Skip to main content

Table 3 Repeated measures ANOVA with the subject as repeated factor revealed a significant difference between both methods in terms of velocity of protraction

From: Comparison of anchorage reinforcement with temporary anchorage devices or a Herbst appliance during lingual orthodontic protraction of mandibular molars without maxillary counterbalance extraction

Effect p-value
Method (Herbst; TAD) 0.008
Site location (right/left) 0.8
Interaction Method * Site location 0.2
  1. There was no significant effect of left- versus right-sided site location