Skip to main content

Table 1 OHNS Reliability

From: Development, validation and application of a 3D printed model depicting adenoid hypertrophy in comparison to a Nasoendoscopy

 

Grading Systema

Clinical Classificationb

OHNS 1

OHNS 2

OHNS 1

OHNS 2

3D depictions

INTRA

P-value (95%)

INTRA

P-value (95%)

INTRA

P-value (95%)

INTRA

P-value (95%)

LU 2D

ICC = 0.00; CI: 0 – 0.55

NS

ICC = 0.88; CI: 0.63 – 0.96

P < 0.001

ICC = 0.92; CI: 0.78 – 0.98

P < 0.001

ICC = 0.93; CI: 0.78 – 0.98

P < 0.001

AD 2D

ICC = 0.97; CI: 0.92 – 0.99

P < 0.001

ICC = 0.93; CI: 0.79 – 0.98

P < 0.001

ICC = 0.93; CI: 0.78 – 0.98

P < 0.001

ICC = 0.93; CI: 0.78 – 0.98

P < 0.001

LU 3D

ICC = 0.86; CI:0.57–0.95

P < 0.0051

ICC = 0.64; CI: 0.0 – 0.88

P < 0.001

ICC = 0.93; CI: 0.78 – 0.98

P < 0.001

ICC = 0.73; CI: 0.19 – 0.913

P < 0.001

AD 3D

ICC=0.84; CI:0.52 – 0.95

P < 0.001

ICC = 0.71; CI: 0.12 – 0.91

P < 0.001

ICC = 0.75; CI: 0.23 – 0.91

P < 0.001

ICC = 0.16; CI: 0.0 – 0.73

NS

 

Grading Systema

Clinical Classificationb

OHNS 1 & OHNS 2

3D depictions

INTER

P-value (95%)

Observed Power

Effect size

INTER

P-value (95%)

Observed Power

Effect size

LU 2D

ICC=0.64, CI: 0 - 0.68

NS

1

96%

ICC=0.26, CI: 0.0 - 0.74

NS

0.92

53%

AD 2D

ICC=0.88, CI: 0.64 - 0.96

P < 0.001

1

95%

ICC=0.93, CI:0.78 - 0.98

P < 0.001

0.98

62%

LU 3D

ICC=0.59, CI: 0 - 0.87

P < 0.005

1

95%

ICC=0.26, CI:0.0 - 0.77

NS

0.84

47%

AD 3D

ICC=0.79, CI:0.37 - 0.93

P < 0.001

1

97%

ICC=0.73, CI: 0.14 - 0.91

P < 0.005

1

75%

  1. OHNS otolaryngologist; aaccordingly to Parikh et al, 2006 (grade 1, 2 3 and 4); benlarged and non-enlarged