Histological evaluation of the influence of magnetic field application in autogenous bone grafts in rats
© Puricelli et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 14 May 2008
Accepted: 11 January 2009
Published: 11 January 2009
Bone grafts are widely used in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction. The influence of electromagnetic fields and magnets on the endogenous stimulation of target tissues has been investigated. This work aimed to assess the quality of bone healing in surgical cavities filled with autogenous bone grafts, under the influence of a permanent magnetic field produced by in vivo buried devices.
Metal devices consisting of commercially pure martensitic stainless steel washers and titanium screws were employed. Thirty male Wistar rats were divided into 3 experimental and 3 control groups. A surgical bone cavity was produced on the right femur, and a bone graft was collected and placed in each hole. Two metallic washers, magnetized in the experimental group but not in the control group, were attached on the borders of the cavity.
The animals were sacrificed on postoperative days 15, 45 and 60. The histological analysis of control and experimental samples showed adequate integration of the bone grafts, with intense bone neoformation. On days 45 and 60, a continued influence of the magnetic field on the surgical cavity and on the bone graft was observed in samples from the experimental group.
The results showed intense bone neoformation in the experimental group as compared to control animals. The intense extra-cortical bone neoformation observed suggests that the osteoconductor condition of the graft may be more susceptible to stimulation, when submitted to a magnetic field.
Bone grafts are widely used for oral and maxillofacial reconstructive procedures . The influence of electric fields, electromagnetic fields and magnets on the stimulation of endogenous mechanisms in tissues is under research [2–5], in situations such as the repair of bone fractures with pseudoarthrosis, integration of bone grafts, osteoporosis and osteonecrosis [6–8]. Electromagnetic fields may influence different cell functions [9–11].
Electromagnetic fields may be applied with specifically designed devices, composed of spirals connected to a pulse generator. When the generator is turned on, electric current circulates and a magnetic field is established between the spirals. This type of electromagnetic field has been used for the stimulation of connective tissue repair , and has shown positive results in the treatment of fractures in humans [6, 8, 12].
Bruce and colleagues  investigated the effect of magnetic fields of 220 to 260 Gauss (G), produced by externally placed samarium cobalt magnets, on fracture healing in rabbits. Bone healing was assessed microscopically and mechanically, four weeks after the surgery. The bone exposed to magnetic fields were more resistant to breaking than control bone, but no significant difference was observed between magnetized and control groups.
Other studies, however, have shown controversial results on the influence of magnetic fields on tissue repair. Linder-Aronson and Lindskog , for instance, reported bone resorption in the tibia of rats near to implanted samarium cobalt magnets.
Puricelli and colleagues  evaluated histologically the influence of static magnetic fields produced by stainless steel washers buried in the bone, adjacent to a surgically created cavity in rats. In the control group, washers were not magnetized. The animals were sacrificed 15, 30, 45 and 60 days later, and samples were collected and histologically analyzed. Samples from the experimental group showed extensive trabecular formation beginning in the endosteum (day 15), formation of compact bone with a tendency to centripetal growth (day 30), and increased osteoclastic activity and bone remodelling (day 45). On day 60, experimental samples showed marked external configuration of the cortical bone surrounding the magnetic washers, with bone formation surpassing the cortical level. These results showed that magnetic fields, in this experimental model, resulted in increased efficiency of the experimental bone healing process.
Few studies have assessed the influence of magnetic fields on bone healing after autogenous bone grafting. Improved integration of bone grafts by the stimulation of the receptor site and the graft with the use of magnetic fields may represent an important clinical advancement, particularly in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Osteointegrade Implants and Orthopedics.
This randomized experimental study, aiming to evaluate the influence of permanent magnetic fields buried in vivo on autogenous bone grafts, used methods previously reported by Puricelli et al  and Ulbrich . Thirty male Wistar rats (Rattus norvegicus albinus), 5-month old and weighing in average 400 g, were used. They were divided into 3 experimental and 3 control groups, which were analyzed on days 15, 45 and 60 after beginning of the experiment.
The metal devices consisted of commercially pure martensitic stainless steel washers and titanium screws. The screws measured 1.0 mm in diameter, 0.5 mm in thread pitch and 2.0 mm in length. The pre-made magnetized washers were 3.0 mm in outer diameter, 1.5 mm in core diameter and 0.5 mm thick. They were held over a 60 mm × 12 mm × 5 mm magnet during the sterilization process and surgery. Magnetic champs calculations were performed at the Electromagnetism Laboratory, Physics Institute from Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
The placement and stability of implants and bone grafts were confirmed by radiographic control at the end of the experiments. After sacrifice of the animals, femurs were longitudinally sectioned, which allowed simultaneous examination of the surgical cavity between the screw holes. Samples were collected and prepared in hematoxylin and eosin stain (HE) for histological analysis.
The present study followed the research line established by Puricelli . As in many other experimental studies, the rat was used as a model, due to its advantages in terms of ease of acquisition, maintenance and surgical manipulation [16–19]. The washers were maintained in place, bordering the site of the bone graft, by commercially pure titanium screws used in the experiments. The biocompatibility of titanium was confirmed in this study, as already observed by Puricelli et al  and Ulbrich .
Most of the studies in this field investigate the influence of electromagnetic fields on bone healing pseudoarthrosis or delayed healing [6, 8, 12]. In most of them, the magnetic fields are created by specifically designed devices external to the animal [2, 13, 20, 21]. This system presents some disadvantages such as the need of daily application of an electromagnetic field, long duration of the treatment and the need to connect to a source of electricity during application of the electromagnetic field . The pioneering work by Puricelli et al. and Ulbrich in 2003 [14, 15] introduced the concept of static magnetic fields arranged inside the body, which resulted in increased efficiency of the experimental bone healing process.
The experimental design and selection of methods to investigate the influence of magnetic stimulation on tissue repair are hampered by the scarcity of reports in the literature and lack of consensus on the intensity of the magnetic fields to be tested. The intensity of magnetic fields used in different studies ranges from 2 × 10-4 T (Tesla) to 8 T. This large variation is due, among other factors, to difficulties in the production and adjustment of the devices to create magnetic fields with intensities within the therapeutic range. Studies have also shown great variability in the duration of applications and treatments as a whole, with reports of daily applications ranging from one to eight hours, and treatments ranging from two days to eight weeks [6–8, 11, 21].
The present work included a pilot study based on the method described by Puricelli  (data not shown). Measurements of the magnetic fields in ten femurs showed that mean initial intensities on days 0, 15 and 60 were 51.52 × 10-4 T, 43.83 × 10-4 T and 25.36 × 10-4 T, respectively. During the experiment, the field was active but variations on the intensity were observed. These individual variations may represent methodological artifacts, due to the methods used for measurement, or they may be explained by differences in the composition of the metallic washers. The maintenance of a permanent magnetic field, buried in the tissue, opens the possibility of investigating the effect of continuous activity of magnets on the osseous tissue.
Our results showed that, on day 15, grafts were viable in control and experimental animals, but the interface of neoformed bone with the graft was more evident in the experimental group. Similar results were obtained by Puricelli et al  and Ulbrich , with intense trabecular formation in control animals on day 15, when compared to the control group. On day 45, samples from experimental animals presented only remnants of the grafts, and intense bone neoformation beginning on the periosteum parallely superimposed to the scar cortical, evidencing the osseous borders of the magnetized washers. These results show that bone activity was higher in experimental rats, when compared with control animals in the same period. On day 60, the new cortical on the magnetically stimulated graft area showed a tendency to remodelling, beginning on the neoformed region. The cortical showed a slightly convex configuration in control samples. This study thus suggests that the magnetic field, associated to the osteoconductor ability of the bone graft, induces areas of bone neoformation apparently larger than those previously observed by Puricelli and colleagues .
The magnetized stainless steel washers used in this work influenced positively the integration of the bone grafts.
The histological analysis of the region of bone graft on postoperative days 15, 45 and 60 showed that the permanent magnetic field stimulates by itself bone neoformation.
The intense extra-cortical bone neoformation observed in the experimental group suggests that the osteoconductor factor of the graft may be more susceptible to stimulation.
We would like to thank Prof. Lucienne Miranda Ulbrich (Centro Universitário Positivo – UnicenP) and Isabel Regina Pucci (Manager, Instituto Puricelli & Associados).
This study is in accordance with the guidelines for animal research established by the State Code for Animal Protection and Normative Rule 04/97 from the Research and Ethics in Health Committee/GPPG/HCPA.
- Gazdag AR, Lane JM, Glaser D, Forster RA: Alternatives to autogenous bone graft: efficacy and indications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995, 3: 1-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bruce GK, Howlett CR, Huckstep RL: Effect of a static magnetic field on fracture healing in a rabbit radius. Preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987, 222: 300-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hartig M, Joos U, Wiesmann HP: Capacitively coupled electric fields accelerate proliferation of osteoblast-like primary cells and increase bone extracellular matrix formation in vitro. Eur Biophys J. 2000, 29: 499-506. 10.1007/s002490000100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wiesmann H, Hartig M, Stratmann U, Meyer U, Joos U: Electrical stimulation influences mineral formation of osteoblast-like cells in vitro. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001, 1538: 28-37. 10.1016/S0167-4889(00)00135-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Halliday D: Eletromagnetismo. Fundamentos de Física. Edited by: Halliday D. 1994, Rio de Janeiro: Livros Técnicos e Científicos, 3: 3Google Scholar
- Sharrard WJ: A double-blind trial of pulsed eletromagnetic fields for delayed union of tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990, 72: 347-355.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aaron RK, Ciombor DM: Therapeutic effects of electromagnetic fields in the stimulation of connective tissue repair. J Cell Biochem. 1993, 52: 42-46. 10.1002/jcb.240520107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scott G, King JB: A prospective, double-blind trial of eletrical capacitive coupling in the treatment of non-union of long bones. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994, 76A: 820-826.Google Scholar
- Basset CA: Pulsing electromagnetic field: a new method to modify cell behaviors in calcifed and non-calcifed tissues. Calcif Tissue Int. 1982, 34: 1-8. 10.1007/BF02411199.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ishisaka R, Kanno T, Inai Y, Nakahara H, Akiyama J, Yoshioka T, Utsumi K: Effects of a magnetic field on the various functions of subcellular organelles and cells. Pathophysiology. 2000, 7: 149-152. 10.1016/S0928-4680(00)00043-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Teló M: O uso da corrente elétrica no tratamento do câncer. Edited by: Teló M. 2004, Porto Alegre: EdipucrsGoogle Scholar
- Basset CA, Mitchell SN, Gaston SR: Treatment of ununited tibial diaphyseal fractures with pulsing eletromagnetics fields. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981, 63A (4): 511-523.Google Scholar
- Linder-Aronson S, Lindskog S: A morphometric study of bone surfaces and skin reactions after stimulation with static magnetic fields in rats. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991, 99: 44-8. 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81679-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Puricelli E, Ulbrich LM, Ponzoni D, Cunha Filho JJ: Histological analysis of the effects of a static magnetic field on bone healing process in rat femurs. Head Face Med. 2006, 2: 43-10.1186/1746-160X-2-43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ulbrich LM: Avaliação do Efeito de um Campo Magnético Permanente na Cicatrização Óssea em Fêmures de Ratos. MSc dissertation. 2003, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, School of DentistryGoogle Scholar
- Veeck EB, Puricelli E, Souza MAL: Análise do comportamento do osso e da medula hemopoiética em relação a implantes de titânio e hidroxiapatita: estudo experimental em fêmur de rato. Odonto Ciência. 1995, 10: 235-291.Google Scholar
- Grace KL, Revell WJ, Brookes M: The effects of pulsed electromagnetism on fresh fracture healing: osteochondral repair in the rat femoral groove. Orthopedics. 1998, 21: 297-302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagai N, Inoue M, Ishiwari Y, Nagatsuka H, Tsujigiwa H, Nakano k, Nagaoka N: Age and magnetic effects on ectopic bone formation induced by purified bone morphogenetic protein. Pathophysiology. 2000, 7: 107-114. 10.1016/S0928-4680(00)00036-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aaron RK, Wang S, Ciombor DM: Upregulation of basal TGFbetaI levels by EMF coincident with chondrogenesis: implications for skeletal repair and tissue engineering. J Orthop Res. 2002, 20: 233-240. 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00084-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Camilleri S, McDonald F: Static magnetic field effects on the sagittal suture in Rattus norvegicus. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993, 103: 240-6. 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70004-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Darendelier MA, Sinclair PM, Kusy RP: The effects of samarium-cobalt magnets and pulsed electromagnetic fields on tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995, 107: 578-88. 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70100-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.