Skip to main content

Table 3 P values of comparisons of impression techniques within each angulation model. Pā€‰<ā€‰0.05 was accepted as statistically significant

From: Comparison of the accuracy of different impression procedures in case of multiple and angulated implants

Ā 

P values

Model 1

Coronal Deviation

Angular Deviation

Model 2

Coronal Deviation

Angular Deviation

Model 3

Coronal Deviation

Angular Deviation

SH*NSH

0.082

0.032

SH*NSH

0.026

0.036

SH*NSH

0.112

0.013

SH*SNH

0.087

0.066

SH*SNH

0.031

0.022

SH*SNH

0.014

0.028

SH*NSNH

0.062

0.026

SH*NSNH

0.026

0.097

SH*NSNH

0.026

0.006

SH*SMU

0.011

0.132

SH*SMU

0.046

0.036

SH*SMU

0.047

0.043

SH*NSMU

0.016

0.012

SH*NSMU

0.074

0.037

SH*NSMU

0.047

0.022

NSH*SNH

0.111

0.031

NSH*SNH

0.018

0.044

NSH*SNH

0.026

0.009

NSH*NSNH

0.117

0.172

NSH*NSNH

0.042

0.091

NSH*NSNH

0.039

0.096

NSH*SMU

0.024

0.023

NSH*SMU

0.016

0.026

NSH*SMU

0.033

0.029

NSH*NSMU

0.031

0.093

NSH*NSMU

0.044

0.005

NSH*NSMU

0.045

0.037

SNH*NSNH

0.091

0.01

SNH*NSNH

0.043

0.037

SNH*NSNH

0.036

0.005

SNH*SMU

0.014

0.072

SNH*SMU

0.027

0.026

SNH*SMU

0.119

0.044

SNH*NSMU

0.018

0.022

SNH*NSMU

0.035

0.036

SNH*NSMU

0.045

0.047

NSNH*SMU

0.027

0.039

NSNH*SMU

0.062

0.041

NSNH*SMU

0.039

0.014

NSNH*NSMU

0.017

0.132

NSNH*NSMU

0.026

0.033

NSNH*NSMU

0.042

0.023

SMU*NSMU

0.072

0.026

SMU*NSMU

0.033

0.185

SMU*NSMU

0.025

0.085