Skip to main content

Table 4 Fixed effects of categorial predictors on clustered emotional states

From: Looking good but tweeting bad? The social perception of orthodontic-related posts on Twitter and Instagram

Cluster (ref.: feeling okay)

  

t

p

Exp(B)

95% CI for Exp(B)

Predictor

 

Lower

Upper

feeling great

Intercept

 

−3.83

.00

0.24

0.11

0.49

Platform (ref.: Instagram)

Twitter

−0.57

.57

0.79

0.35

1.77

Content (ref.: random/other)

braces removed

8.04

.00

18.39

9.04

37.42

 

braces received

−2.19

.03

0.38

0.16

0.90

 

personal orthodontic-related information

−1.26

.21

0.53

0.20

1.42

Comedic Value (ref.: no)

yes

0.57

.57

1.16

0.70

1.91

Selfie (ref.: no)

yes, with braces

1.86

.06

1.95

0.96

3.96

 

yes, without braces

1.14

.26

1.66

0.69

4.01

feeling sad

Intercept

 

−4.91

.00

0.05

0.02

0.17

Platform (ref.: Instagram)

Twitter

2.35

.02

4.54

1.28

16.09

Content (ref.: random/other)

braces removed

−2.42

.02

0.05

0.01

0.57

 

braces received

7.00

.00

31.92

12.10

84.23

 

personal orthodontic-related information

6.49

.00

33.77

11.67

97.72

Comedic Value (ref.: no)

yes

−2.11

.04

0.37

0.15

0.93

Selfie (ref.: no)

yes, without braces

−0.19

.85

0.85

0.17

4.40

 

yes, with braces

−1.72

.09

0.33

0.09

1.16

  1. Note: Dependent variable (cluster) reference category: feeling okay. Reference category for each predictor in brackets