Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Piezoelectric-assisted removal of a benign fibrous histiocytoma of the mandible: An innovative technique for prevention of dentoalveolar nerve injury

  • Maximilian EH Wagner1,
  • Majeed Rana1Email author,
  • Wolfgang Traenkenschuh2,
  • Horst Kokemueller1,
  • André M Eckardt1 and
  • Nils-Claudius Gellrich1
Contributed equally
Head & Face Medicine20117:20

DOI: 10.1186/1746-160X-7-20

Received: 2 October 2011

Accepted: 31 October 2011

Published: 31 October 2011


In this article, we present our experience with a piezoelectric-assisted surgical device by resection of a benign fibrous histiocytoma of the mandible.

A 41 year-old male was admitted to our hospital because of slowly progressive right buccal swelling. After further radiographic diagnosis surgical removal of the yellowish-white mass was performed. Histologic analysis showed proliferating histiocytic cells with foamy, granular cytoplasm and no signs of malignancy. The tumor was positive for CD68 and vimentin in immunohistochemical staining. Therefore the tumor was diagnosed as primary benign fibrous histiocytoma. This work provides a new treatment device for benign mandibular tumour disease. By using a novel piezoelectric-assisted cutting device, protection of the dentoalveolar nerve could be achieved.


Piezosurgery benign fibrous histiocytoma mandibular tumor dentoalveolar nerve atraumatic bone surgery


According to the WHO histological classification of tumors, primary benign fibrous histiocytoma (BFH) of bone is defined as a benign lesion composed of spindle-shaped fibroblasts, arranged in a storiform pattern, with a variable admixture of small, multinucleated osteoclast-like giant cells. Foamy cells (xanthoma), chronic inflammatory cells, stromal haemorrhages and haemosiderin pigment are also commonly present [1]. According to this classification, there are less than 100 reported cases of BFH worldwide and only six reported cases in the mandible [27]. It is usually found in long bones, especially femur and tibia, and the pelvic bone, but may occur in virtually any bone. However, the precise removal especially in close vicinity to nerval structures is challenging. In our case resection of a mandibular tumor by preventing injury to the dentoalveolar nerve is difficult.

The presented case enlarges the indications for the use of ultrasonic devices in tumor surgery and thus emphasizes the beneficial effects of this technique in bone cutting close to nerval structures.

Materials and methods

A 41-year old Caucasian man was referred to our clinic for evaluation of a slowly progressive swelling of his right mandible. A panoramic radiograph (Figure 1) showed a well-demarcated multilocular radiolucent lesion with a reactive hyperostotic border in the right mandibular molar region. No other symptoms had been noted before.
Figure 1

Preoperative panoramic radiograph.

A computed tomography (CT) scan was obtained, which showed a heterogeneous soft-tissue mass (Figure 2). There was vertical expansion more prominent of the lingual side with thinning of the cortex and two small spots of cortical destruction. No lymph node involvement was observed. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan was performed to exclude the presence of a haemangioma prior to osseous biopsy (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Preoperative CT and MRI scans showing the heterogeneous lesion in the right mandible with no vascular signs.

Histopathological examination (Figure 3, 4) and immunohistochemical staining (Figure 5, 6) confirmed the diagnosis of primary benign fibrous histiocytoma.
Figure 3

Histopathological examination of the obtained tissue showing spindle-shaped fibroblasts, arranged in a storiform pattern (hematoxylin-eosin-staining, magnification 25×).
Figure 4

While in other parts of the specimen proliferating histiocytic cells with foamy, granular cytoplasm and no signs of malignancy dominate (hematoxylin-eosin-staining, magnification 100×).
Figure 5

Immunohistochemical staining positive for CD68 (magnification 100×).
Figure 6

mmunohistochemival staininga also positive for vimentin (magnification 100×), and negative for sm-actin, desmin, cytokeratin, S-100 protein or CD-56.

The patient was treated definitely via an extraoral submandibular approach (Figure 7). Simple cyst-like excochleation of the tumor in one piece was not possible due to different consistencies of the lesion. Rubber-like soft tissue parts of the tumor could be removed by curettage and excision, while bone-like hard tissue parts had to be removed using a bone drill. To prevent any nerve damage, bone-like hard tissue parts in the vicinity of the dentoalveolar nerve were removed exclusively by using the piezoelectric device (Figure 8). Despite the cortical destruction of lingual and buccal bone, the surrounding tissue was not affected. The lower rim of the right mandible could be preserved, stabilized with a osteosynthesis plate for fracture prevention. In order to achieve complete resection of the tumor, the teeth 46 and 47 were extracted and neurolysis of the inferior alveolar nerve was performed (Figure 9).
Figure 7

Intraoperative image of the original mandible.
Figure 8

Intraoperative image showing the removal of the bone with the piezosurgery device.
Figure 9

Intraoperative image after removal of the tumor.

The neurological analysis was performed bilaterally. It was used to evaluate nerve dysfunctions. The skin of the mental region, upper and lower lip were checked using a cotton test for touch sensation, a pinprick test using a needle for sharp pain and a blunt instrument for testing pressure. Additionally, a two point discrimination test was executed on these regions. The same procedure was accomplished for the lower lip and the mental nerve skin region. The results were recorded on a score that ranges between 0 and 13, with 13 being the worst neurological score. The neurological score was assessed at 4 points in time: on the 1st (T1 = 9), the 10th (T2 = 7), the 22nd (T3 = 3), the 184th (T4 = 1) postoperative day.

Piezosurgery® (Mectron®-Germany, Cologne, Germany) is an ultrasound device introduced in medical practice in 1988 for different procedures in application to hard tissues, including periodontal surgery, periapical surgery,[8, 9] the removal of impacted teeth, implant surgery for facilitating bone ridge expansion or in bone regeneration techniques,[10, 11] inferior dental nerve lateralization and transpositioning. Furthermore ultrasound has lately been used for osteotomies as well as for dental implant bone preparation and thus presents an additional option for cutting bone beside the classic osteotomy techniques using rotating burs or oscillating saws [12]. With this new option, the bone is cut almost without pressure through piezoelectrically induced oscillations. Micro-movements of 60-200 μm ensure that only the mineralized hard tissue is cut. The frequency of the oscillations applied in osteotomies lies between 22 and 29 kHz. This makes it possible to reliably prevent damage to soft tissue and nerve tissue during an osteotomy [10, 13]. Trauma to these types of tissue is only likely to occur at frequencies of 50 kHz or more [14, 15].


A primary benign fibrous histiocytoma in the mandible is extremely rare with only six reported cases in the literature [27].

The etiology of BFH is not yet clear. It may be a neoplasm consisting of fibroblasts and histiocytic-like cells [16] or a regression phenomenon of giant cells tumors [6]. BFH is mainly found in the pelvic bone, femur and tibia. Patients often report a history of pain or swelling over a long period of time, sometimes years. A sclerotic rim around the osteolytic defect is common [17].

The histologic appearance of BFH is identical to non-ossifying fibroma, making a clinical radiographic evaluation indispensable. The non-ossifying fibroma typically occurs during growth. BFH on the other hand is found in older patients, presenting with swelling or pain but usually no presence of complicating fractures. Non-ossifying fibroma is limited to the metaphysis of mainly the lower extremities, whereas BFH is found in the epi- or diaphysis or in flat bones [17].

To distinguish BFH from giant cell tumors can be challenging. On the one hand giant cells can be numerous in BFH, even if the mononuclear cell component is more spindled and associated with collagen formation [18]. On the other hand focal or extended fibrous tissue with lipid-bearing histiocytes can be found in giant cell tumor specimens [19, 20]. It was suggested to differentiate the two diseases radiologically due to the fact that most giant cell tumors are very much vascularized. The presence of a sclerotic rim in BFH could also be used to differentiate these two diseases [21].

One of the microscopic features is the presence of lipid-bearing histiocytes - also called xanthoma cells - sometimes dominating the histological picture in BFH.

As there are at least three reports of xanthomatous lesions in the mandible [2224], a comparison with BFH seems reasonable. Xanthomas of the bone are tumor-like accumulations of lipid-bearing histiocytes, either in combination with hyperlipoproteinemia or as part of other lesions like BFH. Xanthomas are no tumorous proliferation of any cellular element of the bone [17]. Therefore it is not listed in the WHO histological classification of bone tumors [1]. Radiographically, xanthomas lack a sclerotic rim. In contrast to BFH, extension into the adjacent soft tissue is reported in xanthomas [25]. In our case no extension in the surrounding soft tissue was detected, although there was cortical disruption at the lingual and buccal bulging.

The prognosis for BFH seems to be excellent with almost no recurrence after complete surgical resection. Due to the dominance of the bone mass close to the dentoalveolar nerve, the piezoelectric unit was a usefull tool to prevent nerve injury.

Ultrasonic waves are used in oral and maxillofacial surgery for various diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. They are applied in diagnostics, endodontics, the removal of calculus from the teeth and, most recently, osteotomies [2629]. Depending on the indication, the oscillation amplitude and frequency vary in accordance with the power transmitted to the tissue. Special presets are indicated for bone cutting procedures.

In the presented case the neurological scores from T1 to T4 demonstrate no dental nerve injury. No damage to the nerve was detectable even though direct contact of the working tip with the alveolar nerve was to be assumed. This is in line with experimental in vitro studies where no damage even in direct contact to the nerve was analyzed [10].

Follow-up examinations were obtained 3 and 6 months after surgery with no clinical and radiological evidence of recurrence (Figure 10).
Figure 10

Postoperative CBCT showing the defect and the titanium plate.


The purpose of the present article was to show the advantages of the piezoelectric-assisted surgical removal of a rare benign fibrous histiocytoma of the mandible and give a precise description of the experience with protecting dentoalveolar nerve.

BFH must be distinguished from non-ossifying fibroma or giant cell tumors by clinical appearance as well as histopathological appearance. As far as we know, the prognosis of BFH seems to be excellent after complete removal.

There is a therapeutical potential and benefit of the Piezoelectric-assisted surgical saw in dentoalveolar surgery. Piezosurgery® vibrates with a modulated ultrasonic frequency. Because the vibration frequency of Piezosurgery is optimal for mineralized tissue it does not cut soft tissue and therefore provides a technique for osteotomy to remove bony mass of the mandible and prevent anatomic soft tissue injuries like dentoalveolar nerve even in rare and complicated cases like this.

Consent statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.


The article processing charges are funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), "Open Access Publizieren".



Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Hannover Medical School
Department of Pathology, Hannover Medical School


  1. Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F, World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer: Pathology and genetics of tumours of soft tissue and bone. 2002, Lyon: IARC PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Heo MS, Cho HJ, Kwon KJ, Lee SS, Choi SC: Benign fibrous histiocytoma in the mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004, 97: 276-280. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.07.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Katagiri W, Nakazawa M, Kishino M: Benign fibrous histiocytoma in the condylar process of the mandible: Case report. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008, 46: e1-2. 10.1016/j.bjoms.2007.03.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kishino M, Murakami S, Toyosawa S, Nakatani A, Ogawa Y, Ishida T, Ijuhin N: Benign fibrous histiocytoma of the mandible. J Oral Pathol Med. 2005, 34: 190-192. 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2004.00274.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Remagen W, Nidecker A, Prein J: Case report 359: gigantic benign fibrous histiocytoma (nonossifying fibroma). Skeletal Radiol. 1986, 15: 251-253. 10.1007/BF00354071.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Spjut HJ, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (U.S.): Tumors of bone and cartilage, by Harlan J Spjut [et al.]. 1971, Washington,: Armed Forces Institute of PathologyGoogle Scholar
  7. White RD, Makar J: Xanthofibroma of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986, 44: 1010-1014. 10.1016/S0278-2391(86)80058-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Vercellotti T: Technological characteristics and clinical indications of piezoelectric bone surgery. Minerva Stomatol. 2004, 53: 207-214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Vercellotti T, De Paoli S, Nevins M: The piezoelectric bony window osteotomy and sinus membrane elevation: introduction of a new technique for simplification of the sinus augmentation procedure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001, 21: 561-567.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Metzger MC, Bormann KH, Schoen R, Gellrich NC, Schmelzeisen R: Inferior alveolar nerve transposition--an in vitro comparison between piezosurgery and conventional bur use. J Oral Implantol. 2006, 32: 19-25. 10.1563/1548-1336(2006)32[19:IANTIV]2.0.CO;2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Schlee M, Steigmann M, Bratu E, Garg AK: Piezosurgery: basics and possibilities. Implant Dent. 2006, 15: 334-340. 10.1097/ ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schaller BJ, Gruber R, Merten HA, Kruschat T, Schliephake H, Buchfelder M, Ludwig HC: Piezoelectric bone surgery: a revolutionary technique for minimally invasive surgery in cranial base and spinal surgery? Technical note. Neurosurgery. 2005, 57: E410-10.1227/01.NEU.0000176700.77461.C9. discussion E410PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Walmsley AD, Walsh TF, Laird WR, Williams AR: Effects of cavitational activity on the root surface of teeth during ultrasonic scaling. J Clin Periodontol. 1990, 17: 306-312. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1990.tb01094.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Vercellotti T: Piezoelectric surgery in implantology: a case report--a new piezoelectric ridge expansion technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000, 20: 358-365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. von See C, Gellrich NC, Rucker M, Kokemuller H, Kober H, Stover E: Investigation of perfusion in osseous vessels in close vicinity to piezo-electric bone cutting. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011,Google Scholar
  16. Spjut HJ, Ackerman LV, Fechner RE, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (U.S.), Universities Associated for Research and Education in Pathology: Tumors of bone and cartilage. 1981, Washington, D.C.: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology under the auspices of Universities Associated for Research and Education in PathologyGoogle Scholar
  17. Freyschmidt J, Ostertag H, Jundt G: Knochentumoren: Klinik, Radiologie, Pathologie. 2010, 3., überarbeitete und erw. Aufl. edn. Berlin: SpringerView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Clarke BE, Xipell JM, Thomas DP: Benign fibrous histiocytoma of bone. Am J Surg Pathol. 1985, 9: 806-815. 10.1097/00000478-198511000-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bertoni F, Calderoni P, Bacchini P, Sudanese A, Baldini N, Present D, Campanacci M: Benign fibrous histiocytoma of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986, 68: 1225-1230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Schajowicz F: Tumors and tumorlike lesions of bone: pathology, radiology, and treatment. 1994, Berlin; New York: Springer-Verlag, 2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamada T, Ito H, Araki Y, Fujii K, Inoue M, Ishida O: Benign fibrous histiocytoma of the femur: review of three cases. Skeletal Radiol. 1996, 25: 25-29. 10.1007/s002560050027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Harsanyi BB, Larsson A: Xanthomatous lesions of the mandible: osseous expression of non-X histiocytosis and benign fibrous histiocytoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1988, 65: 551-566. 10.1016/0030-4220(88)90138-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Marques Mateo M, Puche Torres M, Miragall Alba L, Iglesias Gimilio ME, Pascual Gil JV: Primary mandibular bone xanthoma. A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004, 33: 806-807.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Slootweg PJ, Swart JG, van Kaam N: Xanthomatous lesion of the mandible. Report of a case. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993, 22: 236-237. 10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80644-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Alden KJ, McCarthy EF, Weber KL: Xanthoma of bone: a report of three cases and review of the literature. Iowa Orthop J. 2008, 28: 58-64.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Brennan PA: External carotid artery stenosis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma--a prospective study. Oral Oncol. 2008, 44: 301-304. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2007.04.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. de Lange J, Putters T, Baas EM, van Ingen JM: Ultrasonic root-end preparation in apical surgery: a prospective randomized study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007, 104: 841-845. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.06.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Santos FA, Pochapski MT, Leal PC, Gimenes-Sakima PP, Marcantonio E: Comparative study on the effect of ultrasonic instruments on the root surface in vivo. Clin Oral Investig. 2008, 12: 143-150. 10.1007/s00784-007-0167-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Beziat JL, Bera JC, Lavandier B, Gleizal A: Ultrasonic osteotomy as a new technique in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007, 36: 493-500. 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.01.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Wagner et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.