Skip to main content

Table 3 Repeated measures ANOVA with the subject as repeated factor revealed a significant difference between both methods in terms of velocity of protraction

From: Comparison of anchorage reinforcement with temporary anchorage devices or a Herbst appliance during lingual orthodontic protraction of mandibular molars without maxillary counterbalance extraction

Effect

p-value

Method (Herbst; TAD)

0.008

Site location (right/left)

0.8

Interaction Method * Site location

0.2

  1. There was no significant effect of left- versus right-sided site location