept   −4.91 .00 0.05 0.02 0.17
Platform (ref.: Instagram) Twitter 2.35 .02 4.54 1.28 16.09
Content (ref.: random/other) braces removed −2.42 .02 0.05 0.01 0.57
  braces received 7.00 .00 31.92 12.10 84.23
  personal orthodontic-related information 6.49 .00 33.77 11.67 97.72
Comedic Value (ref.: no) yes −2.11 .04 0.37 0.15 0.93
Selfie (ref.: no) yes, without braces −0.19 .85 0.85 0.17 4.40
  yes, with braces −1.72 .09 0.33 0.09 1.16
  1. Note: Dependent variable (cluster) reference category: feeling okay. Reference category for each predictor in brackets