Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Polyp in concha bullosa: a case report and review of the literature

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Jan 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Feb 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - benjaporn nitinavkarn
3 Mar 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eberhard Seifert
10 Mar 2006 Author responded Author comments - Ismail Yilmaz
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Mar 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Mar 2006 Author responded Author comments - Ismail Yilmaz
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Mar 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Apr 2006 Author responded Author comments - Ismail Yilmaz
23 Apr 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - benjaporn nitinavkarn
23 Apr 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eberhard Seifert
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Apr 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 5
28 Apr 2006 Author responded Author comments - Ismail Yilmaz
Resubmission - Version 6
28 Apr 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 6
6 May 2006 Author responded Author comments - Ismail Yilmaz
Resubmission - Version 7
6 May 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
8 May 2006 Editorially accepted
8 May 2006 Article published 10.1186/1746-160X-2-11

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement