Advocacy of diagnostic criteria for maxillary incisive canal cysts based on alteration of normal maxillary incisive canals according to aging in Japanese populations
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|17 Jun 2019||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Jul 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elif Yildizer Keris|
|28 Jul 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roman Fischbach|
|10 Aug 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mohammad Khursheed Alam|
|30 Aug 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Naruhiko Ueda|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Aug 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Sep 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roman Fischbach|
|12 Sep 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elif Yildizer Keris|
|4 Oct 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Naruhiko Ueda|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Oct 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Oct 2019||Editorially accepted|
|22 Oct 2019||Article published||10.1186/s13005-019-0209-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.