Skip to main content

Table 3 Temporomandibular disorders pain characteristics of the study population after 6 months’ treatment

From: Antinuclear antibody and rheumatoid factor positivity in temporomandibular disorders

 

Total patients (n = 257)

Male patients (n = 51)

Female patients (n = 206)

ANA/RF (+)

(n = 39)

ANA/RF (−)

(n = 218)

P-value

ANA/RF (+)

(n = 4)

ANA/RF (−)

(n = 47)

P-value

ANA/RF (+)

(n = 35)

ANA/RF (−)

(n = 171)

P-value

CMOa

42 (36–48)

45 (40–50)

0.024*

43 (37–53)

50 (45–53)

0.347

41 (35–48)

44 (40–48)

0.088

MMOa

44 (38–49)

46 (42–51)

0.069

47 (38–54)

52 (47–54)

0.246

44 (38–49)

45 (40–49)

0.325

Pain on openingb

17/39 (43.6%)

54/205 (26.3%)

0.035

1/4 (25.0%)

13/45 (28.9%)

1.000

16/34 (47.1%)

41/157 (26.1%)

0.022*

Capsule palpationb

9/39 (23.1%)

53/205 (25.9%)

0.842

2/4 (50.0%)

9/45 (20.0%)

0.214

6/33 (18.2%)

42/157 (26.8%)

0.381

Muscle palpation

-masticatoryb

12/39 (30.8%)

72/205 (35.1%)

0.714

3/4 (75.0%)

13/45 (28.9%)

0.096

8/33 (24.2%)

58/157 (36.9%)

0.227

NRS improvementb

23/33 (69.7%)

106/166 (63.9%)

0.557

4/4 (100%)

24/36 (66.7%)

0.297

19/28 (67.9%)

82/127 (64.6%)

0.829

  1. ANA antinuclear antibody, RF rheumatoid factor, CMO comfortable mouth opening, MMO maximum mouth opening, Palpation a positive response on palpation, NRS improvement improvement of numeric rating scale score compared to the score before treatment initiation
  2. aDifferences between group means were tested with Mann-Whitney test: Median (lower quartile - upper quartile)
  3. bDifferences between group means were tested with Chi-square test