Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Normative and self-perceived orthodontic treatment need of a Peruvian university population

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Feb 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Feb 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Kay
8 Mar 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jen Soh
28 Mar 2006 Author responded Author comments - Eduardo Bernabé
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Mar 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Mar 2006 Author responded Author comments - Eduardo Bernabé
18 Apr 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jen Soh
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Mar 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Jul 2006 Author responded Author comments - Eduardo Bernabé
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Jul 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 Jul 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Kay
27 Jul 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jen Soh
29 Jul 2006 Author responded Author comments - Eduardo Bernabé
Resubmission - Version 5
29 Jul 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
3 Aug 2006 Editorially accepted
3 Aug 2006 Article published 10.1186/1746-160X-2-22

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement