A comparative evaluation of dimensional stability of three types of interocclusal recording materials-an in-vitro multi-centre study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|20 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Won-suk Oh|
|7 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tannamala Pavan Kumar|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Vivekanand Kattimani|
|23 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Won-suk Oh|
|25 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tannamala Pavan Kumar|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|30 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Vivekanand Kattimani|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|30 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|19 Sep 2012||Editorially accepted|
|5 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1746-160X-8-27|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.