Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of potential long-term costs for preventive dentistry treatment of post-orthodontic labial versus lingual enamel cavitations and esthetically relevant white-spot lesions: a simulation study with different scenarios
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 Feb 2019 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 25 Feb 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Attin |
| 29 May 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Antonio Gracco |
| 26 Jun 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Knösel |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 26 Jun 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 5 Jul 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Attin |
| 5 Jul 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Antonio Gracco |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 7 Jul 2019 | Editorially accepted | |
| 9 Aug 2019 | Article published | 10.1186/s13005-019-0204-x |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
