Skip to main content

Table 4 Risk of bias assessment of the included studies

From: Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review

Quality criteria for studies

Sample randomization

Blind assessment

Statistical analysis

Defined inclusion and exclusion criteria

Report of follow-up

Risk of bias assessment

De Rio et al. 2017, Italy [35]

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Medium Risk

Ritto et al. 2017, Brazil [36]

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Medium Risk

Ho et al. 2017, Taiwan [1]

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Medium Risk

Chin et al. 2017, Germany [37]

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Medium Risk

Stokbro et al. 2016 USA [38]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low Risk

Baan et al. 2016, Netherlands [39]

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

Medium Risk

Zhang et al. 2016, China [40]

No

No

Yes

No

No

High Risk

De Rio et al. 2014, Italy [41]

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

Medium Risk

Hsu et al. 2013, USA [6]

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Medium Risk

Sun et al. 2013, Belgium [7]

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Medium Risk

Zinser et al. 2013, Germany [42]

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Medium Risk

Centenero and Hernández-Alfaro. 2012, Spain [43]

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Medium Risk