Fig. 5From: Comparison of anchorage reinforcement with temporary anchorage devices or a Herbst appliance during lingual orthodontic protraction of mandibular molars without maxillary counterbalance extractionGraphic representation of changes in canine relations in the two groups of Herbst or TAD reinforced subjects. There was an improvement in canine occlusion in 90.9Â % of Herbst-treated and 14.29Â % of TAD-treated subjectsBack to article page