Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A comparative evaluation of dimensional stability of three types of interocclusal recording materials-an in-vitro multi-centre study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Won-suk Oh
7 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tannamala Pavan Kumar
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Vivekanand Kattimani
23 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Won-suk Oh
25 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tannamala Pavan Kumar
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Vivekanand Kattimani
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
19 Sep 2012 Editorially accepted
5 Oct 2012 Article published 10.1186/1746-160X-8-27

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement